Opinion: Healthy forest critical for Tahoe
By Joanne Marchetta
With California and Nevada grappling with a third year of drought, one of the largest and most complex challenges we face over the long run at Lake Tahoe is adapting to a changing climate.
Climate change will affect the protection and restoration of our beautiful mountain lake as well as the expansive forests around it. And the health of our lake, forests, and communities are all intertwined.
Maintaining healthy forests here at Tahoe and also across the greater Sierra Nevada will be a critical issue as California works to confront its water scarcity problems and maintain water quality and quantity for nearly 40 million residents.
About 60 percent of California’s drinking water originates in the Sierra Nevada forests and the headwaters they shelter. Protecting the health of our Sierra Nevada forests is one and the same with protecting our communities and our water resources from fire.
The King Fire that broke out in western El Dorado County in September and burned nearly 100,000 acres is just the latest example showing that we have much work to do to better manage our forests and their watersheds. That same message was driven home by the “State of the Sierra Nevada’s Forests” report the Sierra Nevada Conservancy released in October.
Forests in the Sierra Nevada are overgrown and susceptible to wildfire and funding is not available to adequately treat them. That’s not to say the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and its partner agencies in the basin have sat idle – far from it.
Working together as the Tahoe Fire and Fuels Team, agencies in the basin are leading by example – collaborating to secure funding to reduce fuel loads, prioritize the work and get it done. From 2008 to 2013, almost 37,000 acres in the basin were treated for hazardous fuels by local, state, and federal agencies.
Our projects have been keeping up with our plans, but much more remains to be done. Adequately reducing hazardous fuels in the forests around our watersheds and our communities will require more funding, a situation that’s true here at Tahoe and throughout the rest of the Sierra Nevada.
That’s why TRPA is asking Congress to adopt the Lake Tahoe Restoration Act of 2013. The bill would authorize $415 million over 10 years to pay for environmental restoration projects, watercraft inspections and control efforts to fight invasive species, the Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Recovery Plan, and scientific research. Nearly one-third of the funding, $135 million, would pay for hazardous fuels reduction projects.
We know treating forests to reduce hazardous fuels is far more cost effective than fighting wildfires. One recent study estimated that fighting wildfires between 10 and 100 acres in size in our forests costs $2,000 to $3,000 per acre. That’s two- to three-times as much as projects to reduce hazardous fuel loads in them.
The Angora Fire that burned on Lake Tahoe’s South Shore in 2007 destroyed 254 homes, cost almost $7,500 per acre to fight, and on top of that, caused about $150 million in damage – all within a 3,100-acre area that is small compared to other recent fires that have burned hundreds of thousands of acres in California.
In addition to funding, maintaining healthy forests and watersheds in the Sierra Nevada will also require extensive relationship building and collaboration across political boundaries. Communities inside the region will have to work together and with communities outside the region. Members of the public, too, must ensure they have adequate defensible space around their homes and do what they can to be part of the solution as we try to create what are called fire-adapted communities.
This challenge represents an opportunity for stakeholders to seek significant progress through multiple-benefit fuel reduction projects that not only protect our many communities from fire, but also improve the health of our forests, reduce erosion, and protect the water sources millions of people rely on. The time to act is now. Please join us at any scale in finding solutions to the next set of challenges, even those as daunting as the long-term effects of climate change here in our beloved Sierra Nevada.
Joanne Marchetta is executive director of the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency.
Nicely said Joanne. We have to much work to do but I am glad to see TRPA getting out in front of this. If the Tahoe Forrest burns so many other things will be affected such as lake clarity, water quality, tourism and our own feelings about the beauty of where we live.
May I suggest you google in “Stop Thinning Forests. org” and see whats really going on, with the USFS snd logging. It’s very good and informitive. A real eye opener! OLS
Old Long Skis exactly how were you able to determine that that website tells the truth? Exactly what is it in your educational background that provides you with the knowledge to critically evaluate the information on that site and determine it is factual?
I really liked the statement on the website that stated there is no evidence thinning reduces fire severity. Hey OLS, what happens when you take a log out of the fireplace?
Right.
Moral Hazard, My educational background is just from what I’ve seen here firsthand living here on So. Shore.
Do I believe everything the USFS tells me? No!
Do I believe everthing the TRPA tells me? No!
I only was told of the Stop the Thinning Forests website yesterday, so I’m new to that.
With all the logging going on in the Tahoe Basin (10,000 acres on So. Shore alone) , I thought it was worth looking into. Wait till they get to North Shore!.
So where does it end? Keep cutting more trees ruining streams and reducing lake clarity ?, destroying animal habitat? All in the name of the allmighty dollar profit from timber sales.
I cut my own firewood for many years with a USFS permit and only cut marked trees by the USFS. Helped to warm the house come winter! This wholesale logging operation and the destruction of our lands needs to stop! Sure, residential cutting is fine, but not this big time commercial cutting. Not good.
Let the locals cut trees for their own use to heat their homes and save the forest we call home.
Thank you , OLS
“The Angora Fire that burned on Lake Tahoe’s South Shore in 2007 destroyed 254 homes…”
I would like to add to that just how fast those 254 homes burned to the ground due to this area being so overgrown with so much ladder fuel that the fire got up in the tree crowns immediately. In those first 60-90-minutes that fire moved so fast that there was no hope of stopping it and of saving any of those homes. When I drove away from my house that day with my dog in my car and the few possessions I was able to grab the fire had already jumped Tahoe Mountain Road and was burning across the street from Sawmill Pond with spot fires coming up all over the place along Lake Tahoe Boulevard. Live through something like that and then come tell me that ladder fuels thinning is a bad thing.
This is not about clear-cutting forests, it’s about the need to thin the underbrush or ladder fuels so that entire forests can stand a chance of not burning to the ground and causing all the ensuing erosion associated with a burn scar. Forests use to burn naturally about every other decade and nature took care of eliminating those ladder fuels so that the fires had less chance of going into the tree crowns. It wasn’t until people moved into forested areas and then started “managing” the forests with the attitudes of “don’t thin anything and let everything be natural with lots of overgrown and dead debris” that nature got so screwed up.
THIN THE FORESTS!
Spouse – 4-mer-usmc
well put, spouse
Yes, indeed, thin the forests! But couldn’t we make it look a bit more natural and not so much like a man made
thing? A few groupings of trees so wildlife can find cover when they want it. Remember that this is what we will be looking at for generations to come. Its not so hard to thin for fire protection and throw in a bit of natural while we’re at it.
Yes, lets thin the forests, oh ,the heck with it, lets just clear cut. Oh wait, that was done before in the 1800’s. Lets leak raw untreated sewage leak into the lake. Oh yeah, thats been done to. How about uncontrolled developement in areas all around the lake. Well, thats a done deal, so just move along folks, we’ll ask for your opinion when it’s all said and done and the ink is dry on the papers with all the agencies (after being bought off) and the investors ready to pounce!!!
Yessirree, we got all that goin’ on!!!
So in the big picture of things, who cares? Who cares bout thousands of acres being logged in the Tahoe area? Apparently, not many. I do!!!, but I feel like I’m alone, as I watch the destruction of Lake Tahoe and its small communities that hug the shoreline. A way of life in a beautiful place thats being ripped away from us.
Take care, Old Long Skiis
OLS:
Give me a break. Thinning isn’t clear cutting. Thinning is removal of the ladder fuels on the forest floor. You ever thin your garden when the seeds are coming up?
You’re not the only one who cares about Tahoe OLS. Get off the cross–you might want to use that wood to heat your house while you dump more smoky pollution into the air.
Spouse – 4-mer-usmc
WIND was the culprit that caused the majority of the issues with the Angora fire. Thinning the forest, especially the small diameter, closly growing ladder fuels can certainly help to keep a fire from increasing in strength but the winds that were blowing that day was the culpret that caused such devistation. Unfortunatly thinning operations are never what they seem. The angecies responsable for the contracts know that these sales would never sell unless big trees are part of the deal. Thats why I dont believe thinning forest lands ever works cuz noone can make any money doing it. And if you cant make money….
Spouse- 4-usmc, I was being sarcastic. I know thinning is’nt the same as clear cutting. I was just trying to make a point. Sorry if I offended. OLS