Climate change affecting Lake Tahoe
By Susan Wood
INCLINE VILLAGE – If a tree grows submerged in a lake, will anyone notice?
That’s the prevailing question posed during a lecture at Sierra Nevada College last week by Benjamin Hatchett, who studies climate models for the Nevada State Climate Office of UNR.
The talk, which brought out almost 100 people who were interested in the topic, covered changes to the landscape of what’s considered the Great Basin. Its series of lakes provide a picture of the past and perhaps the present and future of the climate’s effects on Walker, Convict, June and Mono lakes, as well as Emerald Bay and other areas of Lake Tahoe.
From tufa and tree stumps to shorelines and slow-moving glacial movements, Hatchett’s slide show demonstrated a much different-looking western front surrounding Tahoe.
And as much science as there was, Hatchett made the subject somewhat light with his reference to Bonneville Lake being more known now for giant desert parties and speed races.
Scientists like Hatchett are now able to make the connection between moisture availability with outgoing evaporation and incoming precipitation – a subject near and dear to California and Nevada residents enduring one of the worst droughts in a century.
Tahoe-area researchers have been able to discover 200-year-old trees submerged in Walker Lake, just like those they’ve found in Fallen Leaf. And Mono Lake’s high shorelines that make the tufa rock formations so unusual are “an indicator of how dry it can be here,” Hatchett pointed out.
How do these dry spells affect the web of life?
Walker Lake’s low level has already jeopardized Hawthorne’s famed Loon Festival, a mainstay for the small Western town. When the lake drops, the food chain is disrupted and therefore the birds reduce their visitation.
The best scientists can hope for is moisture because we’re all at the mercy of Mother Nature. Beyond using historical maps, they can also count on solving equations upon geographic grid cells on charts using components such as snowpack, snowmelt, temperature, precipitation, evaporation and water storage.
So at least we’ll have a heads up if we face a “modern mega drought,” which is the worrisome equation at work here.
From 2012 to 2014, the Great Basin experienced the similar level of precipitation to other mega droughts based on the models.
“We could end up with lakes drier than the time when we had trees growing in them,” Hatchett said, adding that the scenario could lead to “massive socioeconomic and ecological implications.”
As it is, Hatchett cited a $2 billion expense reported by UC Davis of the three-year drought. It’s difficult to imagine a long-lasting mega drought.
So, Hatchett put up pictures that showed Emerald Bay and Fallen Leaf Lake as a series of moraines during the Ice Age more than 14,000 years ago. These extreme climate conditions result from large-scale swings in hydrologic history.
The ice flowed down Eagle Creek into Emerald Bay “leading to a nice place to go have tea,” he said, referring to Fanette Island situated in the middle of the bay. The resident of Vikingsholm, Helen Knight, took her guests out there for the English staple.
“Desolation Wilderness is one of the best examples of the Ice Age,” he said.
So the next time you walk in the wilderness and notice a few rock formations that either seem thrown there or out of place in terms of other nearby rocks – think ice movement.
“We can blame glaciers for a lot of weird geologic finds,” he said. What’s the big picture? “Natural or manmade (climate conditions) – if it gets drier, we’re all in big trouble,” he clarified.
And with that, the audience was hushed with keen interest.
Bob Richards, Tahoe researcher Charles Goldman’s understudy for years, was on hand for the talk. Afterward, he told Lake Tahoe News that he wanted to know if Hatchett could say how the 5,000-year-old submerged trees out from Taylor Creek on the South Shore fit into the climate picture of other submerged forests such as the Walker Lake drainage.
After the talk, Hatchett confirmed it’s all a part of the same dry picture. All the studying was food for thought for those wanting to “appreciate a lot of the features around us and how they’re a product of a long-term state of our climate,” Hatchett said. “This can be helpful in what we would do now for the ‘what if’ we’re three years into a 10-year drought.”
More observing is on the horizon. This includes studying the submerged forest off shore from Kings Beach next.
No question CO2 caused all this. Good article on the power of nature.
and then there’s this:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2014/12/08/california-drought-cause-noaa/20095869/
The Great Basin used to an inland sea. Climate change is part of the planet, always has been.
Wow. That might be the dumbest use of the laziest denier argument I’ve ever read.
If you want reality coverage of climate change issues, try this link: http://www.democracy.org
I have many long time Filipino friends whose opinions about issues I respect, I challenge locals to listen to this program and listen to our neighbors from island nations that will be adversely affected sooner than our community.
Who is funding climate change denial? Buy a clue.
Climate change is inevitable. Global warming isn’t. The great pause continues and the warmists are still at a loss to explain its existence..
http://www.climatedepot.com/
“If a tree grows submerged in a lake, will anyone notice?” is an unfortunate choice for an opening line: The point of all these submerged tree finds is that those species DON’T grow “submerged” in lakes: The lake level had to have been MUCH lower, and for a long time, for trees to sprout and grow to the large size seen.
As long as the “Powers” are paying the bill, people will continue to write papers and give speachs paid for by our tax dollars eliciting why we need to “Pay more TAXES” Great scam ~ EXCEPT https://w3.newsmax.com/LP/Finance/CTI/Dark-Winter?ns_mail_uid=14249920&ns_mail_job=1598709_12092014&s=al&dkt_nbr=e3lklbre
I know, the climate Zombies will be frothing at the mouth!!
Marlene and friends: define climate.
Fish, you’ve been asking people to define climate for at least 3 years now. You need a new routine. That one is old. We KNOW you think you’re the smartest person in the room already. Now you’re just getting stale.
Dog. It is a fair question. There is a large difference between “climate” and “weather.”
And dogs routine isnt old and stale? The finger pointing continues.
Dog: How old is the earth?
Fish: Bite me.
You’re a Christian.
Shouldn’t you forgive me?
Good to see that Kae’s Thanksgiving message on civil discourse has taken a solid hold here. LOL! So the battle continues, and will as long as weather, and long-term weather (climate) changes. I think it’d be pretty boring if neither changed. And I stand (alone??) with the plants and veggies. We need more CO2. 0.04% just doesn’t cut it for me. We humans get what, 20% O2? It’s just not fair!! If only we could figure out a way to increase CO2, and plant life, and vegetation, and a little more warmth that would be beneficial to those species. But this dastardly rock we’re on has a way of pushing back on all such initiatives. It’s bigger, even than the heads of those believing that through policy and taxation and wealth transfer to 3rd world nations, that we can build a global air conditioner.