Brown’s budget calls for record $113 bil. in spending
By Josh Richman and Jessica Calefati, San Jose Mercury News
SACRAMENTO — Gov. Jerry Brown rolled out a $113 billion budget Friday morning that boosts K-12 schools but doesn’t add more money for the University of California, which has threatened tuition hikes.
Although the proposed budget shows income and corporate taxes fueling the state’s second consecutive surplus after years of red ink, Brown said his plan signifies “self-discipline and real prudence” — even as advocacy groups say it’s high time to shore up the universities and mend the social safety net shredded by bone-deep cuts in past years.
“It’s a question of priorities,” Brown said. “There’s only so much money here.”
Still, the plan represents a 5 percent increase in general-fund spending over this current year. It would put another $1.2 billion into the state’s “rainy day” budget reserve fund, bringing its balance to about $2.8 billion, and would pay down about $1.2 billion in debt.
K-12 schools and community colleges get $65.7 billion in fiscal year 2015-16 under Brown’s plan — a 39 percent increase over four years ago — with much of the growth going to the Local Control Funding Formula that Brown and lawmakers enacted in 2013. Past K-12 budget deferrals will be all paid off.
WHO MAKES MORE MONEY, GOVERNOR JERRY BROWN OR SOUTH LAKE TAHOE COPS AND DA VERN PIERSON?
El Dorado DA Vernon Pierson made $258,220.12
SLTPD Chief BRIAN UHLER made $224,117.93
SLTPD SGT. JEFFREY REAGAN made $227,505.72
SLTPD SGT. PHILLIP WILLIAMS made $215,920.66
SLTPD LIE. DAVID O STEVENSON made $210,653.85
Thanks for the info. Ty! Worth remembering the next time the City says it needs money.
SLTPD: $800,000 that’s what you call top heavy in a population of less then 20,000 people. Plus their retirement!
How do we know that figure is top heavy? Is there a study I could reference? I would actually like to see some data to better understand just where we are. I do think using the 20,000 population figure is not quite accurate given the number of tourists we see. But it would be interesting to see some comparables.
I’m familiar with the website those figures come from, but I’m tremendously skeptical of the accuracy of what they represent. At minimum, I can’t help but suspect that the site is jiggered about to falsely represent the facts.
If I can come up with a reasonable critique of the figures, I’ll be sure to post it.
For whatever it’s worth, it’s not even remotely representative of my personal experience.