THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Calif. declares electronic cigarettes a health threat


image_pdfimage_print

By Fenit Nirappil, AP

SACRAMENTO — California health officials Wednesday declared electronic cigarettes a health threat that should be strictly regulated like tobacco products, joining other states and health advocates across the U.S. in seeking tighter controls as “vaping” grows in popularity.

The California Department of Public Health released a report saying e-cigarettes emit cancer-causing chemicals and get users hooked on nicotine but acknowledging that more research needs to be done to determine the immediate and long-term health effects.

“E-cigarettes are not as harmful as conventional cigarettes, but e-cigarettes are not harmless” said California Health Officer Ron Chapman. “They are not safe.”

New generations of young people will become nicotine addicts if the products remain largely unregulated, Chapman said. Last year, 17 percent of high school seniors reported using e-cigarettes, known as vaping, according to the report.

“Without action, it is likely that California’s more than two decades of progress to prevent and reduce traditional tobacco use will erode as e-cigarettes re-normalize smoking behavior,” the report says.

E-cigarettes heat liquid nicotine into inhalable vapor without the tar and other chemicals found in traditional cigarettes. A cartridge of nicotine can cost anywhere from $5 to $20 and can be reused.

California banned the sale of e-cigarettes to minors in 2010, but the report raises concerns about children consuming liquid nicotine with flavors such as cotton candy and gummy bear. Reports of children under 5 with e-cigarette poisoning jumped from seven in 2012 to 154 last year.

The California report says e-cigarettes emit as many as 10 toxic chemicals, but advocates say there is no evidence those substances are released at dangerous levels.

“Despite the health officer’s false claims, there is ample evidence that vaping helps smokers quit and is far less hazardous than smoking,” Gregory Conley, president of the e-cigarette advocacy group American Vaping Association, said in an email. “Smokers deserve truthful and accurate information about the relative risks of different nicotine products, not hype and conjecture based on cherry-picked reports.”

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is also proposing regulations that include warning labels and ingredient lists on e-cigarettes, although enactment could take years. California health officials are calling for restrictions on the marketing and sale of e-cigarettes and protections against accidental ingestion of liquid nicotine.

A state senator introduced legislation this week that would regulate e-cigarettes as tobacco products and ban their use in public places such as hospitals, bars and schools. A similar bill was defeated last year over opposition from tobacco companies.

Chapman, the health official, would not take a position on specific legislation, but said his department would be rolling out an e-cigarette awareness campaign with possible television and radio advertisements.

E-cigarettes have become more visible as they grow in popularity and commercials for the products air in places where traditional cigarette ads have been banned. Businesses related to e-cigarettes, including vaping lounges, are rapidly popping up in cities across California.

Geoff Braithwaite, co-owner of an Oakland store that sells liquid nicotine for e-cigarettes, said he understands the need to restrict vaping in public and prevent sales to minors. He says his customers are longtime smokers who should be able to get a nicotine buzz without the harshness of a regular cigarette.

“Nicotine has all this stigma attached solely to the medium we used to use,” Braithwaite said. “When you try to outright ban e-cigarettes, you’re lumping in the solution with the problem.”

Other states, including Oklahoma, Tennessee and Arkansas, already have issued advisories cautioning the use of e-cigarettes. Legislatures have been exploring restrictions on e-cigarette marketing, adding childproof packaging requirements and imposing taxes to discourage use.

“Health officials want to be proactive on this important public health issue,” said Lisa Waddell, who leads community health and prevention at the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials. “The issue of real concern here is we really don’t know everything that’s in these products, and you are seeing the rise of the use of these products in our children as well as our adults.”

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (14)
  1. Dogula says - Posted: January 30, 2015

    So, e-cigs need to be banned in public because they’re so dangerous, yet marijuana smoke is fine.
    It’s “smoking behavior” that they’re worried about? It’s all about appearances, isn’t it? Nicotine itself is one of the most benign drugs out there. But it looks like cigarettes so we must STOP it!
    California is insane.

  2. nature bats last says - Posted: January 30, 2015

    DUH….

  3. Lisa says - Posted: January 31, 2015

    A benign Drug???? There is a large increase of calls to poison centers for nicotine poisoning due to liquid nicotine. But from your everyday cigarette….”Since 1964, 28 Surgeon General’s reports on smoking and health have concluded that nicotine health risks are real and tobacco use is the single most avoidable cause of disease, disability, and death in the United States. Yet, some people still ignore the dangers of nicotine.”

    You two may be smokers and convincing yourselves that you are not slowly killing yourself every day, but science is not on your side. By the way, though people do it, smoking marijuana in public in California is not legal.

  4. Dogula says - Posted: January 31, 2015

    Lisa, I don’t smoke or vape.
    But government doesn’t need to stick its nose into every facet of everybody’s lives. If people are too stupid to keep their kids out of dangerous stuff, that’s their business. How you gonna keep ’em from eating the laundry detergent? Will you ban that too?

  5. ljames says - Posted: January 31, 2015

    “How you gonna keep ‘em from eating the laundry detergent? Will you ban that too?”

    equating the number of people and the cost to society of people that eat laundry detergent (although safety caps for children is surely a public health issue) vs the effects of people that smoke cigarettes or are otherwise addicted to chemical substances like nicotine is pretty absurd.

  6. Dogula says - Posted: January 31, 2015

    Liquid nicotine. Nobody’s eating their parents’ cigarettes. But still, it is up to adults to be responsible and keep dangerous stuff away from their kids. Don’t you teach your children not to touch a hot stove, or stick their fingers in the sockets? Don’t you teach them not to drink your beer?
    It is NOT the job of your government to protect everybody from everything.
    Grow up and be responsible for yourselves.

  7. Lisa says - Posted: January 31, 2015

    Nobody makes your stove in cute pink bottle with he taste of bubble gum.

  8. ahem says - Posted: January 31, 2015

    Dogula: Do you think that E-Cigs are fine? Please. Get rid of the pot smokers, the e-cig smokers and the regular-cig smokers! Other places have done it and it is a tremendous improvement. I would really like to be able to walk into the front door of ltcc without ten weirdoes standing around blowing smoke at me.

  9. Dogula says - Posted: January 31, 2015

    I repeat: teach your kids to stay out of your stuff.

    Ahem: where do you go that there are 10 people blowing smoke in your face? It’s against the law to smoke in most public buildings, even in private businesses. And if it is legal someplace you go, well, don’t go there.

    WHY does everybody demand that government do everything for them? Government is not your bully. Grow up.

  10. nature bats last says - Posted: January 31, 2015

    Dog, you are a paranoid and hateful person…..

  11. ahem says - Posted: January 31, 2015

    Dog: Read my comment more carefully. There are usually lots of people standing around in front of LTCC smoking. If you’ve ever been there, you should know what I’m talking about. They stand near the pickup/dropoff area, making it impossible to walk to the front door of the college without getting completely smoked out! It was recently banned, so they aren’t supposed to do it now, but they do it anyway! It is worse in the summer, because the smokers don’t like to stand out in the cold in the winter. Maybe we should use money from measure F to enforce the rules. 55 million ought to get the job done!
    Nature: State what is wrong with what Dog said.

  12. rock4tahoe says - Posted: January 31, 2015

    What do you expect from, “nicotine is benign” Dog. It thinks a couple of guys doing smack need their 2nd Amendment Rights protected because… you know… junkies, meth and crack heads need their guns too. LOL!

  13. Ahem says - Posted: January 31, 2015

    Rock: second amendment rights are for sane people, not junkies, meth and crack heads. Nicotine ain’t benign, I don’t care what anyone says.

  14. Ernie Claudio says - Posted: February 3, 2015

    Question: 500,000 smokers will die from lung cancer this year, how many lives will be saved if they kept smoking but switched to the e-cig?

    My guess: 80,000 the first year.