THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Pesticide linked to cancer has boomed in Calif.


image_pdfimage_print

By Rachael Bale, Reveal

Monsanto Co.’s Roundup has been having a bad couple of weeks. Last week, the World Health Organization declared that its active ingredient, glyphosate, and two other pesticides probably cause cancer in humans.

Another study out this week suggests glyphosate use also may contribute to antibiotic resistance, a mounting problem that’s begun to be compared to climate change.

Glyphosate is one of the most widely used pesticides in the world. Using our California pesticide database, we wanted to see where it is used, on which crops and just how much gets applied.

In California, glyphosate use for commercial agriculture has increased by nearly two-thirds over the past decade. About 20 percent of it went to almonds alone. It is most heavily applied in the Central Valley counties of Fresno and Kern.

While it’s popular in the United States, glyphosate is banned, or about to be banned, in several countries because of health risks that may range from infertility and birth defects to kidney disease. The WHO report now says it could cause non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Malathion, WHO found, could cause non-Hodgkin lymphoma and prostate cancer. In California, malathion use has decreased by more than 40 percent from 2003 to 2012. Much of the malathion applied in California goes to strawberry and alfalfa crops.

Use of diazinon, the third pesticide newly identified as probably carcinogenic, has dropped 85 percent in California during the past decade. It’s used most heavily on lettuces. More than one-third of all diazinon applied in California was used in Monterey County. The WHO says there is some evidence diazinon could cause non-Hodgkin lymphoma and lung cancer.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which regulates pesticides, does not consider glyphosate, malathion or diazinon to be carcinogenic. In 1985, the EPA classified glyphosate as possibly causing cancer, but six years later, changed its designation after new studies suggested it does not cause cancer.

Malathion and diazinon are part of a class of pesticides known as organophosphates, which previously have been the source of health concerns because of what they can do to the brain and nervous system. They work by blocking an enzyme called acetylcholinesterase, which breaks down a certain neurotransmitter. When there isn’t enough acetylcholinesterase, the neurotransmitter builds up, causing nerve overstimulation. That causes pest insects to die, but in high enough doses, it can make humans really sick, too.

When your nervous system doesn’t work right, your muscles – including your heart and those involved with breathing – don’t work right either. Effects of organophosphate exposure range from eye and skin irritation to muscle twitching, trouble breathing and a fast heartbeat, to seizures and death. Some organophosphates, including malathion and diazinon, also are considered by some agencies to be endocrine disruptors – meaning they mess with humans’ hormones.

These new cancer designations are controversial, especially in the case of glyphosate. Some scientists, along with Monsanto, say the evidence that WHO cites appears thin. The Science Media Centre in London has a valuable roundup of scientists’ reactions to WHO’s announcement.

Another thing to keep in mind is the difference between hazard (pesticides can cause cancer) and risk (how likely a person is to get cancer from those pesticides).

“The IARC (World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer) process is not a risk assessment. It determines the potential for a compound to cause cancer, but not the likelihood,” Alan Boobis, a biochemical pharmacology professor at Imperial College London, told the Science Media Centre.

That means the next step is more studies looking at the health of farmworkers and nearby residents who are exposed to these pesticides to determine if they are likely to cause cancer in real-world situations.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (7)
  1. Isee says - Posted: April 5, 2015

    Here’s the reality of chemical use in this country. In the USA, chemicals including pesticides are innocent until proven deadly. Over 90,000 chemicals and pesticides have been okayed for use and less than 10 have been pulled from use.
    An older cardiologist told me that people of all ages are showing signs of pesticides toxicity. People’s hearts are suffering from consuming food grown here in the USA and elsewhere.
    On this day celebrating Resurrection, let’s hope the Earth has just 3 days from death to rebirth- when we are done with it.

  2. Level says - Posted: April 5, 2015

    “Technically” glyphosate is an herbicide, not a pesticide.

  3. Sandy says - Posted: April 5, 2015

    Who needs the FDA and EPA with corporations such as Monsanto. Of course most people don’t know that Monsanto consultants, Monsanto lobbyists, legal counsel and Monsanto public affairs folks were all appointed by the Clinton and Obama White House to sit on the FDA. Monsanto is also behind the Trans Pacific Partnership Trade Agreement, also know as Fast Track. Amazing!!!

  4. Letsgetmuddy says - Posted: April 5, 2015

    In the 80s there was a major Medfly infestation in our state and the decision was made to do a Malathion aerial spraying program as well as release of sterile flies in hopes to eradicate this potentially devastating pest.

    I lived down south at the time and was I extremely vocal about this issue as I worked in Wildlife rehabilitation and at the time secondary organophosphate poisoning was,
    as it was presented to me not being taken seriously .

    These chemicals build up the tissues and are passed on up the food chain.

    Its a horrid death.

    Its been almost 30 years and I can still clearly see every bird I treated convulsing as it died in my hands….

    Every government official assured me the chemical was perfectly safe and I was over reacting when I would call and voice my complaints.

    My best friend at the time worked for the Ag department as a fly trapper, I got both sides of the argument.
    There were arguments…

    I understand it was a crisis and something drastic had to be done.

    But I was enraged.

    Citizens had no say as the choppers flew over their homes in the dead of night spraying toxic chemicals as if we were rows of crops.

    I had a neighbor who had severe Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and was sent off the edge and had to be hospitalized because he felt he was back in Vietnam and had to leave town when the subsequent spraying continued.

    It did feel like we were in war zone.
    We were being poisoned by our own government.

    If you didnt have your car covered or wash it right away chances were the mix in what they sprayed would damage the paint on your car.

    But we were told it was perfectly safe…
    they would say in their arrogance…
    trust us,
    we know whats best.

  5. Dogula says - Posted: April 5, 2015

    You guys keep making my arguments for me. You believe government needs more authority to protect us from the dangerous private sector. Yet they constantly prove themselves to be in bed with big corporations in the name of the almighty dollar and their own power. They aren’t protecting you. They are poisoning you and lying to you.
    But you still defend big government.
    SMH.

  6. Tomorrow Dreaming says - Posted: April 5, 2015

    The big corporations are in bed with big government and that is a big part of our countries problem.

    Dogula is spot on.

    It is not capitalism as I learned it. It is a sick and evil relationship.

  7. Isee says - Posted: April 6, 2015

    This article has perfect timing as our County Supervisor just protested the County dragging it’s feet on the purchase of a new Vector Control vehicle, saying basin residents may be harmed if mosquito spraying doesn’t happen as scheduled. Basin residents will DEFINETLY be harmed by the spraying. Can you say ‘multiple chemical sensitivity’? Better get informed as it’s coming to get you next.