THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Opinion: Tahoe — a glass half-empty


image_pdfimage_print

By Garry Bowen

Back around May Day, I wrote an article “A Glass Half-Full”, as a commentary on South Lake Tahoe celebrating  a 50th anniversary of its incorporation while at the same time having several workshops on the question of what SLT wants to be when it grows up, highlighted by looking at each of those workshops, from the original standpoint of until we know and find shared agreement as to who we are, we won’t know why we’re caring for a future for the next 50 years.

Let’s take another look, under the promised title, “A Glass Half-Empty”. A bit darker of a full mirrored reflection,  as Tahoe’s proposed and purported successful future may depend on it.

Garry Bowen

Garry Bowen

As an observation in that earlier May Day piece (not by accident was that simile used), some have sensed that these workshops “barely touched upon how to turn the ideas into reality”, so I’ve been pondering the actual directions seen since that time, given the coming and going of Memorial Day,  several soft opening months trial run of the fulfillment of our fourth casino being back in operation, and the just-completed 4th of July.

In a “Glass Half-Full”, included within was a cryptic comment: “examples of other strategic missteps lie in wait”; unfortunately, a “half-empty” approach turns out to be prescient for purposes of follow-through, as an in years past perspective was used in the first instance to share partially what a Tahoe experience was like then, as so many transitory lives do not have that perspective, nor apparently do they do now.

Today’s perspective has not gotten any better, as the word “abysmal” has come into play several times.

But adjustments can be made to shift to higher quality, if the now-seen gap can be creatively fulfilled.

The following comments will refer to basically two errant directions, both related to Tahoe South’s implied direction of Tahoe’s viable and vital experiences for our visitor-based economy. The first would be the current revival of the idea that we are to become “America’s All-year Playground”, the slogan that accompanied the time-span of SLT’s incorporation period in 1965, which ongoing earnest efforts of many young local staffs now suggest is going to happen – the new trail extensions, the new bicycle facilities, the continued mapping of our extensive trail network, even Vail’s corporate entry into summer activities complementary to “iffy” winter prospects, are all suggestive of fulfillment of that professed desire.

Problem is, most of the current visitor-based emphasis is on hanging around the largest provided venue for them, Heavenly Village, as a majority never venture very far away, like outbound for other activities in the area, relying once again on mostly a day-tripper crowd, a lot of whom are never seen downtown at all, and vice-versa. Marriott has some 4,000 locations around the world, Tahoe being but one of those that might be chosen to visit, so I believe it is Tahoe’s earlier known cachet that is the attraction, but it may not end up to be too fruitful in building a newer clientele unless new marketing strategies are deployed to fill the gaps.

It would appear that most visitors there want to be associated with Tahoe, but are not really experiencing it in its fuller versions or glory, in spite of what outgoing surveys might indicate.

After all, it is all of us that are here that are to know the difference, and by all accounts we do not.

That would lead to item No. 2, the current situations associated with our casino corridor, still thought to be our “core” of economic activity, at the very least in their opinion – two of the most prominent, closest to the California-Nevada state line, with entrepreneurial pedigrees unique to Lake Tahoe, and the other two, with a more variegated background, in spite of their long-standing traditional family connection.

Noting that Nevada proper has a very slight improvement in gaming revenues throughout the state, Stateline’s were nevertheless down over 6 percent, which suggests that either the addition of a fourth entity did nothing to stimulate an increase in market share to cover another third (33 percent) addition to the real estate, or that, in spite of a promotional “splash”, any new clientele were not satisfied or impressed.

That latter comment is worthy of a fuller look, as interactions I have had suggest that unless the service accompanies the new digs, the outlook for much repeat business is not too good, as “satisfaction will not bring them back,” as the 9-lives scenario hopes.

Combine that, for now, with the previous category idea of underutilized recreational facilities that local folks will most certainly enjoy, but which won’t do much to increase the tax base or revenue streams, then the significance of a marketing void becomes all the more apparent. The “need to grow up” includes knowing what steps to take that may overcome what “adolescent” tendencies need to be changed.

As my schedule is very flexible, yet includes a significant background here, I meet people from all over the world, as we all can and do, but I ask them of their experiences, from a perspective of knowing what questions to ask, which quite often require more than an “I’m fine” response to “How are you ?”

The most recent one was a young professional woman from Tasmania, whose friends in Reno and she decided that after conducting her business in Colorado, then to Nevada, that they wanted something different, exciting, and fun, so they chose coming up from Reno to stay at our newest venture, which promised the adjectives above – but when she can report that they were sorry they did that – that from the valet parking, to the front desk, to the bellman, to the wait for the entrée, when they wanted to go have the fun promised, it became quickly apparent that it was not to be delivered.

That prompted from a young, sophisticated global traveler a conclusion that the experience was “abysmal”, a descriptive word used in the English-speaking world, but not in any way as PR spin.

Unfortunately for Tahoe in this seemingly isolated and particular case, this has been too often mirrored these days regardless of the specific location, which of course has nothing to do with the creation of the original Tahoe cachet still reflected in the four, five, and six-color brochures touting the exciting and beautiful happenings to be had here.

The honest and sincere attempts at identifying ourselves from the recent past will not be fully realized, nor will our planned success in redeveloping our economic infrastructure, if all these efforts are not combined with the realization that our visitors are not just responsible for the jobs we have, but also serve as opportunities to improve our own attitudes about the experiences they expect and deserve while they’re here, and that staff’s management organize themselves in such a way to allow the staff to bring that experience to fruition.

Bottom-line issues simply cannot intrude into understaffing and undertraining – that  only contributes to what is known in the human resource field as “survival-hiring” – having too many slots to fill with the closest warm-body, as the time is not devoted to training them adequately and appropriately for the tasks they were chosen to do. With that, the term “turnstile” comes to mind.

After all, the reminder is that “service” is the only product we have, as we have no factories to produce it, just our presence in their experience of visiting here.

Nothing contributes to a “buzz kill” quicker than to encounter someone not happy or content in their position – that resonates far beyond the actual time spent in the encounter, by either side – and now, the farthest reaches of the globe don’t have a spokesperson for Lake Tahoe, including Mauritius, another resort community in the middle of the Indian Ocean … the conversation previous to the one mentioned above, as the word used then was “dismal”, another word not often chosen by professionals.

Of course, we won’t see those words in any brochure – while the experience itself gains steam all over.

Tahoe need not be part of a “picture-postcard mentality”, unless we want to end up thinking of ourselves as just another “pretty face”, as, trust me, there are plenty of them around the entire globe.

Until that realization hits home, the glass doesn’t just remain half-full, but will stay half-empty.

Garry Bowen has more than a 50-year connection to the South Shore, with an immediate past devoted to global sustainability, on most of its current fronts: green building, energy and water efficiencies, and public health. He may be reached at tahoefutureforum@gmail.com.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (11)
  1. Perry R. Obray says - Posted: July 17, 2015

    Seems Garry’s email and phone number don’t work.

  2. old long skiis says - Posted: July 17, 2015

    Gary Bowen, What Tahoe needs is repeat visitors to sustain our community, economicaly and enviromentaly. We need to clean up our town and work on hospitality towards our out of town guests.
    Tahoe has become a revolving door for visitors and residents alike. Schools closing, Post offices closing, empty stores along hi way 50…
    I believe more people are moving away than are moving in. We need to change direction and save our little town. Take care, Old Long Skiis

  3. Tired of Waiting says - Posted: July 17, 2015

    OLS you’re right on the money. I’ve been waiting for this area to decide what it wants to be since I moved here in the late 70’s. I raised my family here, but even though the kids love to come back and visit, it’s not the kind of place that they want to live. I worked 30+ years for the same employer and worked countless hours in the community trying to make it a better place. But now I’m worn out. My house is for sale. I’m tired of waiting……

  4. Cranky Gerald says - Posted: July 17, 2015

    I have no idea what Bowen’s background is or if he has ever been in business for himself, but Mr. Bowen is on point.

    Tahoe has a culture in the service and other commercial activities that firmly shows anyone seeking service (or some help with a city problem) that the customer is far less important than the employee they are seeking service from.

    I owned a business in this town about 12 years ago. After about 4 years, we let it go. We had learned quickly that the business could be enhanced or destroyed by employees. With a few notable exceptions, we never knew if the employees would show up at all, or if they did, the constant monitoring of how some were stealing from both us and the customers was a real trial. We paid premium wages compared to most businesses, and trained thoroughly, as the business was intensively computerized. More than a few were not interested in training, just the pay, so there was the swinging door effect to deal with.

    If anything, things are worse now than 15 years ago, and the employee “pickings” are far worse. Clearly this shows in Bowen’s comments.

    Everywhere I look, there is the situation where too few people are assigned to a task that had 10 percent more people doing it 10 years ago. If this task is service, the outcome is predictable.
    Now we hear of practices where the employer has the right to call up within an hour of your shift, and calling it off. Nobody can run their life that way.

    A major sea change is going to be necessary to get back on track and keep the middle class from further decimation. We all cannot be doctors, lawyers and indian chiefs, with the expected remuneration.

    If Tahoe could work this out, they literally could bottle it and sell it. I am not holding my breath.

  5. Perry R. Obray says - Posted: July 17, 2015

    Interesting article Garry. Thanks for getting us to think about our situation.

    Some people think if the locals enjoy the recreation around here, tourist will also. If that premise is correct, maybe the high cost of housing coupled with low wages is stifling that resort employee’s smile.

    Making things simple, let’s assume everybody into recreation is at an elevated level of mtn bike riding and snowboarding. A decent all terrain, dual suspension mtn bike that can be ridden at high speed probably has a MSRP starting around $3K, and rocketing after that. Not to mention the hundreds of $s at minimum for safety gear. Better quality snowboards go for about $400-$700 MSRP, and climb higher somewhat fast. Then there are bindings, boots, a season pass (maybe $300-$600). Then comes the comfortable coat at $400 MSRP, decent pants starting at $100, ect…. Minimum wage earner Joe resort worker might be out $5K-$10K just to start the Tahoe lifestyle.

    After making around $1,100 a month during peak season on a full time job after taxes, resort employee has a decent apartment paid for, food, ect.. Then the lucky resort employee gets to work 20 hours a week during off season, barely making rent. Traveling to 5 different churches and Christmas Cheer every week during the off season puts calories in the mouth.

    So, what locals can afford the recreation at an elevated level at Tahoe? Health care workers, land managers, civil service employees with at least a B.A. degree, ect… might be a significant amount of the players. Maybe the problem is these low paid service workers are not happy. And most certainly these professional, higher paid, elevated performance local athletes don’t bring their smile often enough to that visitor as a service employee.

  6. paul middlebrook says - Posted: July 17, 2015

    So….from the comments, someone actually thought that article may any sense at all?

    As I read it, I thought I was having a stroke.

  7. SCTahoe says - Posted: July 17, 2015

    Nothing but word salad. It is almost a sport in this town to criticise and find problems. The world is exactly what you make it and most people are right where they have chosen to be.

    To criticise without offering solutions is complaining…or these days refereed to as Op-Ed. Town is packed with new businesses popping up faster than I have seen in a long while. Roll up your sleeves, pull up your pants and get to work.

  8. Dale says - Posted: July 17, 2015

    Perry, this is one of the few times you have made any real sense and have absolutely hit the mark. Too many businesses are trying to cut costs to make a profit not just to make ends meet. It takes an investment in having a proper inventory if you want to have a product the customer wants to purchase. Here in Tahoe the product is service and the inventory is staff to provide it. Paying a low wage is the same as investing in shoddy goods to place on your shelf. Nobody wants them. Thus you cut back more and the goods get worse and you wonder why your profits are down. The cycle continues until your store front is the next empty one on the street. A fairly paid employee has money to spend which makes them happier. In all probability they will spend it right here in town which makes the merchants happier because they now see a return on their investment. (Reganomics?) I have lived and worked here a long long time and have seen and experienced the attitude “What the @#$% do they expect for $8 an hour?” enough to know. You get what you pay for.

    Gary, after rereading the article a few times I still do not understand exactly what you are trying to say. Perhaps you should accept the fact that “The Glass is Twice as Big as it Needs To Be” It is more important as to what is in it than how full it is.

  9. Garry Bowen says - Posted: July 17, 2015

    Thanks for the comments, but I thought I’d clarify a bit, as I don’t want Paul to have a stroke just because he doesn’t understand something. . .

    ‘Cranky Gerald’ implied not knowing of my background, so under those circumstances, I appreciate his confidence in saying I was “on point”, so he (& Paul, too) deserve a answer to that, as so often (especially in some of these responses,folks wonder where another is “coming from”). . .

    I started working for Bill Harrah at the age of 15 (the namesake on the building, not the corporate bean-counters driving it down absent an appropriate sense of what built the enterprise in the first place: service). . .& left 10 years later in Public Relations (taught by the best), so am intrinsically aware of that industry, as well as its’ new-found foibles. . .

    I am subsequently degreed in both restaurant management & Culinary Arts, so can in fact speak to the service issues experienced by so many of our visitors now, as operators seem intent more on being 90-day wonders than actually being concerned with a guest’s experience – and it shows. . .

    I also have an extensive background in business, & am now also of service to Tahoe’s significant environmental issues, having trained myself in policy issues that we all are so concerned about, as another attraction that keeps people interested in what we do. . .offering the beauty that we do.

    For Paul, in easing his mind & heart, it is revealing that this culture, by virtue of a recent NYT investigatory piece, concluded that 72% (!!) of the middle-management in this country is “disengaged” from their duties, reflected in my observational comments on ‘paying attention’, in being aware of what’s actually happening in your establishment, above & beyond reaching any ‘numbers’, or figuring out reasons why it’s not working the way you told the boss it was going to . . . all take time, not very well spent in serving your public.

    So, to Dale, I’m saying that some (not all) of the corporate environment that now exists here is not as responsive to their clientele as their corporate reports (to each other) say they are, but that there are some of those guests that know that’s the case, but are not the one’s that are asked – those that’re the ones not asked are among those that may comprise a significant extra % on the balance sheet, but will not, because management remains unaware of, & inattentive to, the continual replacement of either the product or the help, instead of improving both as needed.

    One will never hear from those dissatisfied, a death knell.

    So, your own comments suggest that reality. . .so, a wake-up call is necessary. . .which at least some comments say is true. . .

  10. SCTahoe says - Posted: July 17, 2015

    IF you ever had to make a payroll in Tahoe you would know that it is a 90 day race. Then the rest of year is spent trying to not lose that hard earned cash. The bottom line is very much the controlling reality here.
    The other side of that 90 days is every employer having to double or triple the size of a team in only a few weeks and getting staff trained to survive the onslaught, let alone trained to actually sell something. All the while knowing that a large percentage of these new team members will be going back to school in mid to late August or have already banked enough money to buy that ticket to Thailand.
    So I stand by my comments that it is easy to criticize without offering solutions. There are many business owners and managers that are working their front lines and pinching their pennies in the hopes of making a years salary in 90 days and being able to stay open for another year.
    I agree that there is a lot of room for improvement on the hospitality front in this town. But your commentary comes across at the same level as a Yelp review; absolutely useless in the real world with no real understanding of what it takes to even open the doors these days.
    And Paul does understand. We all have resumes similar to yours…

  11. luna49 says - Posted: July 17, 2015

    Look to IVGID as an example of a group who invests in their employee training re guest services. In a mandatory training as they have for all employees, much of what this writer correctly describes as poor service could be greatly mitigated. I experience this poor service as a local anytime going out in the SLT area with a few exceptions, like Sprouts, which gives great service and a positive vibe. Perhaps the Chambers could contract w IVGID to give a season training to all new employees in the SLT market, thereby relieving the individual business owner of a daunting task.