Opinion: Dying for a cure for metastatic breast cancer
By Kelly Shanahan
Sometimes it takes an earthquake to wake you up. My personal earthquake jolted me on Nov. 14, 2013, when I was diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer. My carefully constructed world came crumbling down; I could no longer perform surgery, the core of my life as an ob-gyn; the plans for eventually retiring and traveling blew away like dust in the wind; and, most devastating, there loomed the real possibility I would not live to see my daughter, the light of my life, graduate from high school.
Metastatic breast cancer means that rogue cancer cells escape the breast and take up residence elsewhere in the body. There is no cure and less than a quarter of those diagnosed live five years. No one dies from early stage cancer, yet less than 7 percent of cancer research dollars is devoted to metastatic research. That 7 percent figure covers all types of advanced cancer. In October, everywhere you look there is pink, but little if any of those pink ribbon products do anything to actually find a cure for a disease that kills 40,000 American women and men every year — 108 wives, mothers, sisters, brothers, fathers, and, yes, doctors every single day.
I’ve never been average and I plan to beat the statistical average life expectancy after a diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer, because 32 months just isn’t long enough to accomplish everything I am meant to do. I haven’t finished my job as a mom or a wife. I am passionate about bringing attention to and increasing funding for metastatic breast cancer research.
The latter is why I’m writing this in LAX, on my way to Washington, D.C., to lie down in front of the Capitol to draw attention to metastatic breast cancer. MET-UP is an organization founded by fellow “lifers”, women (and men) like me who are living with metastatic breast cancer, knowing that unless more is done, we will die long before we should. Modeled on ACT UP, the activist movement born of the AIDs crisis of the 1980s and early 1990s, this group is designed to shake things up and demand action. Our first action is a “die-in” on Oct. 13, Metastatic Breast Cancer Awareness Day, the one day out of 31 devoted to the only breast cancer that actually kills.
I won’t just be lying on the Capitol lawn: I’ll also be meeting with Sen. Barbara Boxer’s staff to discuss what can be done to further research into metastatic cancers. Federal funding for cancer research has been cut, and even if further money cannot be obtained, redistribution of current cancer research dollars to metastatic research can make a huge difference. The SEER database, run by the National Cancer Institute, collects information on cancer diagnosis in the U.S., but SEER does not gather data on conversion from early stage to metastatic cancer. Without such basic information, it is impossible to accurately gauge the extent of metastatic disease or know whether current treatments improve life expectancy. Ideally, with more information and more research, one day there will be a cure for the only breast cancer that kills, metastatic breast cancer.
When the earthquake strikes, the survival instinct kicks in. You will claw your way out of the rubble to see the light of another day. You will kiss your family goodbye and fly 2,500 miles across the country to meet with others who have experienced the same upheaval in their lives. You will join hands and lie down to honor the 40,000 who have died every year over the past 30 years, a number that has not decreased despite all the awareness and the pink. You will do this in front of the Capitol, to demand action because those of us living with metastatic disease deserve more; we deserve the chance to see another sunrise, to cheer at a graduation, cry at a wedding, and maybe even hold a grandchild’s hand. On Oct. 13 be aware that we are, quite literally, dying for a cure.
Kelly Shanahan is a 21-year resident of South Lake Tahoe and the owner of Emerald Bay Center for Women’s Health. She has been living with metastatic breast cancer for nearly two years. A mom, a wife, an active member of our community, she continues to work part time as a gynecologist.
Abstract: Experimental evidence accumulated during the last decade supports that cannabinoids, the active components of Cannabis sativa and their derivatives, possess anticancer activity. Thus, these compounds exert anti-proliferative, pro-apoptotic, anti-migratory and anti-invasive actions in a wide spectrum of cancer cells in culture. Moreover, tumor growth, angiogenesis and metastasis are hampered by cannabinoids in xenograft-based and genetically-engineered mouse models of cancer. This review summarizes our current knowledge on the anti-tumor potential of cannabinoids in breast cancer, which suggests that cannabinoid-based medicines may be useful for the treatment of most breast tumor subtypes. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737212001399
Kelly – Great that you are going to Washington to protest funding for cancer research… it is not just about breast cancer, much less metastatic breast cancer… it is about all cancer that the NCI and NIH have had research funding cut. As a 20 year breast cancer survivor, research advocate trained by the NCI and National Breast Cancer Coalition, I will disagree with you that early stage breast cancer does not kill. It does! When not diagnosed and treated – it metastasizes and kills! While your diagnosis is metastatic (for which I am so sorry), I wonder if your early stage breast cancer went un-diagnosed for too long? As I am sure you know, most breast cancers are slow growing, with the exception of the wild ones like Inflamatory Breast Cancer. (There are MANY forms of breast cancer!)
Years ago, I contacted you to try to set up breast cancer educational opportunities. No response. After your most recent post on LTN, I sent a personal email to you offering to set up a local educational advocacy site (low energy) for the folks in SLT and I never had the courtesy of a response. That said, I would suggest that you engage your efforts beyond your own situation, and use your background in women’s health to educate your patients and the SLT community about breast cancer. It is always more rewarding when you share more than text about issues that are important to you. You have the education and ability to really improve local breast cancer awareness and advocacy in the community, which would bring you credibility and satisfaction. I hope you will consider doing this instead of pleading your own case. It would be a great lesson for your daughter as well – as she needs to know more about breast cancer, and whether your cancer is genetic or not.
By the way – I have been on the steps of the Capitol in DC (before they closed them off) fighting for breast cancer research funding… I have lobbied with the National Breast Cancer Coalition, AACR and AICR for funding, and fought the fight. Get out there Kelly and fight the fight for your community, your patients and your daughter. It is not all about you.
Kelly, my hope is that you do beat the odds: our bodies are designed for healing, and the mindset is so important.
I am proud of you for making the journey to DC to be a part of shaking up the system.
Illness can be a teacher, companion or challenge. Sometimes the message isn’t clear. So be mindful of being positive in all that you say and do, and know that each of your thoughts, and deeds has the power to heal you.
Be well.
Well said Irish. I too am a 12 year cancer survivor, though of a less lethal type. My closest friend is a 20 year cancer survivor who still requires constant treatment.
Folks need to remember President Nixon’s war on cancer that is now over 40 years old and ongoing. It will be a hundred or thousand year war until, hopefully, all cancers and other serious diseases are conquered.
Kelly,
So proud that you are fighting this with such bravery! You are a fantastic person, mother, wife and my favorite OBGYN.
I was not aware that this particular Cancer was not a big part of Breast Cancer research. I will help spread the word too!
You go girl!❤️
Love,
Carla
Oh, and Irish, this should not be your forum to bash. After all, this is not about “you”.
Thank you Kelly.
Let me know if I can help in any way.
ErnieClaudio@sbcglobal.net
In my opinion and experience, Western Medicine, including the AMA and the FDA don’t want a cure for cancer of any kind. There’s too much money in continuing to treat it as compared to a cure. I ignored their advice and took my chances with the cancer I have 30+ years ago. After surgery I used wheat grass therapy for 4 years (based on the book “How to Save Your Own Life” instead of having radiation which they assured me- would have killed me- thanks to Lorna Cannon- for the book)
I am the longest survivor on the planet with the type I have- that they have found, so far. However it is back and needs to be removed again. It’s unbelievable that there’s so little progress in over 3 decades.
We all need to push for funding for all cancers. Hopefully someday this society will find it’s way to the cures that Mother Nature gave us and not just the ones cooked-up in a lab.
It’s about “all of us”.
GOD BLESS YOU KELLY,I ALSO AM A SURVIVOR,AND CANCER SUCKS BIG TIME, WITH ALL THE MONEY THAT HAS BEEN COLLECTED IN SO MANY YEARS,WE SHOULD HAVE HAD A CURE BY NOW, I REALLY THINK THERE IS ,BUT IT WOULD PUT MANY PEOPLE OUT OF A JOB,I AM LIVING THE BEST I CAN,I ALWAYS THINK POSITIVE MORE THEN EVER NOW ,AND KNOWING SOME DAY THEY WILL OPEN UP AND SAY ,CANCER IS OUT OF THE WAY NO MORE CANCER ,CANNABIS FOR ME IS A CURE ,AND IT DOES HELP ,GOOD LUCK KELLY.I CAN BEAT IT ,IT WONT BEAT ME.WITH CANNABIS ITS KNOCKING IT OUT,IT WORKS.
Steve Kubby,
There is certainly some interesting research on cannabinoids and cancer. I’d love for the federal government to fund more studies on high CBD/low THC strains. The work on the Charlotte’s web strain with childhood seizures is pretty darn impressive.