THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Tesla founder energized about firm’s future


image_pdfimage_print
J.B. Straubel talks about Tesla's plans in Northern Nevada and beyond. Photo/Mike Wolterbeek/UNR

J.B. Straubel talks about Tesla’s plans in Northern Nevada and beyond. Photo/Mike Wolterbeek/UNR

By Linda Fine Conaboy

RENO – Although it’s nice to be able to drive 250 without an electronic fill-up, all good things come to an end, as do all electric charges. The question of where to get a charge has been nimbly addressed by Tesla with the invention of their supercharger units with a DC connection allowing for a quick charge (30 minutes) at a series of superchargers strategically located coast-to-coast.

There’s one in Truckee, and the company is adding charging stations daily to accommodate not only Teslas, but all electric vehicles.

J.B. Straubel, Tesla’s co-founder and chief technical officer, gave a talk Oct. 11 at UNR titled Building a Clean Energy Future: Tesla and Nevada.

He spoke about his passion for electric vehicles, an interest he developed when he rebuilt a discarded electric golf cart at age 14. He also spoke about his electric Porsche 944 that had a world electric vehicle racing record. His interest in electronics led him to Stanford University where he earned a bachelor’s degree in energy systems engineering and a master’s in energy engineering. He teaches an energy storage integration class at his alma mater.

As co-founder of Tesla, Straubel has overseen the technical and engineering design of the company’s vehicles, including the Tesla Roadster, the Model S series and just-launched Model X. He said plans are in the works for another car, this one to be more affordable than other Teslas, with a price at about $35,000.

“We were not founded to build expensive cars,” Straubel said. “Our mission is to build affordable cars.” The company is working on what he called a first generation roadster, the Model lll, which will have a 200-mile range.

Still in his 30s, the dapper entrepreneur chronicled Tesla’s meteoric rise from 2003 and a mere 15 employees to its current complement of 13,000.

“We had a new idea in 2004—performance electric cars. It took a lot of effort to change people’s perceptions,” he said. That new idea led to the Tesla Roadster, powered by what was becoming a new era in automobiles—the lithium-ion battery.

Tesla began production of the Model S in 2012. Photo/Linda Fine Conaboy

Tesla began production of the Model S in 2012. Photo/Linda Fine Conaboy

What the company needed next, he said, was a car that could compete with gasoline powered vehicles; thus the Model S series was born in 2012, built around a battery pack that literally rides on the floorboard of the car permitting a huge increase in cargo capacity and offering added safety because there’s no motor in the front. In fact, the Model S carries the highest safety rating in the United States, Straubel said, receiving Motor Trend’s car of the year award in 2013.

The new Model X rides on the same platform as the Model S, but it is an SUV with a range of 250 miles on a single charge, falcon-wing doors and a 5,000-pound towing capacity. While there was a display of cars in front of UNR’s Crowley Student Union building where Straubel spoke, the Model X was unavailable for viewing.

He explained that in order to fulfill company ambitions and its enormous appetite for batteries —they consume 10 percent of all batteries produced — Tesla needed a more ready source as well as a supply line closer to home. Most batteries now come from Asia. By 2020, that battery appetite is expected to grow as Tesla expects to sell 500,000 cars within the next five-year period as well as battery packs for home and commercial use.

“We thought there must be a better way to build batteries, so the gigafactory came into being,” Straubel said in reference to the huge production facility being constructed in Storey County in the Tahoe Reno Industrial Center east of Reno and Sparks. “We’re making a $4.5 billion investment and will eventually employ 6,500 people full time, building batteries that are self-contained from an emissions point of view.”

Straubel said the plant would be powered by renewable energy sources. “It’s a net-zero energy factory.”

The main mission of the factory is to drive down costs of storage, Straubel said.

“The energy source must be sustainable to power an energy-sustainable car. The missing links are renewable and sustainable [energy]. The goal is to eliminate 100 percent of fossil fuel energy usage. Many say eliminating fossil fuels is an impossible goal. They said that about the Model S too,” Straubel said.

“Sustainable energy is this generation’s moon shot challenge,” he said, referencing the moon landing in 1969. “The sustainable energy race is a race against ourselves. We see the movement to sustainable energy as our biggest goal.”

The Northern Nevada facility is being built in phases as needed. He expects to see the first wave of employees move in in a few weeks.

In 2015, there were more than 600 internships at Tesla and about one-third of them were converted to full-time employees. They’re launching a new internship especially for the gigafactory.

“We’re here to stay, we don’t want a workforce that’s imported from somewhere else,” he said. “And as many people as we can bring on board and recruit from the local community, it makes that tie even stronger.”

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (7)
  1. Kay Henderson says - Posted: October 15, 2015

    I wonder if a quick charge station located at South Lake Tahoe would add to our competitiveness as a destination resort. I would think it wouldn’t be profitable. Perhaps a case where a government agency (the city?)could grease the path, generating profits in the future?

  2. Garry Bowen says - Posted: October 15, 2015

    Having had an extensive tour of the Tesla project a few months ago, I’d like to deal with Ms. Henderson’s query (wonderment) – 1st of all, South Lake Tahoe already has multiple charging ‘stations’, not all of which are Tesla – several are at Heavenly (CA Lodge), at Harvey’s, at Marriott, at Hyatt, etc. as folks driving a ‘six-figure’ car are on marketing radar…

    They will be distributed nationally (300 super-chargers by the end of this year), placed within 200 miles of each other, all across the nation. . .

    The upshot is, that as they are all within Tesla’s shortest range of 260 miles, the ability to go anywhere in the U.S. for NO fuel costs (none !) – to their owners, but also to civilization – as the fuel costs to them are zero as well (they’re all solar-powered), are then combined with not needing gas stations needing to be served by 18-wheel tankers full of petroleum, not needing the acreage of gas stations needing to bury the large tanks in the ground. . .will end up to be an unmistakable bonus…

    His partner company, Solar City, (now over 100,000 roofs, with a shift to large commercial accounts (IKEA, WalMarts, etc.) will provide a very strong business model above & beyond both “Detroit” & the energy grid, as solar-equipped homes who also have electric vehicles (not only Tesla) will no longer need to access ANY gas station, & the aggregate number will be high enough to offset the current need for more expensive grid &/or transmission lines, currently the source of most power company lobbying. . .

    Elon Musk is making the change inevitable, as well it should be. . .

    A freer (non-damaging) energy source, free to its’ users, (giving the Earth a break in the constant drilling, fracking, refining of the increasingly damaging use of fossil fuels) means that Tesla is one of the very few corporations actually ‘walking the talk’ of reducing CO 2…

    Government subsidies (tax credits) already exist, but the extra benefits of cleaner air, less pollution, less toxicity, are all benefits that make these particular tax credits valuable to society, in reducing the need to correct ‘damage’. . .in that way, this direction is already “profitable”. . .and which will only get better. . .

  3. Peter says - Posted: October 15, 2015

    The 50’s drive in comes to mind as the perfect location for a quick charge station. It’s in town, the car ports are there begging to be used, just a thought.

  4. Garry Bowen says - Posted: October 15, 2015

    Peter:

    Actually, that’s a great & innovative idea, as superchargers reaches the limit within 30 minutes, so the ’50’s Drive-In’ would be a lot more fun & substance than merely ‘loading up’ on chips, sodas & beer at a service station, “convenience store”, or 7/11. . .

    ‘Fuel’ for the car & driver within 30 minutes, one of which one pays for, the other being free. . .

    What a concept ! . . . & within the spirit of Tesla’s cultural shift. . .

  5. Cranky Gerald says - Posted: October 15, 2015

    Mr. Bowen-

    If I read your post accurately, you opined that fueling the electric cars of the future is and will be without cost to the owners. How does this work?

    Who pays for the station, who pays the distribution and generating costs for all the renewable energy and bill on the electric meter that is going to be obviously attached?

    Are the middle class, (what is left of us anyway), and the economically distressed, unable to afford new electric cars, going to be paying for Joe and Josepine high bucks to cruise the continent for free?

    Further, I don’t want to sound like chicken Little Chicken little, but I ask your thoughts on any future affects caused by the diversion of solar energy and wind energy from its present application to the earth by nature.

    The diversion of the energy of the sun and the winds can not be a free lunch. Solar power diverted to fueling Teslas and other electric needsetc will not be available to warm the earth and create photosynthesis in plants and warm the earth’s water.

    Diverted wind energy may have a tangible effect on weather patterns downwind from the diversion. This is unknown, but could have large effects on agriculture and the food supply.

    What are your thoughts on the areas of the earth where access to the suns rays is compromised by prolonged seasonal darkness?
    Do they just have to move.

    Finally,I think your statement quoted here that after all the solar panels are in play we “will no longer need to access ANY gas station, & the aggregate number will be high enough to offset the current need for more expensive grid &/or transmission lines” is more than a little naive.

    Are we hopping out of the frying pan into the fire over time?

  6. Sam says - Posted: October 16, 2015

    Quick charge station for tesla’s would be pro. I’ve seen a ton of tesla’s around town lately. Those are the tourists we should be working to attract.

  7. reloman says - Posted: October 16, 2015

    There is a charging station at libert6 energy also. There is a company out there that will put in charging stations for free(I know of one lodging property that is looking into it just waiting on permits) However they will be charging the consumer for the recharge.
    GarryI think there will be very few people that will get theirrelectricity for free
    (There is no free ride anywhere if a business installs a charging system they will charge for it in some way, either in increased pricing or more business. They have to make more money to offset the cost of instal, power and maintaince.
    I am wondering if our electric grid is strong enough to support all of the electric cars. It wasnt too long ago that we were having statewide brown outs, and i dont think we have brought that many new plants on line.