THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Peregrine falcons on the rise in Tahoe


image_pdfimage_print

Publisher’s note: This article first appeared in Tahoe In Depth and is reprinted with permission.

By Will Richardson

It’s August at Lake Tahoe, the peak of shorebird migration, and the low water level means ample beach and mudflat habitat at the delta formed by the Upper Truckee River and Trout Creek.

Sandpipers and plovers of a dozen species are spread out along the beach, feverishly fueling up for the next leg of their southbound journey, when suddenly — panic. The birds alight, coalescing into a swirling aerial ball, fragmenting and reorganizing. The swarm stretches and splits into two groups as a peregrine falcon slices straight through the middle of the flock, plucking an indecisive straggler along the way. It’s a thrilling spectacle, but less common at Tahoe until recent years.

The peregrine’s name means “wandering falcon” and it has the most extensive natural range of any bird species on the planet. Prior to the Comstock era, it is likely that peregrine falcons were regular breeders in, and certainly would have been regular migrants though, the Lake Tahoe region. An 1877 report by the U.S. Geological Survey describes the species as “met with frequently in early fall.”

As recently as the early 1940s, peregrines were known to nest at Echo Summit and Cave Rock, but over the course of the next several decades, the species experienced precipitous population declines around the world due to the use of organochlorine insecticides like DDT, aldrin, and dieldrin.

A peregrine falcon eats a band-tailed pigeon near Sand Harbor. Photo/Will Richardson

A peregrine falcon eats a band-tailed pigeon near Sand Harbor. Photo/Will Richardson

The approximately 3,875 breeding pairs of peregrines in North America prior to the 1940s declined to 324 breeding pairs at their lowest point in 1975. DDT use was banned in the U.S., Canada, and most of Western Europe by the early 1970s, but it took many years to bring the species back from the brink.

One method used to promote rapid population growth and expansion was captive breeding and hacking. Nestling birds hatched from captive breeding programs (often involving falconry birds in the case of peregrine falcons) were reared in a wooden box to help protect them from predators and weather, and these boxes were placed at unoccupied but otherwise suitable nesting sites, typically a high cliff, a couple of weeks prior to fledging. Once the birds had been at the site for five to 10 days, the box was opened, giving these birds the freedom to move around the site, flap their wings, and build strength.

Biologists provided the birds food throughout the hacking process, but there was minimal contact and biologists often used hand puppets to simulate feeding behavior of adult birds. From 1985 through 1991, 18 juveniles were released at two hack sites in Tahoe, one at Luther Rock and one at Eagle Falls. All 18 birds successfully fledged and dispersed, and the program was considered a success, though where these birds ultimately dispersed to is anybody’s guess. Migrants and presumed transients would steadily increase during the 1990s and 2000s, but it was 22 years since the last hacking effort at Luther Rock before peregrines were confirmed to be breeding again at Lake Tahoe.

In 2007, peregrine falcons were observed in late summer near both South Maggies Peak and Angora Peak. Further investigations revealed that a rock-climbing biologist had observed a peregrine at Luther Rock in 2006. In 2008, the wildlife crew of the U.S. Forest Service Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit began monitoring potential nesting sites based on a 1980 nesting survey, and the following year a nest was found at Luther Rock.

What’s more, the pair at that nest successfully fledged two young. By 2011, a second nest was discovered at Castle Rock. In 2014, a third nesting pair was confirmed at Cave Rock, and this summer a fourth nest was found at Eagle Lake. Thanks to heroic efforts on a shoestring budget, the wildlife crew at LTBMU has managed to confirm that each of these locations has remained active since they were first found, typical of the species, and a minimum of 20 juveniles has fledged at Lake Tahoe over the last seven years. This is truly an impressive rebound for the peregrine.

Birders and biologists rejoice at the return of the peregrine to Tahoe. Their great speed and hunting skill can be exhilarating to observe. As Forest Service biologist Shay Zanetti points out, “they add an exciting element to the basin ecology.” But perhaps more importantly, they belong here.

Now we need to make sure we can sustain all of these breeding predators, and foraging habitat may prove limiting. Peregrines prefer to hunt water birds and were once known as “Duck Hawks” in this country.

Prior to the construction of the first dam at Tahoe City in the 1860s, there was far more shorebird and wetland habitat distributed around the lake’s shoreline. Extensive beaches and mudflats were perhaps more consistently available from year to year. Now the best waterfowl and shorebird habitat has been reduced and concentrated into a few small pockets, especially when the lake is full.

Thus, we need to consider the peregrine falcon, perhaps nesting miles away on some craggy cliff side, when setting policy that can affect the bird population at a given location. That’s why it’s important for dog owners to keep their pets on a leash at the Upper Truckee Marsh or many of Tahoe’s beaches. But it also applies to forest management practices that might affect band-tailed pigeons, Steller’s jays, Northern flickers, or other birds the peregrine relies on for food. To support a healthy population of peregrine falcons at Lake Tahoe, we need healthy populations of the other bird species as well. Based on the recent trajectory of peregrine recovery at Tahoe, it appears things are looking up.

Will Richardson is co-founder and co-executive director and director of applied science at the Tahoe Institute for Natural Science.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (8)
  1. J says - Posted: December 22, 2015

    Beautiful News, now a few Wolves

  2. 4-mer-usmc says - Posted: December 22, 2015

    About a month ago I twice saw a peregrine falcon sitting on a pine branch in a tree located right off my back deck. You couldn’t miss the body shape and the stripes–what a great sight!

    Spouse – 4-mer-usmc

  3. Walter C Reinthaler Jr. says - Posted: December 23, 2015

    J, you do not want wolves roaming Tahoe. It seems romantic until oets and a small child come up missing. There is no predators for wolves and they will kill everything.
    The falcon comeback is in the balance of nature and very cool to see one up close. Wolves not so much.

  4. Robin Smith says - Posted: December 23, 2015

    Not an expert here but Wolves are not indigenous to the Lake Tahoe area. They are not like coyotes and do not adapt to humans.

    If there are wolves here I suspect humans brought them and they are probably have been bred with dogs/coyotes.

    Someone with the wherewithal could tell us more!

  5. Lisa says - Posted: December 23, 2015

    Robin and Walter, your posts set me off to explore the wolf habitat (thank you!) and I contacted a Wildlife Ecologist friend asking about the historical range of wolves. This is what I got back and it surprised me too. There have only been two fatal attacks in all of North America in the last 15 years. One in Canada and one in Alaska. Don’t think I would worry too much about small children being killed.
    “The historical distribution of wolves in California is not well understood. But Grinnell (founder of Museum of Vertebrate Zoology – MVZ, at Berkeley) Dixon and Lindsdale (1937) the bible for the historic distribution of mammals in the state mind you, “Unquestionably wolves ranged regularly over the northeastern one-forth of the State and south along the Sierra Nevada to Inyo County at least…”

    More recent archaeological research confirms Grinnell, Dixon and Lindsdale’s conclusion and in fact they were too conservative in estimating the wolf historic range in the state.

    see:

    “In modern times we talk about wolves being ecologically important,” said Amaroq Weiss, a West Coast wolf organizer at the Center for Biological Diversity, “but this research shows us that wolves have been a part of California’s cultural heritage for thousands of years.”
    The researchers found that 15 Native American languages across California use separate and distinct words for wolf, dog and coyote, indicating their range and presence across the state. One such group is the Ohlone people who, in their San Francisco dialect, referred to the wolf as ‘maial’.

  6. Robin Smith says - Posted: December 23, 2015

    Lisa…TY for your research!!!!

  7. Walter C Reinthaler Jr. says - Posted: December 24, 2015

    Lisa,

    Way to get the facts. I still have some doubts about wolves so close to a population center like Lake Tahoe.

  8. Blue Jeans says - Posted: December 24, 2015

    There are pre Gold Rush stories about wolves and Grizzly bears duking it out over a whale carcass in Monterey Bay.
    Both mammals once roamed the state.

    You can’t get close to a wolf if you want to. They don’t want to get close to you. Ask the daily wolf watchers in Yellowstone. They set up every morning and afternoon with high-powered telescopes just so they can see wolf activity. Sometimes a wolf will come close to the road in order to cross but that is a fleeting moment easily missed if you blink or glance away.