THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Conner seeks to have judge dismissed


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

Because JoAnn Conner believes the judge in her case against the city of South Lake Tahoe has already made up his mind, her attorney is trying to get the matter heard before another judge.

This means the hearing scheduled for today isn’t going to happen.

Conner, who is a first-term city council member, at the end of last year took legal action against the city and City Manager Nancy Kerry in regards to being censured by her colleagues and being banned from talking to staff.

JoAnn Conner

JoAnn Conner

“The law requires a judge not be biased and not to have predetermined the outcome of the case. If evidence arises where it appears to an ordinary person on the street that the judge has made a predetermination on an issue of the case or outcome of the case, it is essentially automatic disqualification because the litigants are entitled to a fair and unbiased judge,” Jacqueline Mittelstadt told Lake Tahoe News.

Mittelstadt, who used to be city’s attorney, is representing Conner.

At the Dec. 15 hearing, El Dorado County Superior Court Judge Steve Bailey said he would not deal with the censure issue because it is a political matter and not something for the court to decide. That is where Mittelstadt and Conner believe there is bias, and why they’ve asked Bailey to be replaced.

If Bailey is replaced, the matter will likely be heard on the West Slope.

If Conner were to prevail, she would likely have censure overturned – though the council could redo it. A censure is a hand slap with zero consequences when it comes to being able to do her job. She would also be given access back to the city offices as well as be able to directly communicate with staff via phone, email and in person.

Today, she can still have questions answered, but they must go through the city manager and/or city attorney.

The council has a card key to access the offices at the airport. However, it has been inconsistent through the years when it comes to which councils have had the access. It is up to the council to decide if they have the card keys.

Councilman Hal Cole on Dec. 30 turned his card in.

“If we need to see someone, we can make an appointment,” Cole told Lake Tahoe News.

Mayor Wendy David said, “I usually don’t need to even use it.”

Council members have a mailbox behind the locked doors. There is talk of moving those into a public area, though the boxes would be locked. This would alleviate the need to bother city employees to get the mail.

Multiple emails were sent to City Clerk Suzie Alessi asking about the history of the card keys and why councilmembers have access. She didn’t respond to the inquiries.

Mittelstadt maintains she and Conner are willing to work with the city to resolve the matter outside of the courtroom.

“After the litigation was filed, the Thursday before the City Council’s closed session, [City Attorney] Tom Watson called me. During that conversation, we discussed possible resolution with my providing a variety of suggested approaches. He said he would get back to me. He never did,” Mittelstadt said in an email. “After the first hearing on the matter, in light of the judge’s direction telling us that we should resolve the matter, I approached their outside counsel and referred to what the judge said. I indicated that we would be happy to discuss options to try to resolve the situation, and had tried to do so prior to his involvement. He said he was new to the matter but would consider it and get back to me. I have not heard from him either. Until the city is willing to come to the table and discuss resolution, we have no choice but to proceed with the litigation.”

Watson told Lake Tahoe News it was not accurate that no one from the city has responded to Mittelstadt. But he would not elaborate because he said it would be inappropriate to do so because he works for all five electeds.

“I have heard nothing from Jacqueline and as I said before we are proceeding within the court process of the suit,” David told Lake Tahoe News.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (16)
  1. Robin Smith says - Posted: January 4, 2016

    Does anyone know how many votes Connor got when she was elected to office.

    The article says that the ‘outside’ attorney represents all 5 elected council members. However I understand that the City Manager is NOT an elected position.

    Then the $100,000.00 the City has appropriated/set aside for this crap….how many ‘outside’ attorneys are going to divy this up?

    Who is who here…very nasty business and ALL city business should be put on hold until it gets straightened out.

  2. Relo says - Posted: January 4, 2016

    Robin you misread the article Tom Watson who is the city Attorney said he represents all 5 council members is not the outside atty. You may look up election results on the county election office website.

  3. Dee says - Posted: January 4, 2016

    What a waste of our taxes. Would much rather see this money go towards repairing roads than this BS.

  4. Robin Smith says - Posted: January 4, 2016

    Relo TY

  5. Robin Smith says - Posted: January 4, 2016

    Relo……Just spoke with a really good…old timer attorney friend of mine who is going to look at the City of Lake Tahoe. Since 1965 he has been listening to me ramble about the 60’s and 70’s here.!

    He will read some of this for me as I do not have the wherewithal. I;m not stupid but I’m not an attorney or a politician.

    Since the ‘local civil maffie’ seems to have such a grip and so many MILLIONS are being nefariously ‘shuffled’ an outside group is definetley going to take over.

    There needs to be a moratorium on City business until the people find out what the H*** is going on here.

    The reason I asked about the voter numbers that some significant number of people MUST have voted for JoAnn Connor….if she is such a bad one how did she ever get elected??

  6. Mel says - Posted: January 4, 2016

    Win, lose, or draw the lawyers will get paid.

  7. Robin Smith says - Posted: January 4, 2016

    There are plenty of lawyers in jail.

  8. Rooster says - Posted: January 4, 2016

    Once again your right and everyone else is wrong.
    A great public servant your turning out to be?

  9. Rick H says - Posted: January 4, 2016

    I have to say I am confused. I suspect, most knew she was completely wacked (and it is becoming clear with every action she takes), so how in the heck did she get elected?

    Rick

  10. 4-mer-usmc says - Posted: January 5, 2016

    While perusing the protocols for the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council online, I happened across the “Procedures for Censure of a Council Member” (page 14) and the last paragraph of that section on page 15 states the following: “In accordance with Government Code section 995, upon request of a Council Member, the City shall reimburse the Council Member’s reasonable attorney fees and costs in defending himself/herself.”

    I suppose Ms. Conner will eventually request reimbursement from the City to pay for her legal fees billed to her by attorney Jacqueline Mittelstadt, and if team Conner/Mittelstadt don’t agree on the City’s interpretation of the dollar amount of “reasonable attorney fees”, then the next lawsuit will be over that.

    It seems that neither Conner nor Mittelstadt have any real incentive to bring this matter to a conclusion since Mittelstadt can just continue racking up billable hours and Conner might be thinking she won’t be out of pocket for any legal fees and the City/taxpayers will pay those.

  11. 4-mer-usmc says - Posted: January 5, 2016

    admin:

    Thank-you for your response. I re-read the article you referenced and while it said that Mittelstadt had been paid for Conner’s legal costs associated with the Censure Hearing I didn’t see anything specific about Conner being unable to attempt further reimbursement associated with a lawsuit after the fact. The portion of the Protocols that I read stated that the City shall reimburse the Council Member’s reasonable attorney fees and costs in defending himself/herself which is somewhat vague, but it did not specify that those were only for censure related costs. That may be addressed elsewhere in the City’s regulations, and I hope that you are correct and I am incorrect as I’d certainly like to see this matter reach closure.

  12. admin says - Posted: January 5, 2016

    The censure fees are automatic, so to speak.

    If Conner prevails in regards to the litigation, she may ask the court to direct the city to pay all of her legal fees.

    They are two distinct issues.

    LTN staff

  13. 4-mer-usmc says - Posted: January 5, 2016

    admin:

    Thank-you for the clarification.

  14. Blue Jeans says - Posted: January 6, 2016

    She looks so proud of herself. When this mess is over with there will be some other community blessed with her presence.