THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Stalled luxury housing complex in Stateline set to break ground at mobile home park site


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

Luxurious, high-end housing on the shores of Lake Tahoe designed to be second or third homes for the wealthy – presumably from the Bay Area – is set to break ground in summer 2016.

The project isn’t new. It’s been stalled because of the economy and the inability of the developers to secure financing.

Tahoe Beach Club, when it is built out, will include 143 units, a private 40,000-square-foot beach club on the water, restaurant, spa, workout area and facilities for banquets-parties-weddings. The club will offer memberships to the public.

It will be built in three phases, with occupancy expected to be ready in 2017. This will include 46 units, the clubhouse and gatehouse. Completion of the project will depend on how sales go as well as loans. If all goes according to plan, Tahoe Beach Club could be built out in 40 to 44 months once construction starts.

All of this will be built at the end of Kahle Drive in Stateline. By summer the remaining trailers at Tahoe Shores Mobile Home Park will be gone. The remaining residents have been given notice.

The project has been controversial since 2002 when the trailer park changed hands and the owners made it known the current residents would have to move.

Mobile home residents will need to have different lodging in spring 2016. Photo/LTN

Mobile home residents will need to have different lodging in spring 2016. Photo/LTN

“On the human side we want to do the best we can,” Tom Castaneda told Lake Tahoe News. He and Bob Mecay are the principles of Tahoe Beach Club. “We’ve met with every single one and told them the good news. I can give them some direction, which they have been looking for for 15 years.”

The developers will be responsible for helping with relocating the remaining 11 coach owners. There are also about 30 trailers that are being rented.

Part of the approved plans call for turning apartments on the street into deed restricted low income housing in which many of these people would qualify.

Castaneda would not put a price on the units, but mentioned how new high-end construction not on the lake is going for between $900 and $1,000 per square foot. These units are expected to be between 1,250- and 3,500-square-feet. On the low end that is $1.125 million. All will be whole ownership.

The duo doesn’t regret delaying the project.

“If we had gone into the market in 2009 when it was first approved, it would have been a disaster. I think it would have been extremely difficult to get construction financing. If we had gotten it, it would have been hard money and leveraged strongly,” Castaneda said.

During this time there has been some work done on the property. A nearly 160-foot pier, part of which is floating, has been installed.

More recently the Kingsbury General Improvement District pump house that was near the beach has been moved to the far southwest section of the property near where the current entrance to the trailer park is. A larger building had to be built to meet certain codes and regulations. Tahoe Beach Club gave KGID an easement on the property for the new structure.

Another advantage to the delay is being able to keep with contemporary design and interior features. While neither the footprint of the property nor the height of the buildings is allowed to change per the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency permit, the look and interiors can. There can also be fewer units, just not more.

“We can decide what the market is calling for,” Castaneda said.

Final architectural renderings are not complete.

IMI has been hired to be the sales team – the same company that sold Martis Camp and Lahontan in the Truckee area. Presales are likely to begin in the spring.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (24)
  1. Robin Smith says - Posted: January 13, 2016

    Then and Now?…Bill

  2. Robin Smith says - Posted: January 13, 2016

    That was a great beach in the ‘day’.

    Hydroplane races Bill Harrah’s Tahoe Miss

    Bill Harrah LOVED speed.

  3. Robin Smith says - Posted: January 13, 2016

    Hydroplane races were watched from that beach!

    Bill Harrah’s Tahoe Miss…Bill Harrah loved speed.

  4. M says - Posted: January 13, 2016

    So sad. People actually live there year round and enjoy the beach and trail right at there back yard. Now you want to kick them out so people can use it maybe once or twice a year? All so the owners can make a buck? I understand it’s all about making money to these people but this is our home. We don’t enjoy seeing luxury homes sit vacant on our beautiful land. Either leave the trailers or knock them down and give the beach and land to the public.

  5. Liberule says - Posted: January 13, 2016

    You’re too poor to live here now.

  6. Robin Smith says - Posted: January 13, 2016

    Liber….learn how to make beds, cook and keep the lawn…nanny the children/drive and you’ll do just fine.

  7. a_better_SLT says - Posted: January 13, 2016

    It’s a sad day as the last affordable lake front housing is now gone. If they actually follow through with real affordable housing down there it will be a little less sad…

  8. Shellbaby says - Posted: January 13, 2016

    I have seen this all over the West. Locals are priced out, move to outlying communities and bussed back to serve the rich and entitled. “Money talks and BS walks”. It’s the American way.

  9. Robin Smith says - Posted: January 13, 2016

    Shell…at least there is a JOB for you to get bussed to.

  10. sunriser2 says - Posted: January 13, 2016

    They could name the project Bad Karma Bay. Three owners ago the landlord made the renters an offer to subdivide the park and sell all the existing owners the land under their homes.

    Would have been just about the same cost as what they were paying in rent at the time.

    They started fighting among themselves about the price of the lake fronts being the same as the lots at the entrance.

    The deal fell apart and they new owners doubled then tripled the rent.

  11. Isee says - Posted: January 13, 2016

    Robin- I don’t know if people here will be fine with the skills you describe. The people in my neighborhood who hire help to do all their manual work, the license plates of their workers – are all from Nevada. It must be a requirement. I tend to think that people may be ashamed to hire their neighbors, to do manual work and menial tasks. Either that, or they are paying cash and don’t want anyone to know that they are rolling in dough but unwilling to participate in our societal agreements- like people getting a paycheck or a 1099 form. Sad situation.

  12. sunriser2 says - Posted: January 13, 2016

    They can’t afford to register or insure their cars in CA.

  13. Robin Smith says - Posted: January 13, 2016

    This trailer park is in Nevada is it not? Douglas County?

  14. sunriser2 says - Posted: January 13, 2016

    Park is in NV Isee is in CA.

  15. Sam says - Posted: January 13, 2016

    Trailer parks are a poor solution to housing. I’m watching everyone complain but no action up top on tackling the out of control housing issue. I won’t win the powerball, but if I do I’m going to build NICE low income housing.

  16. Cranky Gerald says - Posted: January 13, 2016

    This is a Nevada situation and the City of SLT hopefully does not have an angle to use to screw it up.

    It is too bad that some people have been a bit screwed over, however, a trailer park is not really appropriate housing for our altitude and snow depths. Watching crews shovel roof tops from trailer coaches tells you all you need to know about their suitability.

    I do believe that there is a higher and better use for this parcel than what is planned.

  17. sunriser2 says - Posted: January 13, 2016

    We should kick all the people out of Tahoe Verde and build multi million dollar condos.

    Just think of all the added tax revenue for the city to waste.

  18. Robin Smith says - Posted: January 14, 2016

    sun get rid of the city…then they can’t WASTE your money:)

  19. Hmmm... says - Posted: January 14, 2016

    “…get rid of the city…”

    Huh??

  20. Robin Smith says - Posted: January 14, 2016

    Hmmm…It’s been done before.

    Apologies for no citations

  21. Toxic Warrior says - Posted: January 14, 2016

    This 143 unit project with a 40,000 sq ft Beach Club is approved right on the lake – but TRPA chose to severely limit residential construction scattered through out the basin in the 2012 RPU ? What that tells you is TRPA is in bed with big developers for fees ! TRPA needs a Grand Jury Investigation to expose them for corruption and favoritism

  22. rock4tahoe says - Posted: January 16, 2016

    Robin. I remember one “hydroplane” crashed and killed the driver, Lee Taylor, in 1980.

    Back to the article…
    If anyone remembers, those Kahle apartments were complete dumps and so were the trailers.

    Yes. Lake Tahoe is following the Big Bear, Vail, Sun Valley and more model of the wealthy property take-over. The average price for a home in Placerville is $290k and flat while in SLT it is $380k and rising.

    Perhaps a gondola from Placerville to Tahoe?

  23. Robin Smith says - Posted: January 16, 2016

    rock

    Kelmont East 1966 and the stories do not hold a candle to the truth.

    I still like the tunnel idea but then several posters have totally debunked that idea.

  24. rock4tahoe says - Posted: January 16, 2016

    Robin. The tunnel project from Twin Bridges to Meyers is not “debunked,” it is simply to expensive with current technology. Future laser technology may bring the costs down.

    I find the tunnels of Yosemite to be a better comparison; built in granite etc. However, they were built in the Depression Era with cheap labor. I think they are magnificent though.

    Final note. It is interesting that in Europe they were able to build a tunnel under coastal waters to link Britain with Europe.

    They also built the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland while our Collider in Texas was cancelled in the early ’90’s via budget cuts and a lack of interest.