THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Year-round hockey academy moving to Meyers


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

Meyers is about to be home to the Tahoe Hockey Academy.

The year-round facility for boys and girls in middle or high school is expected to break ground this summer. The building permits from El Dorado County are in hand. The project is on the consent agenda of the May 25 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Governing Board meeting.

“We are looking at initiation on the upper dorm as early as June and the first academic year starting in August,” Mike Dill of Aspen Environmental Services told Lake Tahoe News.

Dill works for Tahoe Hockey Academy, the group that is looking to move onto the property to create a year-round sports school.

The existing residence would become a dorm, with another 7,000 square feet added to it. A second two-story building will be 13,193 square feet, which will be part dorm, dining hall, kitchen and exercise room. In all, about 90 youths would live there, along with eight residence assistants.

A tennis court, which has been previously approved and graded, but not built, would be converted into a mini ice rink in the winter for 3-on-3 practices. The ice rink in South Lake Tahoe is where they would have full team practices, as well as games.

“The academy will follow the school year – August to May. Then the facility will operate summer camps for groups of 20 to 25 kids,” Dill said. “Basically it’s a prep school and prep academy to get them academically ready for college and physically ready to play Division 1 hockey.”

The 3,800-square-foot residence was erected years ago. This is a legally existing, non-conforming use. Converting the use to a recreation facility will bring it into compliance.

Some Meyers residents are starting to question why this project seems to be getting approved without the usual scrutiny.

“The previous approvals are part of the parcel’s history. It doesn’t mean we don’t do the same level of review,” Paul Nielsen, planner with TRPA, told Lake Tahoe News. “It’s on the consent calendar because until recently there was no known concerns about the project.”

When the notice about the project went out to neighbors this month letters started coming in to TRPA. Noise and water supply are two of the main concerns so far.

In 2006, the 16.4-acre parcel known as Echo Creek was permitted to be a recreation group facility for about 200 people. The infrastructure was put in, the lower loop road built, grading for the tennis court is done, with the basketball court already in place. In fact, 80 percent of the grading for the academy is complete, which includes tree removal.

The problem is the owners at the time – Alex Graf and Paul Gardner – could not find a user. Both men have since died and their trusts are left dealing with the parcel at the bottom of Old Meyers Grade.

In 2012, Lake Tahoe Wildlife Care seriously considered relocating there, but a deal could not be reached.

Tahoe Hockey Academy, which is run by a group of investors, is leasing the property, with an option to buy.

Noise, traffic and vehicle miles traveled have been studied.

“We will have full size buses to shuttle kids to tournaments; passenger vans to get to the rink (in South Lake Tahoe),” Dill said.

There will be 44 parking spaces for general use, and nine for employees. The thinking is because of the age of students most will not have a vehicle at the academy.

Dill does not anticipate the academy having any impact on those who walk-run Old Meyers Grade, especially because the academy will not use the street for parking. The gate will stay where it is.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (5)
  1. Carl Ribaudo says - Posted: May 23, 2016

    Alex and Paul would have loved this.

  2. cautious and skepical says - Posted: May 23, 2016

    Please be aware that TRPA listed this item in the Consent Calendar. Consent items are stated to be routine and non-controversial and will not be discussed as an individual item by the Governing Board (GB). This item is neither routine or non-controversial and should have been noticed to the public for open discussion at the May 25, 2016 Governing Board meeting or better yet, on an agenda when the GB meets on South Shore.

  3. cautious and skepical says - Posted: May 23, 2016

    Also be aware the “notice” that went to residents in the area did not come from the County or TRPA. Someone just happened to see it listed on TRPA’s agenda for approval next week and notified others. That no one knew about the project is probably why there were no “known concerns.” Plus, the studies are said to have been done for a 1995 permit, meaning they are over 20 years old.

  4. JJ says - Posted: May 24, 2016

    I am so saddened by the negative things being said about this project. My name is JJ and I am the founder of this Academy. As and inner city youth who made it out of the storm of street life through the game of hockey and attending summer camps in Tahoe as a youth. My dream was to create and safe environment in this wonderful community that would allow youth’s from all over the opportunity to a better quality of life. I am very big on community and being part of one’s surroundings. Thats why I volunteer at the Tahoe Ice Arena coaching the young players.

    I think the bottom line is that many are uninformed about what is happening here in Meyers. There is little to no additional traffic, our players reside on campus and are carpooled by our bus daily, students are not permitted to drive during the school year while in attendance.

    Folks, Meyers has the opportunity to be part of a historical project as the first ever residential Hockey Academy on the west coast in history. Meyers has the opportunity to provide a home to youth athletes from around the world who are trying to achieve the dream of playing college or even professional hockey. We have a chance here to further put Meyers on the map, just like our Sochi Olympians.

    You can’t tell me we are a community that does not support the positive development of our youth, you can’t tell me we are worrying about hearing coaches motivate young children as they work towards their dreams or upset about hearing the joyful cheers of players that have just accomplished something wonderful.

    I have done my research on Meyers prior to obtaining this property and none of my research could’ve predicted a community that turns their cheeks to a place that houses a young athletes dreams. None of this makes sense, it takes a community to make something shine, why fight something that makes our community shine even brighter?