THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Opinion: Housing is a communitywide issue


image_pdfimage_print

By Joanne Marchetta

Like many communities that are highly-desirable places to vacation and live, Lake Tahoe has affordable housing problems. Two recent studies commissioned by the Tahoe Prosperity Center and Tahoe Truckee Community Foundation clearly illustrate the housing challenges our region faces.

Median home prices of more than $500,000 on the North Shore and nearly $400,000 on the South Shore are simply too high for our region’s low wages, putting the cost of home ownership and even rent out of reach for many working people.

Joanne Marchetta

Joanne Marchetta

Lake Tahoe has been a world-renowned recreation destination for decades, a short day drive from major metropolitan areas like Sacramento, the Bay Area, and Reno, all of which are growing and have affordable housing challenges. This proximity to areas with much more diverse economies and much higher wages is reflected in our housing stock, as more than half of the houses in the Tahoe basin are vacation homes. Many are used only occasionally by their owners and sit empty the rest of the year. Others are rented out as short-term lodging for vacationers.

Full-time rentals are scarce and often unaffordable for many people who live and work at Lake Tahoe, and for other people who must commute into and out of the Tahoe basin each day because they cannot find affordable housing or adequate employment here. Hundreds of deed-restricted affordable housing units have been built at Lake Tahoe, but they are at full occupancy, with waiting lists of one to two years for new tenants.

Affordable workforce housing is a complex, challenging issue here at Lake Tahoe and elsewhere. We are not alone in facing these issues and there’s a renewed spirit today in Tahoe to tackle the challenge.

California is wrestling with this difficult topic as we speak. At a summit in Los Angeles this month, local governments, housing advocates, and state leaders met for a broad forum on California’s housing woes. In many areas, housing has not kept pace with population and job growth. A shortage of affordable workforce housing now threatens to hamper the state’s economic recovery. It is also creating environmental and transportation problems as people commute long distances to and from work.

A shortage of workforce housing options is having similar impacts here at Lake Tahoe. Thousands of people commute into and out of the Tahoe basin each day because they work here but can’t afford to live here, or because they live here but can’t find adequate employment at Tahoe. Companies and agencies struggle to recruit and retain workers because of high housing costs. Many of our full-time residents are struggling financially to stay in their communities, with housing prices and rents continuing to climb even as wages remain low and stagnant.

These housing challenges are not unique to Lake Tahoe, or even to California, which had a median home price of $514,000 in September, according to the California Association of Realtors. Many mountain communities in the American West depend on tourism as their main economic driver and have comparatively low service sector wages like Lake Tahoe. Many also have high land and utility costs, high construction costs, and limited areas available for any new housing development to occur, all of which make building affordable workforce housing a challenge.

Lake Tahoe has some unique challenges in providing affordable housing. Some point to our development rights system and the allocations needed for housing, commercial, and tourist lodging projects as one obvious barrier. These systems were put in place decades ago to protect Lake Tahoe’s unique natural environment from overdevelopment. TRPA is leading an initiative to fully examine and improve the development rights system, not only for housing, but to help spur the type of redevelopment projects we now need to restore our environment, revitalize our economy, strengthen our communities, and improve the overall quality of life here for everyone.

The 2012 Regional Plan took clear steps to allow the coverage and density needed for new housing and mixed-use redevelopment projects in our town centers. Affordable multi-family housing projects do not require any development allocations, and there are hundreds of housing bonus units available for these types of projects. These incentives are used only sparingly, indicating that while we do need to improve Lake Tahoe’s unique development rights system, there are clearly also other issues involved in solving our workforce housing challenges, including the need for economic revitalization to increase wages and career opportunities for working families.

We at TRPA are encouraged to see a growing conversation about affordable workforce housing at Lake Tahoe, and to see people pushing for continued dialogue and solutions. The Tahoe Truckee Community Foundation is working to form a regional housing authority to help address workforce housing issues on the North Shore. We hope to see that initiative succeed and be mirrored on the South Shore. Challenges and solutions will likely differ around the lake.

TRPA stands ready to help solve Lake Tahoe’s affordable workforce housing challenges, and to partner with local governments, nonprofit groups, and residents to find creative solutions. There is no one silver bullet to solve these complex issues, and no one agency or group that can fix them all on its own. But by strengthening our collective will to work together on this important issue and be creative, we can make needed change happen.

Joanne Marchetta is executive director of the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (5)
  1. M Elie Alyeshmerni says - Posted: October 21, 2016

    I struggled to understand the opinion piece. Maybe it is too early.
    With the best of intentions , the TRPA, THE CONSERVANCY, and at times the League applied the brake rather than the more difficult task of guiding towards proper development through the permit process. The housing crisis is inadvertently caused by these agencies. Any cost has to be passed on unless you have money to burn. Those additional costs Willy Millay end up on the shoulders of the everyday consumer.

    The sooner the lucrative for the agencies commodities that are essential to live and work here disappear and are replaced by planning guidelines the sooner you will see growth and prosperity here.

    People working full time here not being able to live here either in apartments or homes I has to be unacceptable to all.

    Joanne, you can make a difference. Please do. There is a lot of support for it.

  2. Robin Smith says - Posted: October 21, 2016

    M Elie….You struggled to understand the opinion piece? Possibly because it was written in blah blah blah intentionally? They do not want normal average people to live here. It takes a person 3 to 5 years living somewhere BEFORE they start to invest in the community Therefore “they’ need the workforce to ‘turn’ over every 2-4 yrs so the powers that be can keep control.

    There are many seriously corrupt people operating here and just like a HOLE full of snakes it will take some time to ferret them out.

    More and more the voters are beginning to realize THEY have to get rid of the SNAKES!!

  3. M. Elie Alyeshmerni says - Posted: October 21, 2016

    Robin
    Thank you for your attempt at an exclamation.
    Based on your characterization, you and I must be traveling in different circles.
    I have lived in Iran, Minneapolis and Los Angeles.
    Nowhere have I seen the dedication to the environment and the welfare of the community that I’ve seen here sometime to the point of zealotry.
    It is in such environment that constructive criticism is acceptable and hopefully effective.

  4. 4-mer-usmc says - Posted: October 21, 2016

    “TRPA is leading an initiative to fully examine and improve the development rights system, not only for housing, but to help spur the type of redevelopment projects we now need to restore our environment, revitalize our economy, strengthen our communities, and improve the overall quality of life here for everyone.”

    What this opinion piece did not mention is the TRPA’s three [3] year estimated time period for them to perform their examination of the development rights/commodities systems which they created. Once they’ve completed their examination how many more years will it take for them to develop a policy, vet the policy, for the TRPA Board and public to finally agree to a policy, determine an implementation method for the policy, Board approval of the policy, initiate the policy, and then derive any results from the policy?

    If the SCHEDULED “Pathway 2007 Update” which turned into the “Regional Plan Update of 2012” [only after extreme public outcry for the TRPA to get that completed along with the threat of NV withdrawing from that bi-state agency] is any example of the speed with which the TRPA moves, then perhaps this non-scheduled exercise might be completed by about 2030, if we’re lucky. That is far too long a time period to help spur the type of redevelopment projects we NOW need to restore our environment, revitalize our economy, strengthen our communities, and improve the overall quality of life here for everyone.

  5. Robin Smith says - Posted: October 21, 2016

    First M Elie…the travelers come to me…and my EXPLANATION comes from my 1st hand observations of the people and circumstances observed here personally and professionally for a period of more than 60 years.

    You’re welcome

    P.S. LOTS OF SNAKES HERE

    P.P.S. ZEALOTRY is a dangerous word