Why are coyotes so polarizing?
By Lawrence Lenhart, High Country News
First things first: Coyote. When you read the word, how many syllables do you hear? Your answer, according to Dan Flores, author of Coyote America, may be “immediately diagnostic of a whole range of belief systems and values.” The ki-YOH-tee versus ki-yote divide is one of the best indicators of a person’s coyote politics, a nearly hard-and-fast way that we subconsciously identify ourselves: as defenders of the species, in the case of the former, or as a manager, shooter and/or trapper, in the latter.
In “Coyote America,” Flores occasionally assumes the mantle of coyote’s head of public relations, demonstrating how the species, once “dead last in public appeal — behind rattlesnakes, skunks, vultures, rats, and cockroaches,” overcame its stigma as “varmint” to become a darling among the very people who most infrequently encounter it — modern-day urbanites.
More often, though, Flores is content to serve as a guide to the species, relaying the coyote’s complicated natural, cultural, political and mythological histories. It is why Flores describes his book as, “in most respects, a coyote biography.”
Most people don’t realize just how important coyotes are as it pertains to public health and vector borne diseases that are hosted and vectored by ground nesting rodents. Coyotes eat well over 1,000 rodents per year, and the majority of those rodents eaten by coyotes here in the basin can vector Plague (chipmunks/golden mantel squirrels/CA ground squirrels), or Hantavirus (deer mice). Our Sierra Wildlife Coalition website (sierrawildlife.org) has some excellent info on coyotes and beavers.