THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Letter: Time to fix South Lake Tahoe’s roads


image_pdfimage_print

To the community,

As a proud longtime resident of South Lake Tahoe, I find it embarrassing that our community has not been able to take care of our roads. From a lack of sidewalks to enormous potholes and cracks, our roads are dangerous and need to be fixed.

Measure C is the right way to finally address the repairs that our roads desperately require. Measure C will ensure that, for the first time in our city’s history, there is dedicated, stable funding that can only legally be spent improving our roads. Visitors to South Lake Tahoe will pay their fair share for the use of our roads, and every penny would remain local. By keeping pollution out of Lake Tahoe and ensuring that emergency vehicles can respond quickly and efficiently to emergencies, Measure C will go a long way toward fixing the dilapidated roads that are blight on our community.

The choice is clear – a vote for Measure C is a vote for better roads and improved public safety. Our roads have been a problem for far too long, and these necessary repairs are only going to get more expensive as times goes on. I have returned my vote-by-mail ballot with a yes on C vote, and I hope you will do the same.

Cheryl Caplan, South Lake Tahoe

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (2)
  1. Irish Wahini says - Posted: November 5, 2017

    Cheryl, it is not up to “the community” to take care of the roads… It is the RESPONSIBILITY of the City Council to budget & take care of essentials — like road repair. Snzzzzzzz

  2. Carl Ribaudo says - Posted: November 5, 2017

    I don’t see the point in road funds coming from the city budget which impacts local residents only when we can tap into visitors to pick up a significant part of the tab. In fact it makes no sense. Where else can city residents put up 30-40% of the tab and other people’s money pick up the rest? If it comes out of the city budget residents pick up 100% of the tab. Just makes no sense from a cost perspective.