THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

SLT’s dysfunction stalls recreational marijuana


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

Recreational marijuana, while not extinguished in South Lake Tahoe, is having a hard time getting out of the starting gate.

At the March 27 City Council meeting Sergio Rudin with the law firm of Burke, Williams and Sorensen said he had all he needed to write an ordinance that would be ready for the council’s review on April 17.

The issue was brought back two weeks sooner – and without an ordinance to dissect. Mayor Wendy David has asked for recreational marijuana to be on every agenda until the issue is resolved.

The council on April 3, with the absence of Brook Laine, talked in circles – again. In the end, they told Nira Doherty, attorney from the same law firm, not to bring back an ordinance. Instead, David said she would meet with Councilmember Jason Collin and acting City Manager Jeff Meston to get their questions answered.

For more than three hours last week Collin, David, Meston, Doherty, Police Chief Brian Uhler and planning director Kevin Fabino talked. A lot of questions were answered, but the council members are not completely sure where they stand on everything.

Collin appears to want information spoon fed to him. At the April 3 meeting he admitted, “I’m probably the least educated on this.” He later said, “This is not the biggest priority of my life. I am not going to do homework on my own.” Then he added that he has read some things about recreational marijuana.

The reality of being on any elected body is that everything on the agenda is supposed to be a priority because the electeds are doing the public’s work and their job is to do what the public asks. The public is asking for a recreational marijuana ordinance. The electeds are the ones who set policy, not staff, so they must come up with the substance of the ordinance.

Part of the delay is that recreational marijuana is new to California. And while other states have legalized it, each state has its own rules. And being in Tahoe, the city has to deal with constraints imposed by the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency.

The uncooperative working relationship among the five electeds is also impacting the process. They also all don’t seem to trust staff. This is bogging down the process.

Then the council is being told by one attorney that an ordinance can be written, while a different person sitting in that chair at the next meeting says more information is needed.

Complicating matters is city staff is not in agreement and let their differences be known for all to hear at the last council meeting. Doherty and Fabino are in disagreement about zoning laws, especially when it comes to micro businesses. This just adds to the confusion for the council when it comes to being able to make a decision, and for the public to trust the process and future decisions.

Micro businesses are a hiccup in the process that still needs to be addressed, and in large part will dictate how any ordinance is written. While the community working group recommended not starting with micro businesses on Day 1, members said revisiting the issue in a year or so would make sense.

Councilman Austin Sass has advocated for them since the get-go, saying this is a better route for South Lake Tahoe and the individual businesses. It means the businesses would be able have multiple licenses bundled into one, and essentially be self-contained. One example is that they could grow, distribute and sell the product.

Recreational marijuana will be back on the April 14 agenda. The ultimate goal is to have an ordinance that will stand up in court. It remains to be seen when an actual ordinance will be forthcoming.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (3)
  1. The Irish Wahini says - Posted: April 11, 2018

    Dysfunctional is a kind word for how the City of SLT operates! It is scary! And, the November election can’t come soon enough! But we need help now! We have no City Attorney – only TEMPs who don’t even agree with each other! Jeff Meston was smart to give back his Acting City Manager assignment so he could keep our underfunded (yet fantastic) Fire Department in-tact! We have no leadership! Scary!

    I hope the community is canvassing for City Council candidates who can learn how to run a city, instead of being figure-heads that won’t learn or can’t learn about the issues put before them! At least the Three Stooges were entertaining! This situation is NOT funny!

  2. Scott Ramirez says - Posted: April 11, 2018

    This echos the experience we had with SnowGlobe discussions. Despite publicly and repeatedly providing full documentation of existing regulations, Council members deferred to staff and seemingly refused to review the materials provided. Wendy David did question if regulations were being met but seemed to accept “I believe they are” from the opposition lawyer with nothing more than his word as evidence. She had previously asked the attorney of the city to “look into it” but no report was ever publicly presented by the attorney and we can only guess if this was ever researched. Only after the TRPA got around to reviewing a complaint filed two months prior did someone from the City ever discuss these regulations and that was at the request of the TRPA. All of our “negotiations” happened outside of City staff who then collected the results and presented them to the public as a great achievement. The honest truth is that the changes to the SnowGlobe event happened because SnowGlobe was willing too do so despite having no contractual reason to do so. Parks and Recreation was the only City group that was responsive in any of our discussions. The remainder of our City may as well have not existed as far as our discussions went.

    We can only expect disfunction given the removal of the City Manager and our Attorney on the way out. The City Council needs to provide a clear map of how these roles will be filled with timelines. Until then, they need to do their part and do the required research, whether they are interested in the subject matter or not. These people chose to run for these positions and even went so far as to sue to keep the decision making out of public hands. You do not get to sue and say you know better and then claim disinterest in doing the job after the fact. Honestly, get to work, you signed up to do this, no one forced you there. Lead, follow or get out of the way.

  3. The Irish Wahini says - Posted: April 12, 2018

    AMEN Scott! Lead or get out of the way! The only City Council person who seems to know his responsibilities as a leader is Tom Davis. I truly hope some candidates are out there who are interested in making South Lake Tahoe a functional municipality that provides a platform to citizens to resolve problems. So far – this is not happening! They should never have pushed Nancy Kerry out the door! She made things happen as best she could under the heavy hand of a dysfunctional Council.