THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Californians turning to fake grass


image_pdfimage_print

By Rob Kuznia, Washington Post

HERMOSA BEACH — Christopher Knight makes no apologies: He likes a green lawn. But the actor best known for playing middle son Peter on “The Brady Bunch” also wants to do his part to conserve water.

The solution? Fake grass.

“It feels totally different,” Knight, 57, marveled one day last week, stepping barefoot onto a deceptively lifelike expanse of newly installed plastic turf. “Frankly, I’m not really sure why more people haven’t started doing it.”

After four blistering years of drought in California, more people are doing it. The fake grass business is booming, much to the chagrin of some environmentalists and live-grass purists.

Comprehensive numbers are hard to come by, but makers and installers of synthetic turf say they are experiencing an unprecedented spike in residential business in California. From middle-class families who don’t want to forfeit the patch-of-green part of the American dream to megawatt celebrities who are mortified by TV coverage of their sprawling water-hog lawns, homeowners across the Golden State are ripping up sod and replacing it with plastic.

Read the whole story

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (5)
  1. tahoeadvocate says - Posted: May 26, 2015

    Does the TRPA recognize that synthetic tuff is not ground coverage? Water runs right through it.

  2. Hmmm... says - Posted: May 27, 2015

    @Advocate: I didn’t see the TRPA mentioned anywhere in the article. Are they pushing this plastic lawn stuff?

  3. Kit's Carson says - Posted: May 27, 2015

    Fake Grass just like fake people in LA. It goes hand in hand….or under foot in this case.

  4. tahoeadvocate says - Posted: May 28, 2015

    Hmmm— I’d heard quite the opposite. Fake grass was being considered as ground coverage the same as a structure.

    It doesn’t make sense to me as the artificial turf I’ve seen allows liquids to run through similar to real turf yet they require no water use to keep it looking good.

    I hope I’m wrong.

  5. Hmmm... says - Posted: May 28, 2015

    The article didn’t mention any local agencies, which was the source of my question to you. I agree with you and Kt’s- it’s PLASTIC for God’s sake! I wonder why people don’t just xeriscape?