THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Opinion: Monitoring drought, El Nino’s affect on Tahoe


image_pdfimage_print

Publisher’s note: This originally was published in the TERC newsletter and is reprinted with permission.

By Geoff Schladow

It seems that every conversation about Lake Tahoe this year made reference initially to the ongoing drought, and more recently to El Niño. What is certain is that we are in a long and historical drought. What is also certain is that there exists a band of very warm water across the equatorial Pacific Ocean – the condition known as El Niño. Whether the El Niño conditions will have a significant impact on the drought, particularly in the northern Sierra, is largely unknown.

Geoff Schladow

Geoff Schladow

Historical precedents are relatively few in number, and the data are divided between El Niño years when the northern Sierra received above average precipitation and years of below average precipitation. More certain is the likelihood that temperatures will be above average, increasing the chances of rain at the expense of snow, whatever the total precipitation may be.

What does all this mean for the lake? This year the lake fell to more than 18 inches below its natural rim. While that does not seem very much, the very low slopes in some parts of the lake meant that the water’s edge receded many hundreds of yards exposing brown mud and rocks, and shrubs started growing and flowering in previously submerged areas. With the lack of nutrients and erosion products washing into the lake, it has also been far clearer and bluer during the drought.

Will the lake refill this year? With an average precipitation year, the lake will rise slightly above the natural rim next spring, and the Truckee River will flow once more. With summer evaporation, however, the lake level will fall and the flow will cease. It will take more than one wet year to overcome the consequences of the drought.

Extreme events such as droughts can teach us a lot about our efforts to restore Lake Tahoe. During this period we have seen how many feet of clarity improvement are achievable in a single year; that the lake’s blueness is reflected in our ability to control nutrients; and that the attached algae on rocks has fallen to relatively low levels. While scientific measurements are recording these changes, it is the detailed research that we undertake that provides the understanding of what is driving change, and that understanding allows us to construct predictive tools that can guide future restoration. That understanding does not always come quickly or easily, but through the efforts of many we are moving forward.

To all who have contributed to our accomplishments this year, I am truly grateful. This includes our incredibly hard-working staff, our volunteer docents, the many students and interns that work at TERC, our partners in other research institutes and our colleagues in the various Tahoe agencies, those who visit our education centers, and those of you who have helped fund our research and education programs and partnered with us in unique ways.

I wish you all a safe and peaceful holiday season, and look forward to hearing how the lake refilled far quicker than I predicted.

Geoff Schladow is director of the UC Davis Tahoe Environmental Research Center.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (13)
  1. Tahoebluewire says - Posted: December 17, 2015

    Go back to Davis punk.

  2. Mansoor Elie Alyeshmerni says - Posted: December 17, 2015

    Thank you Dr Schladow for your continuous thoughtful research on the lake. I for one rely on your information and am glad we have scientists such as you devoting your time to how we may improve lake clarity and quality.

  3. Robin Smith says - Posted: December 17, 2015

    Mansoor…Geoff should be talking to the ‘native’ population of Tahoe if he wants historical data about the Lake.

    The Tahoe Keys built in the 1960’s is the MOST DAMAGING INTRUSION on LAKE SHORE in HUMAN HISTORY….HUMAN HISTORY!!!

    The ‘Keys’ are still there, destruction of 50% of upper Truckee Marsh which is the PRIMARY FILTER for Lake Tahoe.

    Well we shan’t speak of that…well you can’t change THAT…WELL is a deep subject.

    P.S. Native Americans were Indians….they had brown faces and straight black hair

  4. Nic Lighter says - Posted: December 17, 2015

    Happy holidays Dr Schladow I look forward to reading your research, you are trustworthy and truthful and these characteristics are few in the tahoe basin

  5. Mansoor Elie Alyeshmerni says - Posted: December 17, 2015

    Robin, can we agree that Dr Schladow had nothing to do with the creation of the Tahoe Keys fiasco. As to the role of the native Americans, I can assure you that a scientist of his caliber knows where to get information. Nowhere in the opinion piece did he say that he discounts information from native Americans.

    Clearly , ad hominem insults reveal information about the writer not the target.

  6. Robin Smith says - Posted: December 17, 2015

    Nic…Dr….’you are trustworthy and truthful…’

    would have been a fine comment worthy of reading and appreciated BUTT then you had to be a moron and screw it up with the unneeded unwanted snarky additional..

    ‘these characteristics are few in the Tahoe basin.’

  7. Robin Smith says - Posted: December 17, 2015

    Mansoor…and nowhere does anyone including Geoff, want to address the #1 problem, not that there are not many issues, given that, #1 remains the TAHOE KEYS.

    Someone needs to be truthful about that and address a solution to that issue.

  8. Kits Carson says - Posted: December 17, 2015

    I’ll take more water into the lake than clarity any day. What next? Stop all tributaries into the lake so we can see a whole 75ft? Its a normal/natural process for runoff to disturb some clarity. It will all settle in time.

  9. Atomic says - Posted: December 17, 2015

    Can we all agree that Robin Smiths comments are largely to be ignored as they ramble aimlessly, are non-sensical and generally divert from specific topics.

    Robin, please stop. This is not Facebook.

  10. Robin Smith says - Posted: December 17, 2015

    Atomic….. tahoebluewire says …”go back to Davis punk”

    and you think I should stop commenting?

  11. Nic Lighter says - Posted: December 17, 2015

    Just my opinion here, but the road and land managers as well as the regulators can’t be trusted to provide an unbiased assessment of the environmental problems in the basin. A snarky perspective? Yes indeed but after seeing the implentation of the EIP my snarky ness is justified

  12. J says - Posted: December 17, 2015

    Miss Smith is 100% right regarding the lake damaging/killing beyond belief Tahoe Keys

  13. rock4tahoe says - Posted: December 19, 2015

    Kits. Lake Tahoe Clarity is a big issue. And for the record, John LaCante measured 108′ of clarity in 1873 using a 9.5″ dinner plate. 1873 was right in the middle of the major Forest clear-cut era of Lake Tahoe.