THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Regulators deal a blow to Nev. rooftop solar industry


image_pdfimage_print

By Daniel Rothberg, Las Vegas Sun

With no discussion, state regulators this week voted unanimously to slash the value of credits rooftop solar customers earn for generating excess energy.

The three-member Public Utilities Commission adopted a proposed order that would reduce by 75 percent the amount NV Energy pays customers for excess power their solar panels produce and change the flat service rate for customers with solar panels. The changes in so-called net metering policies would phase in over four years, starting Jan. 1.Regulators deal a blow to rooftop solar industry

The PUC’s position in the order is that higher bills are being paid by nonsolar users to provide “hidden subsidies” for those with solar panels. The PUC said solar users in Southern Nevada have been getting an annual subsidy of about $623. The subsidy for solar users in Northern Nevada is about $471.

Read the whole story

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (6)
  1. Moral Hazard says - Posted: December 25, 2015

    The PUC was right to do this. It also means that STPUD is very wrong to reduce monthly fee for water service and bill for water use. And STPUD is being dishonest in stating that the current rate structure is required by metering.

    The result of STPUDs current rate structure is that locals who actually use water are subsidizing second homeowners who rarely use water…..but have the same access.

    STPUD is a pipeline company.

    NV Energy is a electric line company.

  2. Lou pierini says - Posted: December 25, 2015

    Moral, STPUD is in CA. The PUC in the article is in Nv.

  3. Moral Hazard says - Posted: December 26, 2015

    Yes Lou, that is correct. I was referring to the economic reasoning…..

  4. Atomic says - Posted: December 26, 2015

    Dead right Moral. Prop 17 also states that public utility customers cannot charge more than their actual cost for their products. Charging in a tiered rate structure MUST be supported by the associated costs , not by multi- level punishment program for heavy users. Reverse engineering tiered use rates by STPUD only illustrates the need to subsidize bloated benefits and pay packages. It’s disgusting.

    Specific to the article, rooftop solar customers in Nevada are generating power, fed back into the grid. Exactly how is that an unfair ‘subsidy’ ? They are being paid a wholesale rate for the electricity they produce. This is power industry pretzel logic.

  5. Moral Hazard says - Posted: December 27, 2015

    Atomic it is the same principle. People end up reducing the cost they pay to less than it takes to maintain the electrical line hooked to their house. That means people without solar are subsidizing people with solar.

    NV energy sells electrical transmission capacity as much as they are selling electricity.

  6. Julie Threewit says - Posted: December 27, 2015

    Way to kill progress NV PUC.