Environmentalists dismayed by governor’s corporate turn
By Michael J. Mishak, Los Angeles Times
SACRAMENTO — Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s efforts to give a boost to corporate California are colliding with his image as an environmental crusader in his final days in office.
Administration officials say their moves are needed to protect jobs in a fragile economy. But environmentalists are dismayed by what they see as a feverish push to limit restrictions on toxic chemicals in retail goods, ease key air pollution rules and permit the use of a known carcinogen to treat soil in strawberry fields.
The Sierra Club grumbles that the governor’s plan for implementing the state’s landmark global warming law is a giveaway to industry.
The administration’s maneuvering highlights a tension present at the outset of Schwarzenegger’s tenure: the environmental activist versus the business executive.
Schwarzenegger spokesman Aaron McLear said the governor’s environmental record is indisputable, citing big strides he has made in curbing greenhouse gas emissions under the landmark global warming law, AB 32, signed by Schwarzenegger in 2006.
“This governor has implemented the most historic aggressive environmental regulations in the country and sometimes the world,” McLear said. “It’s just not credible to argue otherwise.”
But activists say they are sorely disappointed by some of the governor’s recent moves.
“I think they’d rather take heat from some environmental groups and some scientists than they would from Dow, DuPont and Exxon Mobil,” said Bill Allayaud, director of government affairs for Environmental Working Group, an advocacy organization focused on toxic chemicals.
Arnold, with his fleet of Hummers, wasn’t really an environmentalist. He made some good moves towards legislation that would help California environment, but in the end corporations and business will win him over. He mentioned being in Obama’s cabinet so he could continue working on environmental issues. I think not, Arnold.
Just like his empty promises to “clean house” in state government with his broom, “cutting up” the credit cards of wasteful government spending, blowing up the boxes and so on… just more hot air by another politician merely to get elected.
And yes, Mr. Muscles was a lousy governor and a disappointment to all.
Does anyone remember Mr. M flying his private jet between his home in Los Angeles and Sacrament to go to work.
What are the bonafides to be an “environments crusader”?