THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Kindertown faces state closure; owner going to court


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

Kindertown parents found out Monday night at an emergency meeting the state intends to shutdown the South Lake Tahoe day care center Friday.

This is the second time in 16 months the state Department of Social Services has issued such a notice.

Mike McLaughlin, who successfully defended owner Maria Barrows-Crist in El Dorado County Superior Court last year, intends to file a stay on Thursday. If granted, it would mean the center with 90 youngsters and 18 employees would at least temporarily remain open.

Maria Barrows-Crist on Jan. 31 tells parents Kindertown's future is in jeopardy. Photo/Kathryn Reed

Maria Barrows-Crist on Jan. 31 tells parents Kindertown's future is in jeopardy. Photo/Kathryn Reed

Barrows-Crist, holding back tears at Kindertown, told the more than 40 adults and about a dozen children she is going to fight the current allegations just like she did the prior ones.

The most serious of the allegations in the 25-page document is a young boy with Downs syndrome wandering away from the facility to Highway 50, which parallels the facility a block away.

The report details how the boy was found by a family driving down the highway, how police were called, and the subsequent interview of Barrows-Crist and one of her employees.

In addition to a child being able to leave the premise unattended, the state says Barrows-Crist did not file the proper Unusual Incident Report.

“I thought he was hiding. We looked everywhere. I got in my car and searched the neighborhood,” Barrows-Crist said in an exclusive interview with Lake Tahoe News before the Jan. 31 meeting with parents. “I reported it. They said they didn’t get the Unusual Incident Report.”

Police officers are also obligated to report such incidents to the state, so it’s not like Barrows-Crist could hide what happened.

The paperwork ordering the license for the preschool and the license for the infant center be revoked was signed by Administrative Law Judge Ann Elizabeth Sarli on Jan. 3.

Barrows-Crist, unable to hire an attorney, represented herself at the late-November hearing that led to that decision. It was Jan. 26 that Frank S. Furtek, deputy director of the legal division for the Department of Social Services, signed the paperwork for the closure to be effective Feb. 5.

The state Department of Education will be at the center at 6:45 Tuesday morning telling parents where else they can enroll their children. Part of Barrows-Crist’s funding is from the state through subsidies parents receive.

“We’ve got your back” and “we’ll be here” were said by parents gathered on Monday. Many have been through this before.

John Cocores was at the Sept. 23, 2009, meeting Barrows-Crist conducted to let parents know about the first threat of closure. He was there Jan. 31, 2011, too.

Cocores took his 4-year-old son, Ryan, out of Kindertown for a bit during the uncertainty of whether is would remain open. The second day at the new place, which Cocores would not name, Ryan suffered a head injury.

“He is progressing wonderfully,” Cocores says of his son at Kindertown. He only has good things to say about the care his child receives.

Cocores goes on to say, “At some point you have to wonder when it’s harassment. Do they inspect all the schools as much as this do (Kindertown)?”

Kori Tomlin, senior staff attorney with the Department of Social Services, deferred comments to the public affairs section of DSS. A representative could not immediately be reached for comment.

Throughout the report Barrows-Crist’s credibility is called into question.

The report says, “Respondent’s attitude towards [sic] these two citations for lack of care and supervision demonstrated her lack of understanding of the seriousness of her violations. She maintained that the Department was unreasonable for citing her and was persecuting her because of her success in opposing earlier disciplinary action. She maintained that no child had been hurt in the almost 30 years she has been operating her facilities. Her position was that she had been set up for license revocation. She completely disregarded the fact that the Department is obligated to respond and investigate when a child is found running into and along side Highway 50, choosing instead to view the investigation and citation as persecution.”

In speaking with Lake Tahoe News, Barrows-Crist does believe she is being singled out. She also acknowledged the gravity of the charge, but says her site is not the first the child has run from, just the first to be closed because of it.

Barrows-Crist said the child’s father continues to bring the youngster to Kindertown.

Barrows-Crist said the worst that will happen if the state prevails in shuttering the facility that opened in July 1973 is she files for bankruptcy, the children must find other care facilities, and the employees new jobs.

For now, though, she is counting on a judge issuing the stay this week. Then she needs to raise $20,000 to keep McLaughlin on as her attorney. She’s already in arrears on paying Feldman, Shaw, McLaughlin LLP.

She has spent more than $100,000 in attorneys’ fees in the last 16 months. The Kindertown bus is for sale. If Barrows-Crist can get through this chapter of turmoil, she plans to sell the center. She has a meeting with a real estate agent Tuesday.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (8)
  1. dreamer says - Posted: January 31, 2011

    i believe that this is a case of harassment…both of my grown children attended kindertown..and its a wonderful place for kids…maria cares for each child like her own….this is terrible…and will ruin her personally, financially and mentally…someone in power should step up and help her and the people of slt…from this harassment…….

  2. MarbleGirl says - Posted: February 1, 2011

    This has to stop – I worked at Kindertown 25 years ago and have been there to visit EVERY time I am in Tahoe and NOTHING has changed. This is a tremendous facility with caring individuals and the harassment is unbelievable. We all need to stand up and help save this school! 6,000 of Tahoe’s kids have flowed through Kindertown – we all need to help Maria in this. Let’s stand up and help her financially if nothing else ~ she is swimming in debt. Please send anything you can to Mike Mclaughlin from Feldman, Shaw, and Mclaughlin at 182 u.s. highway 50 post office box 1249 zephyr cove, nv 89448 telephone (775) 588-5311 fax (775) 589-6447.

  3. John says - Posted: February 1, 2011

    .I would like to also say that as over protective parents(so people have told us)our primary concern is and always will be what is best for our child.Kindertown is the only facility that is trying to be closed due to what happened.Why did this legal action not take place at other facilities?Why is Maria going through this for taking on the task of a special needs child.Most places would not take the risk to begin with.All I ask is,do all the other child care and pre-school centers get looked at as close as Kindertown.As Ryan’s parents,we do and always have trusted Maria and her staff with our son.Closing Kindertown?Since when does someone else know whats best for our child.

  4. snoheather says - Posted: February 1, 2011

    This is a sad story in many ways. On one hand you have the displacement of all the children from a place that they are comfortable being at. It is hard to find quality child care in South Lake Tahoe and from the comments of the parents that take their children to Kindertown, they feel they’re being provided with quality child care. Who is to tell them any different?
    On the other hand you have a little boy who had the ability to leave the facility without being noticed and wander over to Highway 50. What if the boy had been hit by a car and injured or even killed? Then we would be hearing people asking how the state had allowed the facility to stay open after all the complaints against it. This was the most serious complaint out of a 25 page document. 25 pages? That is a substaintial number of complaints. There is no way a kid should be able to wander off from a child care facility. This is absolutely unacceptable no matter how you argue it.
    I find it hard to believe this is a frivolous matter and that the state is just trying to get back at the owner. There are way bigger facilities throughout the state and I can’t picture the state would spend all this time and money going after Kindertown without good reason.

  5. Dano says - Posted: February 2, 2011

    harassment pure and simple.

    do a little investigative journalism and discover how many times Kindertown has been checked by the department in the last year and how much others get checked?

    Its a witch hunt, and the ad. Law judges on the west slope are in cahoots.

    I loathe unchecked public agencies.

  6. John says - Posted: February 2, 2011

    I would like to set the record straight.In my interview I mentioned a head injury our child suffered at another facility.He is fine.It was not the injury that was the problem,kids get hurt.The series of events that followed the injury,was the problem.The facility changed how head injuries were handled.Problem solved.Accidents happen and people make mistakes.

  7. Michele says - Posted: February 3, 2011

    One of the things the state neglects to bring light to is the fact that the child in question had also escaped from all of the other day cares and schools that he has attended. Yet none of those schools face closure? I think that is a little odd.

  8. Janet B says - Posted: February 3, 2011

    I’m sorry, have I misread or are you saying that there was prior knowledge of this child having a habit of “escaping” and yet he was not under sufficent supervison. Did he make it into oncoming traffic while staff thought he was hiding? I firmly believe that the State has every right to revoke the licence of a center that has such a vast record of violations.