LTUSD cuts 10 jobs for 2011-12; more possible
By Kathryn Reed
A counselor and two teachers at South Tahoe Middle School, two teachers at South Tahoe High School, two custodians, a teacher at the Independent Learning Academy, the human resources director, the English learner coordinator. Those are all the positions slashed Tuesday night from the Lake Tahoe Unified School District’s payroll for 2011-12.
The cuts will save the district $840,000.
Lake Tahoe Unified, like all districts in California, is grappling with state take-aways that are making it difficult to continue providing the services parents, the community and educators want and expect.
The district’s approach has been to keep as many programs and people as possible. Class-size reduction is a luxury in most districts. LTUSD has stuck with the program, believing children learn better when the student to teacher ratio is reduced.
If LTUSD were to completely eliminate class-size reduction, it would mean 18 teachers without jobs.
“Our mission is to keep as many people as possible,” Jim Watson, HR director, told Lake Tahoe News after the Feb. 8 meeting. “Employment is not only good for the community, it’s good for the kids because it returns programs (to the schools) we believe make a difference.”
But on the chopping block that night was his job. He admits to having mixed emotions about retiring after spending 37 years in California’s education system.
As dreary as the news was, in many ways the emotional part is just beginning. Now it’s time for district officials to look at who has turned in their paperwork to retire, balance that information against the cuts the board made Tuesday and fill in names for the positions that were eliminated.
At the March 1 special board meeting the names of the people increasing South Lake Tahoe’s 17 percent unemployment rate are likely to be known. State law mandates certificated employees be notified by March 15 if they will be receiving a pink slip.
Between now and then the principals at the middle and high schools will be looking at master schedules to see what classes are cut along with the positions.
Before the board voted unanimously for the cuts, STMS counselor JoAnn Hernandez expressed what life for her and colleague Roy Benavidez is like.
She questioned how the school of 860 students would cope with one counselor. She wonders what happens to the 100 special education students. She spoke of the 150 students each trimester who receive extra counseling because they have received a D or an F.
Nevada resident Kathy Percival told the board the expense of paying for her son to attend South Tahoe High is worth it, but stressed the need to keep the focus on quality teachers and programs. She told the board shortening the school year should not be an option.
But it is.
However, because it is something that must be negotiated with the unions, the board cannot automatically vote on it. The same goes for implementing furlough days. State law allows the district to go from 180 to 175 days.
LTUSD can save $100,000 for each day classes are not in session and teachers are not on campus.
Two things were stressed Tuesday night. One, is the 2012-13 cuts will be more painful if voters do not approve extending the taxes that will likely be on the June ballot. LTUSD faces another 10.5 positions being cut in a worst-case scenario.
The other fact that kept being reiterated is how districts cannot spend money however they want. Although the state in recent years has offered more flexibility with categorical funds, plenty of strings remain.
The district cannot take money from the voter approved Measure G or any of the matching state grant dollars to use them for items other than building facilities. Likewise, developers’ fees have criteria for how they are spent. That is why the high school can get lights and a refurbished football field for next season – the district’s share is from developers’ fees.
CFO Deb Yates said in her 28 years in the profession she has never seen the financial picture so bleak.
“I’ve absolutely never seen anything close to the level of reductions we are looking at and that we’ve sustained,” Yates said.
The problems for school districts stem from the state reducing what it pays per student as well other cutbacks. The state is giving LTUSD almost 20 percent less than what it is owed. This equates to $4.625 million for the 2011-12 school year, $4.2 million this school year, and nearly $4.5 million for 2009-10.
“Think what we could do with that kind of money,” Yates said.
Instead of cutting jobs of the people who need them, maybe look into making it a little easier for people to retire. The golden hand shake is coming up I woulod like to take advantage of this opportunity, but I can’t because you have to be with the district fifteen years to qualify. If this was change to say 10 years maybe more people would consider retiring.
Ok make sure my math is correct:
10 people = $840,000
which means
each person would have made on average $84,000 a year???
I always hear that our teachers are underpaid. So something isn’t adding up here. Is this supposed to be the savings represented over 3 years or does this include some massive amount of benefits?
Louis, you forgot to add in the Social Security payments, health insurance, disability and other costs the district pays for these people/employees. It is not as it seems when you include all of these additional employer costs.
Could I climb to the highest place in Athens, I would lift my voice and proclaim, “Fellow citizens, why do you turn and scrape every stone to gather wealth and take so little care of your children to whom one day you must relinquish it all?”
Socrates, it’s because people like “would love to retire” keep wanting to suck the children’s money out of the system to enrich their own lives. And the system keeps letting them.
Yes, it would be awesome to retire after 10 yrs! And have you noticed how they talk about eliminating positions, but how they’re just shifting the burden to the pension system? The taxpayer is thus still on the hook for the compensation!
Schools need good teachers, counselors and custodians but do they really need a full offering of sports programs? What are the real costs of each?
People who do not value education, are usually not well educated.
This is not about placing a value on education. It’s about how the funds that are supposed to be for education are actually being spent on everything BUT!
The middle class is dying!
No longer can they take care the bills we are accustomed to.
There’s nothing wrong with a one room class school house.
All are past families did it…why should we be so privileged?
The greatest educators taught regardless the risk,or times,or conditions.
My only concern is the tech world needing electricty to perform what we as people use to do on paper with pencils.
I’ve yet to see a kid do math or read a normal clock without a computer.
That really concerns me.
We must protect our paper books to the end of time.
“Paper really does have a advantage over plastic tablets.The only energy it needs is a mind wanting to LEARN”.
JUST DO IT!
Very nice, htmalit!
Cutting the jobs of those on the “front lines”, including teachers and above all, the two great middle school counselors, Mr. Benevediz and Ms. Hernandez, will only increase my job security at the juvenile treatment center next door. Reducing the school year to 175 days is a very bad idea; there is something drastically wrong with a society/system which has so little regard for its children and does not care about educating them. With 20% unemployment in this town, we need to start thinking about what is important in our community; education for our children is the first line of defense in keeping them out of the jails.