THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Park advocates question wisdom of closing Mono Lake


image_pdfimage_print

By Lance Williams, California Watch

Mono Lake is the second-largest lake in California – a gorgeous, otherworldly expanse of aquamarine saltwater in the high desert east of Yosemite National Park.

Mono Lake is one of 70 California parks threatened to be closed. Photo/Michael Maloney

Mono Lake is one of 70 California parks threatened to be closed. Photo/Michael Maloney

Its very existence is a modern environmental success story. As late as 1984, the lake was condemned to become a 65-square-mile salt flat, as the city of Los Angeles had dammed its tributary streams and diverted the water into the LA aqueduct.

It was saved, in dramatic fashion, by an unlikely coalition of trout fishermen, environmentalists and water-rights lawyers. Today, it’s recovering from 50 years of abuse.

But now, as part of a round of budget cuts, Gov. Jerry Brown has ordered the closure of the Mono Lake Tufa State Natural Reserve, the state park established as part of the effort to save the lake.

It’s one of 70 state parks being shuttered in hopes of saving $22 million.

Mono Lake’s boosters say closing the park won‘t save the state a dime. But they say it will derail volunteer programs that have allowed the park to operate for years at minimal cost to the state.

“It doesn’t make any sense,” said Geoff McQuilkin, executive director of the Mono Lake Committee, the organization founded in the 1970s to save Mono Lake.

Read the whole story

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (2)
  1. tahoeadvocate says - Posted: June 25, 2011

    Stop diverting water to LA and the lake should recover

  2. dumbfounded says - Posted: June 26, 2011

    Maybe the State should stop spending any money whatsoever on the citizens that pay the taxes. That way only the bloated bureaucracy would be the only thing that the State would have to spend money on. State workers would all get raises and everyone would be happy. Except the taxpayers, of course. But, as many legislators have demonstrated, who cares about taxpayers?