THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

What to look for at next week’s S. Tahoe council meeting


image_pdfimage_print

Some of the more interesting items on the Oct. 4 South Lake Tahoe City Council agenda are either on the consent agenda or closed session.

Analysis

The consent agenda is usually for slam-dunk items that require no discussion. However, that has not been the case with these five. They seem to pull about half the items each meeting – signaling either a disconnect between staff and council to what is important, or how well versed the council is on the item.

Next week’s red flag consent agenda is the resolution approving salaries and benefits of non-represented management and non-represented confidential employees.

While there is nothing alarming in the staff report, in these contentious budget times that necessitated an interim budget be passed before the complete 2011-12 budget is voted on later this month, this shows a lack of transparency on the city’s part by putting it on the consent agenda.

On the closed session agenda is the city manager’s annual performance review. While this is the usual place for such a review, it does come later than normal. Usually is at the one-year mark, which would have been August. However, previous councils have moved that date around. Lake Tahoe News has been told the format of the review has been changed, which caused some of the delay. No longer is it council members writing down what they like or don’t like about the person. Some structure and professionalism has reportedly been introduced to the process.

What the council exactly thinks about City Manager Tony O’Rourke will not be public information. This is the same for any employee. However, a raise, additional perks or extension of his three-year contract would be public information.

In the past, city managers who want to continue on and who the council wants to stay put have been offered an additional year to their contract. That will be the item to look for and the reasons behind the decision (if anyone will talk) if that additional year is not forthcoming.

Tuesday’s meeting starts at 9am at Lake Tahoe Airport. Here is the City Council agenda.

— Lake Tahoe News staff report

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (13)
  1. PubWorksTV says - Posted: October 1, 2011

    I just gave my house back to the bank and moved from the south shore to Incline Village.

    The thing that happened in my neighborhood is the distressed sales were to Gov Union employees from various areas flush with cash bonus money from the Obama stash of tax payor cash. Aka stimulus money.

    SLT is like the union city Detroit in the sky.

    The thing is how will the region fair over time with so much of the population being CA gov union types of thinkers?

    Ahhhh America, we miss you so.

    The town is being

  2. Alex Campbell says - Posted: October 1, 2011

    Non-represented confidential employees salries to be approved.
    Hold it! thinking of good old boy Folsom police chief Hal Barker.The Chief was appointed Grand Jury Foreman as a cover for the BOS. Later, his reward was the Sheriffs job.
    In the local Masonic newsletter announcing Hal was to be installed as Most Worshipful Master,he proudly stated that Dan Lundgren would be in attendance.
    Scotch-Irish catholic Dan? Long story short wife Bobbie lundgren a Folsom confidential employee replaced Dan. When asked what does a confidential employee do? the answer was “It’s Confidential”

  3. Billie Jo McAfee says - Posted: October 1, 2011

    If we are paying the bills, why can’t we know?

  4. Tahoan25 says - Posted: October 1, 2011

    Upper Management salaries must take a big part of the cuts going on. To continually say that THEY are doing more thus need to be compensated is a slap in the face to the service employees who ALSO have been doing more with less time and money. AND to be thinking of laying off service workers and then create more management is pure evil.

    Build community, support local jobs & businesses, create a positive buzz for our schools — we need regular people of all income levels moving into OUR town to enjoy Tahoe’s bounty, live, work and attend our schools, not just tourist dollars.

  5. Eco Tahoe says - Posted: October 1, 2011

    The post on the article about pensions claims that the county is $370 million short on the retirement funds???

    Is that true?

    How about the City of South lake tahoe, are they short on the retirement accounts too?

    Are city residents responsible to help pay for the county shortfall?

    Sounds like deep dodo.

  6. Joe Stirumup says - Posted: October 1, 2011

    Pub says that it is mostly government union employees buying houses in Pubs old neighborhood. I heard that from someone else recently too. Is there any way to find out if that is true?

    Any realty people out there to check that before we have people calling SLT a union town. That would be a bad reputation to get if it weren’t true.

  7. Parker says - Posted: October 1, 2011

    What the Council thinks of the CM absolutely needs to be public info!!! How cowardly of all the 5 Council Members if they do not let the public know!!!

    If the CM proposes things, and any of them states, “Well I wasn’t really for it, but…” Shame on them!

    Stand up and be heard and let the taxpayer/voters know where you stand!

  8. geeper says - Posted: October 3, 2011

    So what’s up with Tony O’Roarke on the agenda? Price and terms of payment for 803 stateline ave. South Lake Tahoe. Is the city buying or leasing this property?

  9. thirtytwoz says - Posted: October 3, 2011

    geeper good looking out! Why is the city looking to buy/lease lake front property when there is a budget shortfall? my thoughts are they might have been trying to push this through after the orignal budget date of september 27 . Hoping there would be a sudden surplus in the budget Tony?

  10. thirtytwoz says - Posted: October 3, 2011

    oh yeah the address is 803 stateline ave.
    and the asking price is 1.4 million dollars!

  11. geeper says - Posted: October 4, 2011

    $4.1 Million! Nice place if you can afford it.

  12. geeper says - Posted: October 4, 2011

    I would still like to know what the city manager is going to do with it, perhaps a city park?