THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Highway 50 may be routed through neighborhoods


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

STATELINE – Turning Highway 50 near and through the casino corridor into a city street and the roads from Pioneer Trail behind Raley’s at the state line into a state highway may one day be a reality.

Known locally as the Loop Road project, officials are now trying to get people to call it the Highway 50 South Shore Community Revitalization Project.

Highway 50 going east beyond Pioneer Trail near the state line could become a city street. Photo/LTN

Highway 50 going east beyond Pioneer Trail near the state line could become a city street. Photo/LTN

There was a time when the highway was to be rerouted behind all of the main Stateline casinos. Now the project only involves the mountainside of the loop road – what goes behind Harrah’s and MontBleu.

The thinking is it would not be wise to keep the state highway between the lake and casinos; that’s why it is not taking a western loop.

Also originally talked about was starting the realignment at Heavenly Village Way/Park Avenue. That has been scrapped to now start at the intersection of Highway 50 and Pioneer Trail. The alignment would somewhat follow the shortcut locals take to avoid driving through the casino corridor.

This would mean turning what are now city streets into a five-lane highway – two lanes in each direction, with a middle turn lane. The casino area would be three lanes – one in each direction with a middle turn lane.

Where Lake Parkway hooks up with Highway 50 near MontBleu could become a roundabout.

Reasons for the change

Highlights of the project were touched on by Carl Hasty, executive director for Tahoe Transportation District – lead agency on the project, at the Nov. 4 joint South Lake Tahoe City Council-Douglas County Commission meeting at Edgewood Tahoe.

Hasty told that group one advantage to the preferred alternative is the street in front of the casinos could more easily be closed off for special events. This would avoid nightmares like a few years ago when Highway 50 was shutdown for Opening Days Lake Tahoe.

Michael Olson, chairman of the county commission, said he likes the idea. “It would create a Tahoe experience.”

Hasty said studies show two-thirds of the highway traffic has a destination other than the casinos or Heavenly Village, so rerouting them would not take them away from their end point.

People would still be able to access the casinos as they do now – on either side of the structures.

While three alternatives are proposed (one is to do nothing), the above scenario is what transportation officials’ support.

Meetings begin this week to gather input from the public. Written comments will be taken until Dec. 16. The scoping document provides more details.

All of this ties into the South Shore Vision Plan – making the area from Ski Run Boulevard to Kahle Drive more user friendly. But the Loop Road project has been talked about for decades, while the former is a new concept.

Eliminating people’s homes

To do what proponents want would mean displacing a number of people, along with businesses at the corner of the highway and Pioneer Trail. It’s a residential community on the back roads that would become a state highway.

Hasty said when the time comes property owners would be offered fair market value.

When asked about how South Lake Tahoe’s eminent domain policy plays into their thinking, he told Lake Tahoe News, “It could stop the project.”

He also added, “Do you pay more than market value or do you not do the project?”

The City Council in 2007 passed a resolution, with an addendum added in March 2008, that essentially bans eminent domain from being used in the city limits. While there was talk of requiring the issue be taken to the voters for the policy to be overturned, that never got written into the resolution. But the council could still make it be a contingency factor for the project to go forward.

Mayor Hal Cole told Lake Tahoe News when Hasty made a presentation a year ago to the council, the eminent domain issue came up.

“They know how the city feels,” Cole said of project proponents.

The city resolution specifically talks about not using eminent domain to displace low- and moderate-income residents living in any type of dwelling.

Property owners have been mailed information about the project. Tenants are expected to receive a flyer this week. But that is just days from the Nov. 10 TTD board meeting – not giving people much time to rearrange their schedule if they were wanting to attend.

Relocation law demands people displaced via eminent domain be relocated. Hasty said that is the plan. Specifics have not been detailed, but Hasty said housing would be found for people in the general area. After all, many of those people have limited incomes and walk to work.

Hasty also said the project is still a long way from being a reality.

It’s estimated to cost close to $70 million. That price tag includes acquisition and relocation expenses. TTD would like to apply for federal grants in a year if the project is shovel ready by then. That would mean having the environmental documents completed.

Besides getting the city to agree to the project, Douglas County will have to say yes. So will Caltrans and the Nevada Department of Transportation.

Hasty said the two state transportation agencies have been approached and have participated in discussions. But this is a local project, not something either state is spearheading.

Dates to know:

• Nov. 10 at 1pm, Tahoe Transportation District board meeting at the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency board room, 128 Market St., Stateline.

• Dec. 7 at 9:30am, TRPA Advisory Planning Commission meeting at the TRPA board room, 128 Market St., Stateline.

• Dec. 16 is the last day to submit comments on the scoping document.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (14)
  1. dogwoman says - Posted: November 7, 2011

    The government abused its ability to use eminent domain and now it may come back to bite them in the butt.

  2. Steve says - Posted: November 7, 2011

    If the casinos want to close off the area in front of them for special events, let them pay to relocate Highway 50.

    Highway 50 works perfectly fine now, it is inappropriate to ask taxpayers to fund its unnecessary relocation and to use eminent domain to unnecessarily displace residents and property owners in adjacent residential areas.

  3. Citizen Kane says - Posted: November 7, 2011

    Well the best time to announce a complicated and controversial project is obvioulsy December, when most people are involved in the chaos of the holidays. This announcement, at this time of year and the time frames suggested in the article, is more than enough to make someone extremely suspicious of the level of honest interest (rather than meeting a legal minimum requirement) in collecting public comment from ordinary citizens. It is also clear that “fair market value” is at a low – so it does seem such a project will cause a lot of folks to loose their place of residence while minimizing the cost of moving them out. Water quality aside, I wonder how this would fly if such a thing was proposed through the Keys or Montgomery Estates?
    And hey, we have a big whole in the ground in the shape of a square at stateline, why not see if we can geneate a big swath of a cut that loops around Crescent V and the casinos?
    I think the big question to ask here is who really benefits from this? – the environment and the city as a whole, or just certain well connected corporations?

  4. tahoeadvocate says - Posted: November 7, 2011

    The Mountainside Loop sounds one option from the TRPA Highway 50 study some years back. It’s a good concept which moves traffic away from the Lake. A map should be presented showing which properties are affected. The bigger question is who pays for it.

  5. Steven says - Posted: November 7, 2011

    Re-routing hwy 50 is a great idea. But the new 50 should be one huge round-a-bout. One way, counter clockwise, from the proposed start at pioneer trail, behind Raleys and the casinos, continuing between horizon and the golf course and back to the park ave/ 50 intersection. Permanently close the existing hwy 50 corridor and make it a pedestrian walkway/park area clear past the casinos to lake parkway intersection. No new permanent buildings. Events could be held without having to close any streets. Access to all businesses would be from the round-a-bout. Not making the existing corridor pedestrian only is a hugh mistake and should cancel the project. Make the whole area a real village. This might even bring up new ideas to develope “the hole” .

  6. Careaboutthecommunity says - Posted: November 7, 2011

    I don’t see how you could reasonably get from Lake Pkwy to Pioneer Trail without totally plowing through a densely populated neighborhood, and to not make the curve to sharp, you should go right through the Raley’s shopping center.

    “It’s estimated to cost close to $70 million.”

    How about building a tunnel underneath Hwy 50 through the casino corridor? The upper part would become a park-like pedestrian area, that would keep people safe from cars when walking to and from the different casinos, and could also be used to hold special events, and be seasonally decorated.

  7. tahoeadvocate says - Posted: November 7, 2011

    The tunnel idea is a good one but what do you think the costs would be? If I remember correctly the walkway tunnel between Harveys and Harrahs cost $3M, 30 years ago. Can you imagine what it would cost to build a tunnel from Mont Blue to Pioneer Trail?

  8. Paul says - Posted: November 7, 2011

    I just reviewed the mailing and this project would be a dream for the casino corridor and South Lake Tahoe. Tourism drives our economy and the current experience for tourists is average at best. This would be a huge step in the right direction. Thank you to everyone behind this project.

  9. sunriser2 says - Posted: November 7, 2011

    Big plans for a group of peopel who can’t fill pot holes or fix stop lights.

    Another example of our leaders are still begging for grants and matching funds.

    The country, states, counties and city are broke, time to live within our means.

  10. Steven says - Posted: November 7, 2011

    The pupose of moving hwy 50 is to keep traffic flowing. A couple problems with the mountain side 5 lane hwy: How will pedestrians and vehicles get in and out of Van Sycle park? A signal? Traffic just came to a halt! Also, recently a housing project was proposed for the mountain side of the “new” hwy 50. How will these people get in and out of the developement across 5 lanes of traffic? Another signal? Traffic just stopped again. There are also skiers and snowboards coming down the hill heading towards the gondola. How do they get across 5 lanes of traffic? If traffic does not flow smoothly, why bother moving hwy 50?

    The best thing about building a tunnel–use the dirt to fill in “the hole” !

  11. Citizen Kane says - Posted: November 8, 2011

    If building the walkway under Hwy 50 is $3 million, rerouting Hwy 50 is not a $70 million dollar project. However the tunnel idea is certainly the least socially disrupting. One commenter has a really good point that shifting the traffic issue to another location makes the need for this project w/o benefit to the community (although it would help the casino properties). Unfortunately, road construction rarely aleviates traffic – it just attracts it.

  12. JohnnyGP says - Posted: November 9, 2011

    Close off the Caisno Corridor, expand out a bit for more LOCAL shops (Add a non-local owner tax to keep out chains, etc)to line the corridor. Run a complete circle/beltway around the corridor. This would hide the dated face of the casinos, improve the view of the blighted streets around the corridor, and as Steven suggested, any dirt we dig up, FILL THAT HOLE.

  13. Ron Williams says - Posted: November 12, 2011

    Doesn’t the city have enough projects going right now? There is a big hole up by state line that we all paid for somehow. It’s not going to help the community out any by rerouting traffic around the casinos.So they go in tear out alot of trees maybe houses and then don’t get any funding half way through the job.It might match the great hole hole of state line.

  14. info says - Posted: November 12, 2011

    The hole isn’t the city’s project. And we didn’t pay for it.