THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

LTUSD, LTCC brace for their share of $1 bil. in midyear cuts


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

Money for teachers, textbooks and lights for the classrooms remain – for the most part – but there may be no students sitting at the desks. That’s because school bus funding has been cut throughout California.

Gov. Jerry Brown on Tuesday pulled the trigger to slice millions of dollars from K-14 education.

When the state budget was passed last summer a number of assumptions came with it – like how much revenue would flow to Sacramento. Those predictions are so far off — $4 billion short – they forced the governor to implement midyear cuts.

State budget cuts could force LTUSD buses to sit idle in the garage. Photo/LTN file

For Lake Tahoe Unified School District it means losing $382,000 in transportation dollars.

“Our fear is what do the cuts look like next year,” Superintendent Jim Tarwater told Lake Tahoe News after the Dec. 13 school board meeting adjourned at 10:30pm. “We have to bus people.”

The state isn’t saying if these are one-time cuts or ongoing for 2012-13.

And that bus money is  just what is used to get students to and from school. Athletic and special education busing expenses are separate categories.

Students can’t drive their friends to school until they’ve had a driver’s license for at least a year. The price of a gallon of gasoline is also filling up bus seats instead of the student parking lot. LTUSD buses 1,800 students, while about another 2,000 get to school some other way.

CFO Deb Yates was slated to give her first interim budget report to the board Tuesday night before it was known Brown would be dropping the hammer on education.

Throughout the state K-12 is about to lose $79.6 million in general funding, plus another $248 million in transportation. Community colleges will lose $102 million.

“It could have been worse,” Yates said.

Education officials knew when the state budget was passed that midyear cuts could occur. K-12 could have been hit with a $1.5 billion loss.

In addition to the bus dollars being whacked, the governor is taking about $14 per pupil, or roughly $56,000 from LTUSD.

To bridge the gap, reserves will be used. This was anticipated when the board approved its budget. But it will bring the reserves below the desired 3 percent minimum.

If the cuts are ongoing, this will drastically affect future budgets. As it stands, LTUSD is forecasting a shortfall of more than $416,000 for 2012-13.

But there is enough in reserves to survive the next two years with the known cuts.

Earlier Tuesday night the Lake Tahoe Community College board met.

LTCC President Kindred Murillo anticipates the college will face a $50,000 loss for this academic year. More than four times that amount was set aside for anticipated midyear cuts.

The big change will be the increase statewide of semester units going from $36 to $46 (which would be adjusted for LTCC’s quarter system). This fall semester fees went from $26 to $36.

All told, the governor came up with $1 billion in cuts. But that barely touches the projected 2012-13 deficit of $13 billion.

Other entities taking a hit include:

• $100 million each to the UC and CSU systems. (They each were cut by $650 million in the state’s current budget.)

• $100 million to In-Home Supportive Services.

• $15.9 million to county libraries.

• $100 million to services for people with developmental disabilities.

• $102 million to public safety services, including prisons.

• $8.6 million to Medi-Cal.

Most of the reductions announced Tuesday will be implemented Jan. 1, with more cuts likely to be declared by Brown after the first of the year.

One way to generate revenue is raising $6.8 billion through increasing the sales tax and raising rates on wealthier Californians. The governor wants voters to approve those taxes next November.

———–

In other action:

• Molly Blann is president of the LTCC board and Karen Borges the clerk.

• At LTUSD, Wendy David will serve as president of the board another year, with Sue Novasel the clerk.

 

 

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (15)
  1. Bob says - Posted: December 14, 2011

    Just wait till the City finds out their revenue from property taxes is not what they planned. SLT will unfortunately be having mid year cuts again in 2012 I predict as well.

  2. Robert Stiles says - Posted: December 14, 2011

    Congratulations, Molly.

  3. Mark Smith says - Posted: December 14, 2011

    I’ve long wondered how it is that schools got into the transportation and food business when they often don’t even teach. I’m all for back to basics – schools are about eduction, everything else is a luxury. I’m not saying we shouldn’t fund buses at least for the poor, but when short of money it is far better to cut outside the classroom. In my experience, though, school boards are quick to cut teachers and classroom aids and slow to cut non-educational costs. And busing has gotten a little ridiculous – in Incline Village, where I live full time, the first bus stop is a mere 3 blocks from the school. Seriously?

  4. sunriser2 says - Posted: December 14, 2011

    Bob ++!

    I bet no one on any of the school boards could come close to calculating a supplemental tax bill or credit.

    Let me help them. Homes are assessed as of January 1st for the tax year which runs from 6/30/2011-07/01/2012. So we start out six months in the whole as to market value.
    Now take one of the hundreds of homes that are selling for 50% of peak pricing. Subtract the current sales price from the existing assessed value. At this point you need to remove the fixed charges from the tax rate and multiply by the number of days in the tax year using the adjusted assessment.

    So now we have a large tax credit being refunded to the the past and possibly current owners of the property and the property has lost close to 50% of its’ value for the upcoming tax years.

    BUT IT’S OK HUNDREDS IF NOT THOUSANDS OF FAMILIES WILL MOVE TO TAHOE TO ENJOY OUR NEW HIGH SCHOOL!!!

  5. SLT Local says - Posted: December 14, 2011

    This is complete B.S. California SUCKS!!!

  6. tahoeadvocate says - Posted: December 14, 2011

    When will we start to fire the inept people who continue to forecast tax revenues inaccurately. It doesn’t just happen once or twice but every year.

  7. sunriser2 says - Posted: December 14, 2011

    Tahoeadvocate

    Because when they do the system as we know it will fall apart.
    We can’t handle the truth.

    Get an assessor’s map or two for your neighborhood. Walk around and write the addresses down on the map.

    Then go to the assessor’s website and look at the assessment history.

    The site only takes assessor’s numbers that’s why you need to put the addresses on the map.

    Then walk back the next day and compare the info.

  8. fireman says - Posted: December 14, 2011

    I think that cutting the education in any way is crazy. If you actually look at what the state is spending money on and could cut other than our childrens future. Why dont we start cutting some of our grand social services. If you want to see some crazy numbers look how much is spent on Mental Health. I am all for helping everyone out but when the as comes we need to prioritize what we can do today to help not be in this situation agian. How about educating our children so when they become leaders they dont continue to repeat history. I suggest we all call, write, e mail our representatives. Also look at the state budget overview and see what you think could be cut over our childrens future. Mess with my kids and it will be the final straw to leave, then there will be even less in the pot to pull from and i am sure there are others who feel the same way.

  9. I' m a prisoner caught in a cross fire says - Posted: December 17, 2011

    I FIND IT KINDA INSTERESTING THAT PEOPLE FROM OTHER COUNTRIES COME HERE AND THEIR CHRILDREN BECOME A-PLUS STUDENTS, GETS PAID SCHOLARSHIPS AND THE LONGTIME AMERICAN KIDS FLUNK.
    I really think the Americans have taken too much for granted and we waste so much blame the system.

  10. the conservation robot says - Posted: December 17, 2011

    ^^^
    Oh the irony… sweet sweet irony.

  11. TahoeTaxPayer says - Posted: January 12, 2012

    Why doesn’t LTCC slash nonperforming expenses and become a satellite campus of Sierra College or Sacramento City College? They could cut their costs by at least 1/4 without canceling a single class. It is time to think in creative, crisis mode people!

  12. PubworksTV says - Posted: January 13, 2012

    Do you remember when….??

    California – A walk through memory lane – the last 40 years.

    Back before the radical liberalism of the state fully metastasized and there were still conservative elements California’s wealth was able to provide free community college to the citizens.

    Remember that?

    Where did all that wealth go? What happened? Who moved the Cheese?

    California liberals killed the goose that laid the golden eggs, free enterprise.

    You can’t say you weren’t warned!

    More warnings…

    From here, it gets worse…

    Good job ‘head in the sand’ intellectually lazy Libs…

    Ignorance is bliss but when the bliss wears off, you’re still ignorant, a primary component of ‘run of the mill’ liberals… a byproduct of the socialist education monopoly.

    Decades of warnings, but thanks to the head in the sand arrogant, spoiled generations of Californians… (many Americans in general)

    it’s over!

    DEAL WITH IT

  13. santorum says - Posted: January 13, 2012

    I SO agree with you.. of course. We are So alike we could be twins! I don’t care one little teensy bit that it was my lookalike hero Ronnie Reagan that killed free higher education and cut many successful school programs. Just another part of his Glorious legacy.

  14. dogwoman says - Posted: January 13, 2012

    Hey, PubWorks! You must be famous! You have your very own STALKER! Be careful, though. Stalkers usually have way too much time on their hands and can escalate pretty easily when frustrated.

  15. PubworksTV says - Posted: January 13, 2012

    Dogwoman, yes I see I have a follower, usually however it is the smarter people that follow me.

    This one seems to be the exception to prove the rule.

    But seriously folks, my follower exemplifies the immaturity and silliness of so many of the sheeples of today. This is important stuff that is effecting every ones futures.

    To the other readers here I you have a choice … You can follow a child’s thoughts and antics or you can research the important facts and history for yourself.

    Good luck,

    and

    GBA