THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

State Parks struggling to deal with money woes


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

BRENTWOOD – When Jerry Brown was governor the first time, 90 percent of the State Parks’ budget was from the general fund. As of July 1, Brown proposes the general fund will be responsible for 28 percent of that department’s budget.

“Now we have to fund our mission,” is how Ruth Coleman, director of the Department of Parks and Recreation, put it at a meeting last week. Parks will be cut by $22 million in fiscal year 2012-13 as the proposals are written today.

Parks Director Ruth Coleman addresses the commission Jan. 27. Photo/Kathryn Reed

She said while the mission of the department has not changed, how it is funded has. Still on the table is the closure of 70 of the 278 state parks beginning July1 – the start of the next fiscal year.

“We don’t know if the 70 closures are permanent,” Coleman told the California State Park and Recreation commissioners.

Coleman told the seven-member board she is creating a business plan for every park, which is more like a strategic plan, for how to manage the parks. This includes developing public-private partnerships, having staff develop a more entrepreneurial mindset, being flexible, and possibly combining state parks.

Workshops will be conducted at five locations on Feb. 22 to gather input from the public and possible partners about how they want the parks to function going forward. The nearest meeting location to Lake Tahoe will be in West Sacramento. Time and exact locations are on the department’s website.

Coleman said she is working on ways to allow parks to keep more of the money they generate. However, this could be subject to approval by higher ups.

Lake Tahoe comes under the High Sierra region, which has 11 units in it.

 

 

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (3)
  1. West Shore Local says - Posted: February 1, 2012

    It would be logical for the Parks to keep all of the funds that they generate from user fees. Currently, these fees (think day-use passes and camping fees)go directly into the State fund “pot”. In recent years we’ve seen how well this strategy works out for our Parks. Something needs to change here…

  2. Robert says - Posted: February 1, 2012

    State parks is having serious issues… Hopefully this helps put the kabosh on that ridiculous river realignment project…

  3. Hang Ups From Way Back says - Posted: February 3, 2012

    People like Big Cities better anymore, that’s why so many more people live there than out in the sticks.