THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Lake Valley may absorb South Lake Tahoe Fire Department


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

South Lake Tahoe residents may no longer have a fire department to call their own. That is because talks are under way for the city department to be run by Lake Valley Fire Protection District.

Lake Valley, which is overseen by a five-member board, voted this month to proceed with a consolidation feasibility study of the two fire departments. South Lake Tahoe City Council members are slated to vote March 20 to go forward with the same study.

Lake Tahoe News furnished a slew of questions to both entities. Both agencies said they would not answer those questions until the council votes Tuesday and/or until the study progresses.

“We are probably looking at least a four- to six-month process to study the pros and cons of this,” City Manager Tony O’Rourke said.

Financial issues

Lake Valley has three sources of revenue – property taxes, developer fees and Measure M. The latter is a June 1986 voter approved tax that charges property owners $10 or $20 per year depending on whether a structure is on the parcel.

If the merger goes through, it is unknown how the new LVFPD would be funded, or how the discrepancy of some members of the service district being taxed and others not being taxed would be rectified.

Property taxes are the department’s primary source of income.

City residents don’t have a separate fire tax or fee. The fire department’s annual budget is $5.7 million, according to the city’s website. This comes out of the general fund, which gets its dollars primarily from property, sales and hotel taxes.

Lake Valley Fire Chief Gareth Harris in a letter dated March 8 to the City Council proposes the city use property tax dollars to fund its share of fire services for its residents to the tune of $6.526 million.

What the additional $800,000 the city would pay for compared to what is in this year’s budget is unknown because Lake Valley and the city are not answering questions. Nor is it known what other services might be cut by the city to make up this difference.

The city, though, is saving money this fiscal year by having the police chief take on the roll of fire chief, too. The council also eliminated the three battalion chief positions and is contracting with Lake Valley for fire marshal services.

Harris in his letter says he came up with the figure by taking 16.7 percent of 1 percent of the 2011-12 assessed tax roll of city properties that total $3,903,077,660.

Harris’ budget outline in his letter says to cover the city’s fire expenses it would take $6,999,5000.

What isn’t known is if the city were to pay $6.526 million as Harris suggests, if county residents are then subsidizing city fire costs to the tune of nearly a half million dollars.

Some particulars

O’Rourke told Lake Tahoe News, “We are looking also at different spectrums from contracting to a JPA to a full consolidation. We are going to look at it from multiple angles.”

However, the letter from Harris, which is included in the city’s fire consolidation staff report, has some specific details about how his department would be taking over the city department. He goes so far as to detail how the city would need to pay one-time startup costs of $787,000 that would pay for new uniforms for city firefighters, stationery, station signage and vehicle insignias.

The bulk of that figure — $534,000 – would be to buy out city employees’ sick, comp and vacation time.

In that total figure is $5,000 for public relations; what that entails is a mystery as well.

It is also not known where that one-time fee would come from.

Equipment upgrades are part of what’s being talked about.

Harris’ letter states, “This proposal also includes the replacement of two of the city’s first out fire engines and the ladder truck. This will be accomplished by a financed lease/purchase of the apparatus. In addition, both Station 3 and Station 2 will be remodeled and updated to accommodate the new ladder truck and meet current fire station design codes and requirements.”

The board of directors, according to Harris’ letter, would remain intact, with “residents of South Lake Tahoe … eligible to run for a seat on the board of directors at the next fire district election just like any other resident in the unincorporated county area.”

According to a clearly not updated Lake Valley fire website, the board of directors and their terms are:

• Dave Huber, Dec. 1, 2006-Dec. 3, 2010

• Robert Bettencourt, Dec. 5, 2008-Dec. 7-2012

• Gregory Herback, Dec. 5-2008-Dec. 3, 2010

• Robert Rossi, June 10, 2010-Dec. 3, 2010

• Ryan Wagoner, Dec. 5-2008-Dec. 7, 2012.

A little history

Lake Valley fire has been in existence since 1947. Most people think of it as the area serving Meyers. It covers approximately 83 square miles.

South Lake Tahoe’s department was formed in 1965 when the city was incorporated.

“They actually wanted to be part of the city. They were in the city boundaries at the time,” Laurel Ames said of the firefighters.

Ames was one of six members on the city’s incorporation committee. (The others were Wink Ames, Tom and Betty Mitchell, and Vaughn and Mary Burlingham.)

“When we incorporated we were controlled by very strict state incorporation laws,” Ames told Lake Tahoe News.

The only real leeway was with the boundaries. With no money to pay a surveyor, known landmarks were used. But it took court action (Ames v. County of El Dorado) and precedent setting law to figure out how to count landowners.

Ames said the ruling came out in their favor which said whoever was legally allowed to sign for all the other members became in name the landowner of the lot for incorporation purposes.

Another person involved with the early years of South Lake Tahoe said a reason to incorporate was to “control our own destiny”. Incorporation was tried three times – though not all came to a vote – before it was approved.

Now the destiny may change without the voters having a say.

That’s another of those unanswered questions – if the voters of either jurisdiction would have a say in the fire department consolidations or if the two governing boards have ultimate authority.

 

 

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (21)
  1. earl zitts says - Posted: March 19, 2012

    Let’s makes this process as confusing and convaluted as possible so the littles empires can be preserved.
    The city sure does control its own destiny and what a job it’s doing with its own PD and FD and airport, not to mention the ice rink.
    It would be nice if everybody pulled in the same directon for the benefit of our community and not for their personal kingdoms and pocketbooks.
    After the successful(?) consolidation of fire services maybe the same can happen with police services. Lots of luck.

  2. Tahoeadvocate says - Posted: March 19, 2012

    Using appraised value to determine fire protection is WRONG. It should be based on square footage. At another home, outside SLT, I paid a private fire department for protection. It was based on square footage of my home. The government decided they wanted their own fire department, fired the private company and based my new fee on appraised value. My bill went from $350/year to $1000/year. Must be the efficiency of government which came into play.

  3. Ej says - Posted: March 19, 2012

    In 1965 the voters approved establishing the City of South Lake Tahoe, The main reason for making that change was to improve Police,Fire protection and to improve our community’s streets.
    Well here it is 2012 our streets are a mess and now they want to outsource our Fire protection back to the county.
    The city has just added another level of government that is ineffective and has failed to meet the desires of the residents that originally voted for it.

  4. Another X Local says - Posted: March 19, 2012

    Well, I’m surprised it took this long for the idea of consolidation to come up. For the last 44 years the City has been the poster child for how to totally mismanage everything it touches. The FD is a prime example, especially with the goings on of the last few years. As for the City contributing $7M for their “share”, why should they? If they want to SAVE money & get out of providing fire protection to do so, then let every City resident pay the parcel fee Lake Valley imposes for their service & stay out of it entirely. In fact, Lake Valley should insist on it to prevent the City from screwing them up too. Where I live we have fire protection from a fire protection district & the service is outstanding. There is no reason the City couldn’t get the same from LVFPD. The SLTFD has been a joke around the Basin for years.

  5. Steve says - Posted: March 19, 2012

    Well at least the bureaucrats are finally thinking outside the box.

    Hopefully, next to be turned over to the county would be the inefficient, costly city airport that the city unwisely bought from the county for $1 – along with the commitment to operate it at a cost of hundreds of thousands of dollars a year – a huge annual financial loss. Heckuva a deal.

  6. dogwoman says - Posted: March 19, 2012

    And maybe we can just dissolve the City entirely. What does it actually do for its citizens besides costing them extra money? The county can do that just fine on its own.

  7. Skier says - Posted: March 19, 2012

    This should be a no brainer decision for those involved. LVFPD delivers an excellent service, and they would do the same for those who live within the City limits. City Councel-get out of the way and sign on the dotted line.

  8. Parker says - Posted: March 19, 2012

    Amazing it’s taken this long to consider! Both Depts. often show up at the same calls anyway, so glad they’re finally looking at ways to be efficient with our tax dollars! Now if they’d just look at consolidating all other services as well!

  9. Ken Curtzwiler says - Posted: March 19, 2012

    The original “CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA, MUNICIPAL FACILITIES CORPORATION” formed early on to build the City facilities and filed on October 28, 1966 is no longer around. The original BOD were Linne E. Nelson, Roger L. Scott and Dennis D. Maas. No streets or facilities were named after them as far as I know. Out of the first 19 folks who ran for council the top five were elected averaged 1124 votes and the vote to incorporate was 2011 for and 63 against. Also the name of our fair city was decided at the same time. South Lake Tahoe got 1290 votes and Lake Tahoe got 1172. The boundries were determined by maps dating back to the 40’s and 50’s and one back to 1917,1927 and 1929 for Al Tahoe and Stateline areas which were called South Shore of Lake Tahoe back then. Amazing that the number of voters has not changed much since 1965.

  10. fromform says - Posted: March 19, 2012

    i wonder what sort of process would be necessary to dissolve the city of south lake tahoe.

  11. Blubird says - Posted: March 19, 2012

    Thanks for that info SkiBum. I wonder what the exclusive use of the city name “Lake Tahoe” , w/o the So., would be worth now? In the internet age in would be Huge, in the Bitter Creek Saloon days.. not so much. (-:

  12. fireman says - Posted: March 19, 2012

    So how would this affect the employees and the retirees. Would the current employees now be Lake Valley Employees? Would they all have to reapply?? Are they guaranteed a job? Is this a way to break all the union contracts. This is the logical solution for a quality professional service like Lake Valley always provides.

  13. James says - Posted: March 19, 2012

    A City of SLT police officer on the current LVFPD board of directors? Same officer whose mother is a former mayor of the city?

    Wow, the coincidences just keep getting more and more amazing!

  14. Really? says - Posted: March 19, 2012

    You might want to check your facts. Last I checked there were no SLTPD officers serving the LVFD board. Give LVFD a call and check for yourself. Not everything is a conspiracy

  15. Sandy says - Posted: March 20, 2012

    Really? — Check your facts. Ryan Wagoner is the SLT cop. His mother, Kathay Lovell, was on the city council. In addition to that, she was on the JPA board that oversaw the ambulance agreement between the city and Lake Valley. No one said was a conspiracy. But it is the truth.

  16. Parker says - Posted: March 20, 2012

    And do you remember the story the Mtn. News did, written by the publisher of this news site, on the hiring of Mr. Wagoner by the SLTPD when his Mom was still on the City Council? And when her and her husband’s best friend was still Police Chief! (I refer you again to the most recent issue of the Mtn. News.)

  17. Atomic says - Posted: March 20, 2012

    OK, read this again…. “the city would need to pay one-time startup costs of $787,000 that would pay for new uniforms for city firefighters, stationery, station signage and vehicle insignias.” …AND 2 new engines, a new ladder truck, remodeling a couple of stations to accommodate the new trucks…..GET REAL. 3/4 of a million dollars for uniforms and stationary!? I’m totally over this BS, no wonder we’re broke, this is ridiculous….take that money out of their benefits and their holidays and their blah blah blah and I have to sprinkler my new house and add tempered glass…where does it all end guys? Firefighters out of my pockets NOW.

  18. sunriser2 says - Posted: March 21, 2012

    Atomic+1!!

  19. admin says - Posted: March 21, 2012

    Ryan Wagoner is no longer on the Lake Valley board. He was replaced last year by John Rice. Term expires in December.

    Kathryn Reed, LTN publisher

  20. JoAnn says - Posted: March 22, 2012

    In a small town, if you raise more than one generation, stands to reason there will be times when more than one family member works in public service. If that is the only complaint, then I don’t see the “crime” in a family raised to serve.

  21. Parker says - Posted: March 23, 2012

    Conflicts of interest are certainly bound to happen in a small town. But there’s been a terrible failure in our community to both fully disclose, and recuse from, those conflicts!