THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Community college uses tiered tuition to balance budget


image_pdfimage_print

By Jennifer Medina, New York Times

SANTA MONICA — For years now, administrators at the community college here have been inundated with woeful tales from students unable to register for the courses they need. Classes they want for essential job training or to fulfill requirements to transfer to four-year universities fill up within hours. Hundreds of students resort to crying and begging to enroll in a class, lining up at the doors of instructors and academic counselors.

Now, though, Santa Monica College is about to try something novel. This summer it will offer some courses for a higher price, so that students who are eager to get into a particular class can do so if they pay more.

The plan may be the first of its kind in the country, college officials and other higher education experts say, and if the college succeeds in implementing it, many other community colleges are likely to follow. Since 2009, enrollment in California community colleges has fallen by 300,000 students, to 2.6 million, and many believe the difficulty of registering for classes is the most important deterrent.

For generations, community colleges have been seen as a social equalizer, providing a relatively inexpensive education for poor students, immigrants and others without the skills, grades or money to attend a four-year institution.

So the two-tiered tuition structure being proposed here is raising eyebrows, and fundamental questions, about the role and obligations of community colleges. Will the policy essentially block some of the people it is designed to benefit? Many students believe the new policy — if the state does not block its implementation, which it could yet do — will unfairly exclude the poorest students and create a kind of upper and lower class of students.

Read the whole story

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (2)
  1. Tahoan says - Posted: April 8, 2012

    This is so wrong on so many accounts, putting an even bigger price on education while continuing to give raises to personnel.

  2. biggerpicture says - Posted: April 8, 2012

    Maybe we should just resign ourselves to the fact that soon education will be doled out to only the highest of bidders, unless we can pull our collective heads out and realize that the only chance we have as a prosperous and virtuous nation in the future is to insure that we are populated with HEALTHY, EDUCATED children from every part of the socio-economic spectrum!