THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Opinion: Selling of groundwater proves policy needs rethinking


image_pdfimage_print

By John Bredehoeft and Newsha Ajami

Imagine a lake half as large as Lake Tahoe, containing 17 million to 34 million acre-feet of water. That is what lies under the Cadiz and Bristol valleys in the Eastern Mojave Desert in San Bernardino County. Cadiz Inc., a privately held company, owns 34,000 acres that overlie this vast groundwater basin. The company plans to extract 2.5 million acre-feet of the water, a public good, over the next 50 years and sell it back to the public at a profit.

This project raises several concerns, some of which are directly related to the project while others point to the need for a public debate and discussion about California’s groundwater laws.

Here are some facts about the project: Cadiz is proposing to extract on average 50,000 acre-feet of groundwater from the basin each year for 50 years. The intended rate of extraction of groundwater is significantly greater than the estimated natural recharge rate (the speed that groundwater is refilled naturally by rain and snow) of 5,000-32,000 acre-feet a year, which will lead to unsustainable mining of groundwater during the life of the project. The groundwater will go into a 43-mile-long pipeline to transport it to the Colorado River Aqueduct, where it will be distributed to several water utilities in Southern California.

John Bredehoeft, formerly with the U.S. Geological Survey, formed the Hydrodynamics Group, a Sausalito consulting firm. Newsha Ajami, a hydrologist specializing in sustainable water resource management, is a senior research associate at the Pacific Institute in Oakland.

Read the whole story

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (2)
  1. Garry Bowen says - Posted: April 20, 2012

    This just shows how the love of money overcomes global concerns – a family decides that they need the cash flow, and that the public is in need of what they “own” – supply & demand at it’s best. . .

    The work of Gretchen Daily of Stanford University, whose work in “ecosystem services” (a term she coined) attempts to place monetary value on fresh air, fresh water and other ecosystem elements that support all life (including ours) – the conclusion so far: we could not afford it if we were to pay for what it does for us. . .there’s not enough money to cover the overall benefits to us of our natural resources. . .

    Supply & demand revisited . . .as money does not exist in nature. So, what is it worth to have fresh anything (?). . .

  2. Hangs Ups From Way Back says - Posted: April 20, 2012

    Owens Valleys speaks for itself.

    More people live in the cities than out them.