THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Lakeview Commons — battle rages on over lease, name


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

Does the landowner or the lessee have the right to name a piece of property?

That is the fundamental question as to what the name of Lakeview Commons in South Lake Tahoe will permanently be called.

City officials believe the name is fine based on the decision earlier this month not to sit with county officials to discuss the name.

Ever since the county leased this land to South Lake Tahoe the two government bodies have been squabbling. Photo/Kathryn Reed

El Dorado County officials on Tuesday spent considerable time discussing the whole area, which includes both sides of Highway 50. The entire area is loosely called the 56-acre project because that is how large the area is.

Phase one of two for the waterfront area is what is called Lakeview Commons. But at issue is how it got the name, whether it was a working name and who gets to have final say regarding the name.

Supervisor Norma Santiago gave a history about the area, which goes back to the 1920s when longtime families gave the land to the county to be used in perpetuity as open space.

South Lake Tahoe leases the land from the county. Through the years a number of agreements, leases, and memorandums of understanding have been signed between the government bodies.

South Lake Tahoe Assistant City Manager Nancy Kerry spoke on behalf of the city and for the council at the May 8 supervisors’ meeting in Placerville.

“It’s a false controversy about the name that has been used well over three years,” Kerry said. She even pointed out how all the supervisors’ documents listed the discussion item as Lakeview Commons.

Santiago, to her board said, “I ask for support for county counsel to work with our facilities group to look at the lease for clarity of what is contained in the lease in regards to any aspects of what happens on this property.”

On the May 15 council agenda is an item to possibly appoint a subcommittee for review of the lease agreement at El Dorado Beach-Lakeview Commons.

Supervisor Jack Sweeney has records dating to 1968 that he cited, where the land is called South Lake Tahoe-El Dorado Recreation Area. That name was what was used on working documents as the 56-acre project got under way until it morphed into Lakeview Commons.

Supervisor Ron Briggs said, “I never once thought we approved Lakeview Commons.”

Keeping it named El Dorado Beach, as the area was known before the $6 million renovation of the site, is what the majority of the supervisors want.

Supervisors Sweeney and Santiago were appointed to the El Dorado Beach ad hoc committee to look into the lease and work with the city.

The board will have its annual Tahoe meeting June 25. At that time a report to the board about the lease would likely be made.

However, on June 20 is the dedication by the city of Lakeview Commons.

Supervisors said a plaque can always be replaced if the name on it should be changed. The city has ordered the plaque. It says Lakeview Commons at El Dorado Beach.

Kerry mentioned how every City Council member who ever had anything to do with the project has a right to their name on the plaque. Plus, state reps, including a slew from California Tahoe Conservancy – the agency that funde the renovation – will be on the plaque.

The supes want the people of El Dorado County to be on the plaque and not their names or any other electeds. There was a little discussion about the order of the words, at which time Sweeney made a homosexual slur which can be heard at the very end of the video from this agenda item.

 

 

 

 

 

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (11)
  1. Carl Ribaudo says - Posted: May 11, 2012

    How about no politicians name and we thank the taxpayers of California.

  2. Steve says - Posted: May 11, 2012

    Typical baloney from government bureaucrats with nothing more productive to keep themselves occupied.

    And to save more needless hours wasted, skip the plaque altogether. Why bring up names held in contempt by so many?

  3. Gus says - Posted: May 11, 2012

    What’s wrong with El Dorado Beach? It’s what everyone will call it anyway.

  4. John says - Posted: May 11, 2012

    Carl, I think its SNPLMA isnt it? So taxpayers of Nevada?

  5. Billie Jo McAfee says - Posted: May 12, 2012

    The “56 Acre Project” always reminded me of “Winnie the Pooh” for some reason, then the project did a name change and is called “Lakeview Commons”, which makes it sound like a gated community. I think it is just fine as ElDorado Beach. Maps won’t have to be changed and locals will have no trouble giving directions. Just be practical. As for the sign with all the names……I think it should just say “Enjoy”. Too many sheisty things happened with that project.

  6. tony colombo says - Posted: May 12, 2012

    if the “elected” politicians want their name on a plaque, sell them a paving stone with said name on it…P.S. put their name on a plaque on the plywood siding surrounding the “TA-HOLE”

  7. Carl Ribaudo says - Posted: May 12, 2012

    California money only funded the project.

  8. Fromform says - Posted: May 12, 2012

    How imminent is this eminent domain process?

  9. Jim says - Posted: May 12, 2012

    I can answer the “At issue is how it got the name” question.
    A few years ago, I was asked by a City Council member to come up with a name for what was then called the “56 Acre Project.” I developed numerous names and as expected with all committee-driven projects, there were all kinds of “suggestions” and a number of revisions before Lakeview Commons was finally chosen.

    As a side note, I was not compensated for my services and gladly donated them to help create a lasting name for such a special place.

  10. deb says - Posted: May 25, 2012

    How about the names of Steering Committee members and all the folks who put their tireless hours / heart into this project, including a few individuals who happen to be / to have been politicians as well…