THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Study: Most tobacco money California collects doesn’t go to prevent or stop smoking


image_pdfimage_print

By Jon Ortiz, Sacramento Bee

With California voters poised to vote next week on a tobacco tax hike, a new federal study concludes that the state has used relatively little of the billions of dollars in tobacco money it already takes in to prevent kids from smoking or to help smokers quit.

Between 1998 and 2010, just 6 percent of the money collected from a massive lawsuit settlement and from cigarette taxes went to tobacco interdiction and education programs, the national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported last week, far below federal spending guidelines for effectively curbing tobacco use.

The report has provided fuel for both sides of the pitched debate over a June 5 ballot measure that would more than double the state tax on a pack of cigarettes. The money would pay for tobacco-related disease research and anti-smoking programs and go to fight illicit tobacco sales.

Proponents such as American Cancer Society lobbyist Jim Knox say the CDC report underscores why voters should support Proposition 29 – to lock in money for anti-tobacco efforts, improve public health and ultimately save lives.

The measure would bolster proven anti-tobacco programs that are woefully underfunded but remain a “model throughout the nation and the world,” Knox said.

Beth Miller, a spokeswoman for the tobacco industry-backed No on Prop 29 campaign, said the CDC study just proves government can’t be trusted with more tobacco tax money. She compared the ballot measure to others that funded controversial state projects, such as high-speed rail and stem cell research.

Read the whole story

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (3)
  1. dumbfounded says - Posted: June 1, 2012

    Since the article claims that only 6% goes to interdiction and education, one might wonder where the other 94% goes. I read the whole story and got the information I wanted. The Bee’s comments section was full of the regular nonsense of people calling each other names… sad.

  2. Sunriser2 says - Posted: June 1, 2012

    Two years ago El Dorado County was trying to buy a new animal shelter with $3,000,000 of the tobacco money.

    The deal feel apart in Barnett Business Park (west of Cameron Park) not sure if they found another property or not.

  3. Lisa says - Posted: June 1, 2012

    If even not one dime went to research funding but an added tax stopped some kids from starting and others to quit, it would be a success. Smoking costs taxpayers and employers billions each year. Anything that lessens the number of smokers is good.