THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Brown vetoes replacement for redevelopment agencies


image_pdfimage_print

By Patrick McGreevy, Los Angeles Times

SACAMENTO– Having previously ordered the closure of hundreds of redevelopment programs throughout California, Gov. Jerry Brown on Saturday vetoed six bills that would have given local governments other economic development powers, saying it is too soon to consider alternatives.

The governor and Legislature had acted earlier this year to close redevelopment agencies and have them begin to unwind their finances to increase money available for the state general fund and eliminate its shortfall.

Among the bills rejected were measures by Assembly Speaker John Pérez, D-Los Angeles, and Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento. Pérez’s AB2144 would have allowed local communities to create “infrastructure and revitalization financing districts” if approved by 55 percent of voters.

Pérez wanted to expand their powers to more clearly allow them to use property tax money and bond revenue to buy land and build housing and to construct and renovate commercial and industrial buildings.

“Expanding the scope of infrastructure financing districts is premature,” Brown wrote in his veto message. “This measure would likely cause cities to focus their efforts on using new tools provided by the measure instead of winding down redevelopment. This would prevent the state from achieving the General Fund savings assumed in this year’s budget.”

The veto message was similar for Steinberg’s measure that would have allowed cities to set up “sustainable communities investment authorities” to help the development of neighborhoods near transit hubs with housing and factories that provide equipment for the clean energy industry. That bill is SB1156.

Brown liked the idea but wrote in his veto message: “I prefer to take a constructive look at implementing this type of program once the winding down of redevelopment is complete and General Fund savings achieved.”

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (7)
  1. Tahoeadvocate says - Posted: October 1, 2012

    In other words, after I’ve taken all the money and put it into the general fund so I can spend it how I want, I’ll think about it.

  2. Chief Slowroller says - Posted: October 1, 2012

    redevelopment is the reason our Town is in such bad shape

  3. lou pierini says - Posted: October 1, 2012

    Its the policy makers that approved the redevelopment projects.

  4. 30yrlocal says - Posted: October 1, 2012

    I’m going against the grain here…I think redevelopment has helped Lake Tahoe in many ways. Financially it wasn’t the best move perhaps, but what we’ve created for ourselves and our visitors is 1000% better than what we had. Can you imagine what we’d look like if nothing was ever changed?

    Would you rather see the run down motels on the stretch from Raley’s to Harrah’s that were once there before Heavenly Village came? The long lines on Pioneer and Ski Run going up the hill to ski.. people that are now using the gondolas? The corner of Ski Run and 50 as it looked before? You think business has been slow now, imagine what it would have been had we just had an even more rundown image?

  5. Ryan Payne says - Posted: October 2, 2012

    The shuttering of redevelopment agencies is the reason why the City of South Lake Tahoe is being forced to sell the SW corner lot at Ski Run and Hwy 50. This prime piece of real estate does not belong in private hands so they can put more retail and/or lodging which will only serve to cannibalize the revenues from other sources within the city.

    The SW parcel at Ski Run and Hwy 50 would be the perfect place for a multi-agency, interactive Visitor’s Center. Imagine an “Explore Tahoe” on steroids with reps from places like the Tallac Historical Society, Washoe Tribe, the League, TRPA, USFS, etc… Imagine a place where all these competing agencies could work together and interact daily to provide a unique, educational experience for locals and tourists alike!

    And while we’re at it: THE HOLE SHOULD BE AN OUTDOOR EVENT CENTER with retail at street level!!! There are over 5 convention center spaces within a 1/4 mile, but concerts are still being held in the parking lots of casinos on the other side of the stateline? Why is Snowglobe in the middle of town at the playing fields? Where should it be instead?
    -my $.02

  6. Steve says - Posted: October 2, 2012

    Bring back Paul Kennedy’s Steak House and the Union 76 gas station. Their absence is a loss for the town.

  7. Chief Slowroller says - Posted: October 2, 2012

    Ryan before you moved here the corner of Ski Run used to be Junita’s Palm reading

    that corner has been a Hole in the Ground for 23 years now

    there were folks who were promised to have retail space there when they were displaced in phase 1 of Redevelopment