THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Managing forests could boost water yields


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathleen Masterson, Capitol Public Radio

Here at the 4,000-acre Blodgett Forest Research Station in the Sierra Nevada foothills, researchers have ongoing projects testing different techniques like clear-cutting and selective harvesting and prescriptive burns.

And soon they might also look at what kinds of forest management produce more clean water.

Forest manager Rob York shows me a 12-acre plot where he’s selectively removed individual trees. The sunlight is filtering in. It’s a much more open space than the shady reserve of 100-year old trees we just came from.

“Water yield we would expect to increase, compared to the reserve, because we have reduced the amount of large trees that are constantly pumping water out of ground and releasing water into the atmosphere. And we’ve reduced the canopy cover, so that’s more through-fall of snow,” York said.

If more snow makes it through to the forest floor, it’s more likely to percolate into groundwater supply.

About a third of California’s water supply comes from mountain snowpack. If forestry managers can learn techniques that boost water yield from forests, even a small percentage increase could make a difference for the state.

The forest research could also offer lessons about how forests respond to climate change, that will likely bring stressors like drought and heat.

York says forests that haven’t been thinned may have a tough time in a drought.

“If climate change causes drought stress, then we’re more likely to see the impacts on those high density forests,” York said. “So density management I think is something that we can focus in on as having a high potential to be useful, with respect to making forests more resilient.”

York says another worry with climate change is whether it may allow invasive species or pests to thrive in the Sierra. He says so far the Sierra hasn’t had extreme problems that some other forests have experienced.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (4)
  1. dumbfounded says - Posted: October 6, 2012

    I wonder what the success rate of mankind’s interference with nature has been? Should we really messing around thinking that we can improve on Mother Nature? I don’t.

  2. thing fish says - Posted: October 6, 2012

    Yeah, especially with something as important as water…

  3. John says - Posted: October 6, 2012

    This is nothing new. If you suppress fire then the number of trees increase. Then those trees consume more water. Thin the forest to a more normal stocking and the end result is more water. This isnt even particularly interesting.

  4. Bebe says - Posted: October 15, 2012

    This is old news – the HQFLG came out with this study a couple of years ago showing that in the 1900’s we had 120 trees per acre and now we have over 1600 trees per acre. They also showed it could increase water yields up to 40% even if we thinned back to 500 trees per acre.

    Looks like the Enviro’s ban on logging created Global Warming, and the drought.