THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Scientists worry about long-term effects of changing levels of algae, oxygen in Lake Tahoe


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

INCLINE VILLAGE – In the last four years the amount of algae found in Lake Tahoe has dramatically increased.

Why?

Scientists are still trying to figure that out.

Cells that are 5, 6, 7 microns in size that were not detected a decade ago are here.

“For some reason they have exploded,” Geoff Schladow, director of the Tahoe Environmental Research Center on the Sierra Nevada College campus, said during the Dec. 13 State of the Lake report.

Asian clams in Lake Tahoe create algae blooms as seen in the top right of this photo. Photo/LTN

The data pertains to 2011. These reports began in 2007, though issues surrounding Lake Tahoe’s clarity have been studied since the 1800s.

Algae blooms are also related to the growing Asian clam population. While these creatures have not been found throughout the lake, pockets of them are on the southern end. The algae they produce washes ashore and contributes to the degradation of the beach experience because the pristine waters are anything but that in some areas.

Divers the first week of December finished laying 5 acres of organic material at the mouth of Emerald Bay in an attempt to smother the clams at that location.

One thing scientists are still trying to figure out is why lake clarity improved by 4½ feet in 2011 when it was one of the wettest winters on record. Normally wet years bring more sediment via runoff into the lake. Conversely, it’s drought years that are usually good for lake clarity because fine particles are staying on land.

Climate change is something those who study Tahoe know is taking a toll. Each year the flow of stormwater runoff is measured.

“The peak has advanced two weeks,” Schladow told the group of nearly 60 people. This means there is less snow in the mountains.

Records of air temperature also point to climate change, Schladow said.

Another measurement scientists look at is how often the lake mixes – as in the water at the bottom comes to the top and vice versa.

“As we go through the next century we will run out of oxygen at the bottom of the lake,” Schladow said. “Less oxygen at the bottom changes the chemistry at the bottom. ”

This could lead to more phosphorous and nitrogen being created. Those elements contribute to the decline of the lake’s clarity.

A cable is used to measure oxygen at the surface down to the bottom. Water temperature is measured, too.

“We are seeing how mixing changes oxygen (levels). Oxygen is the key variable for climate change,” Schladow said.

He is a believer that the lake needs to continue to be studied and monitored.

“If you don’t measure it, you can’t manage it,” Schladow said in regards to needing to make sure the funding is in place to study the lake and then take the corrective measures to ensure its health.

 

 

 

 

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (10)
  1. Chief Slowroller says - Posted: December 16, 2012

    over watering and fertilizer

  2. David says - Posted: December 16, 2012

    Fertilizer and dredging and probably all the large-scale lakeside development. Sewer pipes do leak occasionally.

    Sediment settles.

  3. thing fish says - Posted: December 16, 2012

    “Sediment settles.”

    Please tell us how long it takes fine particulates to settle, and tell us about the phosphorous loading from all sediments.

  4. Joe Doaks says - Posted: December 17, 2012

    I’ve been losing sleep thinking about this new horrible threat to the god Lake Tahoe. Please help her survive the cruelties of her subjects.

  5. West Shore Local says - Posted: December 17, 2012

    Also, consider all the urban storm drain pipes that discharge directly into the Lake or tributaries. These pipes can have the nastiest polluted water coming out of them!

  6. David says - Posted: December 17, 2012

    thing fish if you’re claiming that “all” sediment is contributing to phosphorous loading there must be a lot of chemical fertilizer reaching the lake.

    Of course the finest particulates settle very slowly, the exact same rate as 150 years ago when the lake was crystal clear. I’m more worried about the concentrations of pollutants and nutrients.

  7. Jason says - Posted: December 17, 2012

    Tahoes been doomed since we shoved the Washoe Indians out and started ruining this sacred lake when the first white idiots started eating each other rather than figuring out how to live off the land. We are The Walking Dead that the Indians saw and wer frightened of back then. Sorry Da Ow Aga but the white geniuses that couldn’t even saw the lakes name right originally are still killing it today. There is no hope unless we lock tourists out and Change the ways everyone lives and even if that happened its not gonna help now. Capitalism kills!

  8. thing fish says - Posted: December 17, 2012

    Oh dear, looks like we have some Pipe Club trolls in here.
    Don’t attribute ideas to me that I did not express. Read the sentence again,it is about phosphorous loading as it applies to all sediments. You brushed off sediments without acknowledging the phosphorous problem with them.

  9. David says - Posted: December 18, 2012

    t.f. thank for reinforcing my point that it’s the pollutants not the rocks and sediment :)

    Not connected with the Pipe Club and not sure who’s doing the trolling here –