THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Justice Dept. secretly obtained journalists’ phone records


image_pdfimage_print

By Sari Horwitz, Washington Post

In a sweeping and unusual move, the Justice Department secretly obtained two months’ worth of telephone records of journalists working for the Associated Press as part of a year-long investigation into the disclosure of classified information about a failed al-Qaeda plot last year.

The AP’s president said Monday that federal authorities obtained cellular, office and home telephone records of individual reporters and an editor; AP general office numbers in Washington, New York and Hartford, Conn.; and the main number for AP reporters covering Congress. He called the Justice Department’s actions a “massive and unprecedented intrusion” into newsgathering activities.

The aggressive investigation into the possible disclosure of classified information to the AP is part of a pattern in which the Obama administration has pursued current and former government officials suspected of releasing secret material. Six officials have been prosecuted, more than under all previous administrations combined.

The Justice Department defends its taking of AP phone records. Graphic/Christian Science Monitor

The Justice Department defends its taking of AP phone records. Graphic/Christian Science Monitor

In a letter to Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., the AP’s president and chief executive, Gary B. Pruitt, said that the Justice Department sought information beyond what could be justified by any specific probe and demanded that the government return the phone records and destroy all copies.

“There can be no possible justification for such an overbroad collection of the telephone communications of the Associated Press and its reporters,” Pruitt wrote to Holder. “These records potentially reveal communications with confidential sources across all of the newsgathering activities undertaken by the AP during a two-month period, provide a road map to AP’s newsgathering operations, and disclose information about AP’s activities and operations that the government has no conceivable right to know.”

The inquiry is one of two leak investigations ordered last June by Holder. The second involves a New York Times report about the Stuxnet computer worm, which was developed jointly by the United States and Israel to damage nuclear centrifuges at Iran’s main uranium-enrichment plant.

The two leak inquiries were started after Republicans in Congress accused the Obama administration of orchestrating news stories intended to demonstrate the president’s toughness on terrorism and improve his chance for reelection. The Republicans sought a special prosecutor, but Holder instead named two veteran prosecutors to handle the inquiries.

In the AP case, the news organization and its reporters and editors are not the likely targets of the investigation. Rather, the inquiry is probably aimed at current or former government officials who divulged classified information.

But experts said the scope of the records secretly seized from the AP and its reporters goes beyond the known scale of previous leak probes.

“This investigation is broader and less focused on an individual source or reporter than any of the others we’ve seen,” said Steven Aftergood, a government secrecy expert at the Federation of American Scientists. “They have swept up an entire collection of press communications. It’s an astonishing assault on core values of our society.”

The office of the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia on Monday released a statement saying it is not required to notify a media organization in advance of issuing such subpoenas if doing so “would pose a substantial threat to the integrity of the investigation.”

“We take seriously our obligations to follow all applicable laws, federal regulations, and Department of Justice policies when issuing subpoenas for phone records of media organizations,” said a statement from Bill Miller, spokesman for the office. “Those regulations require us to make every reasonable effort to obtain information through alternative means before even considering a subpoena for the phone records of a member of the media.”

Justice Department guidelines require that subpoenas of records from news organizations must be approved personally by the attorney general. Holder’s office did not reply to repeated requests for comment.

Lucy A. Dalglish, dean of the journalism school at the University of Maryland, said she thought the scope of the seizure was unprecedented. “Unfortunately, the Justice Department does this now and again,” said Dalglish, former executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. “What’s very unusual is the scope of the subpoenas.”

Republicans also quickly condemned the targeting of journalists and sought to portray the Justice Department’s actions as part of a pattern of Obama administration overreach, noting that the Internal Revenue Service was already enmeshed in a scandal over the reported targeting of conservative groups.

“Coming within a week of revelations that the White House lied to the American people about the Benghazi attacks and the IRS targeted conservative Americans for their political beliefs, Americans should take notice that top Obama administration officials increasingly see themselves as above the law and emboldened by the belief that they don’t have to answer to anyone,” said Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Vista, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick J. Leahy, D-Vt., said in a statement that he is “very troubled by these allegations” and wants to hear the government’s explanation. “The burden is always on the government when they go after private information — especially information regarding the press or its confidential sources,” Leahy said. “I want to know more about this case, but on the face of it, I am concerned that the government may not have met that burden.”

In the AP investigation, Pruitt said, the Justice Department obtained the records without notifying his news organization or narrowing the scope of its subpoenas to specific matters relevant to an ongoing investigation.

The story at issue included details of a CIA operation in Yemen that foiled an al-Qaeda plot in the spring of 2012 to set off a bomb on an airplane headed to the United States. The April and May 2012 phone records of the reporters and editor of the story were among the material seized by the Justice Department.

Pruitt said that on Friday, the AP’s general counsel, Laura Malone, received a letter from Ronald C. Machen Jr., the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, who was appointed by Holder to lead the AP inquiry. He said that last year, the Justice Department obtained telephone records for more than 20 separate phone lines assigned to the AP and its journalists.

A grand jury based in Washington’s federal court has been investigating the possible leak of classified information to the AP for several months, according to a government official familiar with the probe who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing case.

In most cases when investigators seek information about a media organization’s source, the news organization moves to quash any subpoena for its records. But in this case, the AP was not aware that the records had been obtained.

Law enforcement officials say leak cases are difficult because hundreds of people often have access to the classified information. In the AP case, knowledge of the details of the al-Qaeda plot would have been highly compartmentalized, which would limit the number of people with access to it. A former government investigator said telephone records could be valuable in narrowing the pool of suspected leakers.

Numerous senior government officials have been interviewed in connection with the investigation into the AP story. Among those questioned was John O. Brennan, who served as Obama’s counterterrorism adviser before becoming CIA director this year.

In his confirmation hearing in February, Brennan said he had cooperated voluntarily with the Justice Department and had been interviewed. He acknowledged speaking to former U.S. government officials who work as commentators on television news, but he denied sharing any classified information.

Greg Miller, Carol D. Leonnig and Julie Tate contributed to this report.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (7)
  1. Gus says - Posted: May 15, 2013

    Okay — My apologies but I have to rant here. If someone doesn’t believe that this administration has the Bill of Rights in its sights they only need to pay attention to the daily news. Not only has the Justice Department crossed the line on freedom of the press and unreasonable search and seizure, but the Secretary of Health and Human Services is systematically attacking free exercise of religion and personal conscience through enforcement of ObamaCare– unabashed affronts on the First and Fourth Amendments of the Constitution. I’m glad to hear that the head of the IRS was forced-out today for essentially attacking our constitutional right of free association — but will another Caesar take his place? Meanwhile our Second Amendment rights are steadily eroding across the country by efforts led (or tolerated by) wide-eyed Obama theocrats and weak worthless Republicans. What this administration does do well is spin news; although I don’t quite believe that the American people have heard the last of the cover-up over the Benghazi incident.

    Our government is constantly heaping new legal and tax burdens on the American people while exempting themselves from the same. Kay — please interview some of our local congressmen and ask them why they continue to reap huge salaries and perks while in office knowing that much of the money they borrow comes from places like communist China? Debt is a form of servitude and our people are being led into slavery! Meanwhile, while we carry the load, our “representatives” exempt themselves from laws they pass. Who watches guard when they “retire” with fat pensions and benefit packages for life, sometimes after serving only two years in Congress? Another news article today tells us that BHO has become a multi-millionaire since he took first office. Bully for him, but does he really need a full salary and Air Force One to shuttle his wife (and her entourage of hundreds) on shopping outings in Spain and other hot spots? While the President golfs the American people sleep!

    Our government derives its power from the people, something that BHO and too many in our poorly educated populace seem to have forgotten. King George and his aristocratic cronies are alive and well in twenty-first century America.

  2. Dogula says - Posted: May 15, 2013

    And don’t we all feel better knowing that this same DOJ is going to be investigating the IRS’ illegal info sharing and discriminatory audits? Gee, I’m sure they’ll sort it all out fairly.

  3. MTT says - Posted: May 15, 2013

    This story is the only one of the many issues of late, that I (Do NOT) have a problem with.

    They are doing this to find out who in the Government is Leaking Classified information to the press. These leaks are BAD, cost the US allot of money and most probably get people killed. They are trying to identify who is committing TREASON And stop them. The AP is lucky they are not being prosecuted for publishing illegally obtained classified information about an ongoing War Operation.

    Of course the problem is this government has proven that they are not above using information for other than honorable purposes.

    Having the phone records for most everyone in the AP is scary. Who knows what shenanigans will develop over who talked to who?

    Maybe someone will leak that.

    On another note I am even more proud that I am a tea party supporter.

    Both the Dem and Rep machines what to stop the Tea Party movement. We have them both worried, we have the BIG GOVERNMENT MAFIA worried.

    We must be doing it right

  4. Biggerpicture says - Posted: May 15, 2013

    All done through proper channels. It’s funny to read the anti Obama/government folks critiques, yet they would be the first to scream that the Obama administration would be at fault if a “leak” led to American loss of life on American soil or overseas.

    Double standard?

  5. thing fish says - Posted: May 16, 2013

    “And don’t we all feel better knowing that this same DOJ is going to be investigating the IRS’ illegal info sharing and discriminatory audits? Gee, I’m sure they’ll sort it all out fairly.”

    Read the article. Classified information was leaked.
    This has nothing to do with the IRS, or whatever imaginary thing you are railing against.

    To quote yourself: ‘blame the stupid people who are too stupid’

    You so desperately want a scandal to happen in this administration so that it is remotely comparable to what happened under the Bush administration. Just as much as you want to make the argument that Ronald Reagan was the the best president ever, which is based on your default assumption that the best president has to be a Republican. And that is the only card you can play.
    Reagan sucked. Bush 1 sucked. Bush 2 sucked. Nixon sucked.
    And all of them actually did things that were far more corrupt and immoral than Obama has ever and will ever be a part of.
    And yes, we are still paying for a fraudulent was sold to the American people with lies and fear mongering, that Bush never even intended to pay for.
    Sure it is two heads on the same coin, but your guys are far more despicable.

  6. Dogula says - Posted: May 16, 2013

    Fish, I still don’t get why you feel the need to turn this stuff so personal. “your guys are far more despicable.” They’re not MY guys. I repeat, I am a libertarian.
    And yeah, lots of presidents have done lots of bad stuff, many administrations have been corrupt. You neglected to mention the body count of the Clinton administration, conveniently.
    But how on earth does that excuse the travesty that is the current administration? If you want to keep going back and saying, well it’s always been bad so we’ll just let it keep being bad, you will deserve what you get. Enslavement.

  7. Firebreaker says - Posted: May 16, 2013

    Tyranny. No wonder DHS is stocking up on millions of rounds of hallow point bullets… The revolution in this county is on the verge, we just need one spark for the people in the County to stand up to the tyrannical takeover of the United States. Martial Law has all ready begun folks. Resist at all cost.