THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Crystal Bay firm wants to reinvent South Shore


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

MEYERS – A Crystal Bay company has been contracted to come up with two development proposals for the South Shore.

One was met with trepidation, a bit of suspicion and some optimism Wednesday. The other the co-founder and principal of One Globe didn’t want out in the public. The first involves Meyers, the latter the Chateau project – aka the hole in the ground in South Lake Tahoe on the border of Stateline.

“There is no plan for Meyers from One Globe. That is not a plan for Meyers. That is a case study, an analysis of a possibility, a project concept,” El Dorado County Supervisor Norma Santiago emphatically told Lake Tahoe News on Jan. 8.

Santiago was unable to attend the Meyers Community Advisory Council’s meeting Wednesday night.

Sheri Woodsgreen on Jan. 8 explains her company's development concept for Meyers. Photo/Kathryn Reed

Sheri Woodsgreen on Jan. 8 explains her company’s development concept for Meyers. Photo/Kathryn Reed

Sheri Woodsgreen of One Globe presented her concept to the council for the first time on Wednesday. She told Lake Tahoe News she was hired a year ago to start looking at what type of development project Meyers could sustain. However, some members of the Meyers group had no idea Woodsgreen had been hired; and knew nothing about the catalyst project until last month.

One Globe was paid about $20,000 for the Meyers concept from the second round of funding from a Strategic Growth Council grant. The Tahoe Regional Planning Agency was the pass-through agency for the federal grant.

One Globe also has a $50,000 contract with the county to work on economic development in the basin. However, only half of it has been paid because all of the work has not been done. Chief Administrative Officer Terri Daly signed the contract. She has the authority to sign contracts up to $50,000, so the Board of Supervisors never approved this. It is something Santiago advocated for.

The money comes out of the Economic Development budget, which the CAO has control over.

“What they were putting together was a strategic implementation plan to get projects on the ground for El Dorado County,” Santiago told Lake Tahoe News.

The county contracted with One Globe without input from South Lake Tahoe officials or the party that is developing the site. The contract was signed last summer at about the same time the city issued permits for the current retail to be constructed.

Woodsgreen first told Lake Tahoe News that writing about her involvement with the Chateau would derail the project, but then said, “It is only in the concept and discussion phase.”

City National Bank and Owens Financial own the 11-plus acre parcel that until last year had been dormant because the previous developer went belly up.

Tahoe Stateline Ventures is the company property owner Bill Owens formed to develop part of the acreage his firm Owens Financial owns. The $11 million retail project fronting Highway 50 is expected to open later this year.

When Lew Feldman, attorney for TSV, was asked if he knew about the Globe One contract, he told Lake Tahoe News, “No. Why would El Dorado have an agreement with One Globe for a project El Dorado has no jurisdiction over?”

That question has yet to be answered by El Dorado County officials.

Daly has not returned multiple calls, Assistant CAO Kim Kerr deferred detailed comment to Santiago, and Santiago on Wednesday said she didn’t have time to get into it.

Plans for Meyers

The first part of the Jan. 8 meeting in Meyers was about the area plan being putting together that will be the guiding planning tool that will have to be approved by the Board of Supervisors and TRPA Governing Board.

The draft of the plan and associated environmental documents are expected to be released in early February, with a tentative date of Feb. 13 to have a public meeting to gather input. The documents will be in circulation for a 30-day public comment period.

It was decided the Meyers council will seek from the Board of Supervisors to be a more official governing body that would have first crack at any development plans for Meyers.

Making it easier for people to build is a goal of the area plan. This includes ironing out differences between the county and TRPA.

“We want consistency. That is why we want your area plan adopted into our General Plan,” Kerr said.

TRPA and county staff are meeting next week to help get them on the same page.

Meyers resident Jennifer Quashnick is concerned about the height and density regulations. The Meyers Area Plan allows for a maximum height of 35 feet in the town center, which is what the California Conservation Corps building is. The One Globe proposal calls for 45 feet. Per the area plan, this higher height would be allowable if a series of criteria are met.

Quashnick also questioned whether the California Tahoe Conservancy would sell its non-contiguous 5.76 acres in Meyers under its Asset Lands Management Program. And then she wondered if it’s possible to tie properties together for a larger project. (The CTC is meeting today from 10am-noon at Inn by the Lake to discuss the program.)

There is talk of making a website for coverage and CFA so people would know who or what agency has what. And it’s possible it could bring down the price of these commodities.

Some of the local property owners wondered why incentives were not being offered to current businesses – such as help with coverage and access from the highway, which Caltrans has banned.

“In the next year we are looking at transfer coverage policies. We hope to simplify that,” Adam Lewandowski with TRPA said.

But it was stated that incentives involving coverage are not likely.

According to the TRPA, there are 33,650-square-feet of commercial floor area available in Meyers.

“The Meyers Community Plan had requirements for CFA allocation that made it difficult to apply for. The Meyers Area Plan will likely revise the CFA allocation requirements to simplify it and make it easier to apply for new CFA,” Jeff Cowen with TRPA told LTN.

Catalyst project

While Santiago and Woodsgreen called the One Globe proposal “merely a concept”, the document comes across as more than that.

The 71-page document says, “The proposed theme is an Athlete’s Village attraction or The Meyers Basecamp. This athlete’s theme would attract complimentary [sic] entities such as 1) a multiuse education and event center that may include space for meetings and workshops, a cross‐training area, or a physical therapy center; a sustainable food center; large anchor sponsor and/or retail store, such as a sport or outdoor adventure store; and lifestyle sports event services.”

Woodsgreen said this is needed because “athletes don’t feel comfortable on the South Shore. We know that.”

She did not explain her comment. Perhaps she has not heard of Maddie Bowman, Jamie Anderson, Elena Hight, Hannah Teter or Sho Kashima – all who live on the South Shore and all who could be representing the United States in the Olympics next month.

What worries some Meyers council members, who spoke off the record, is that Globe One came up with an idea that would fit into the area plan, so it could be a slam dunk based on legalities even if the community doesn’t want it.

Woodsgreen said her firm came up with the idea based on what people in Meyers have been saying they want.

In one breath Woodsgreen said, “… our infrastructure is outdated.” And in another she said, “Let’s leap from old technology. We don’t need broadband.”

In one breath she praised the Prosperity Plan, saying geotourism, wellness and the environment should be the focus of the basin. The irony is the Prosperity Center, while it has not produced anything tangible, has solely been working on establishing broadband for the basin – something Woodsgreen said is not needed.

In one breath Woodsgreen said the total maximum daily load issue is all about cars. In the next, she said, “If you want people off the highway, you have to have a place for them to be.” In other words, drive to Meyers and then park. Her plans call for underground parking for the sports facility as well as public parking at both ends of town.

(A factual correction: Cars are not the No. 1 issue with TMDL; it’s fine sediment.)

The project calls for melting snow at the sports center as well as what comes from snow removal and treating it in Meyers so it is potable.

Instead of an overpass to get from one side of Highway 50 to the other, One Globe proposes an underground passage for pedestrians and cyclists.

The proposal calls for bungalow-type lodging for athletes and the people they bring. However, currently only 10 tourist accommodation units are tied to Meyers. More could be transferred in if other jurisdictions are willing to do so.

Woodsgreen said she anticipates her project would cost $200 million to build. She proposed the funding come via using the 63-20 IRS rule, which has been on the books since 1963. It involves a nonprofit overseeing the facility for the life of the 30-year bonds and a public agency taking over the aging facility when the debt is paid. (More info about the 63-20 is available here from the state of Washington.)

It was decided at a future date the One Globe proposal needed a full vetting by the Meyers Council, if not the entire community.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (26)
  1. tahoe Pizza Eater says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    This appears to be the pie in the sky mentality that caused the hole in the ground. Meyers is what it is; A quiet location away from the hustle and bustle of the south shore. Are you people who live out there rejecting the natural make up of your community ? Or, are these developers coming into your community forcing their will upon you ?

  2. Old Long Skiis says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    This looks like another classic example of the left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing. From Kae’s article it sounds as though some were caught off guard by this plan and weren’t aware this was even being presented as a concept.
    One quote from Sheri Woodsgreen ,co-founder of One Globe, struck me as being really uninformed about our area, “athletes don’t feel comfortable on south shore. We know that.”
    Are you kidding me? Either this One Globe oufit is new to the area or they didn’t do their homework. So. Shore has a long history of producing some amazing athletes. Some come to train and keep coming back and some are either born here or moved here because they LIKE it.
    You know what we say here in SLT,”When in doubt, hire a consulting firm, it’s worked out so well in the past.”
    Sorry if I’m a bit testy this morning but stuff like this really gets my hackles up.OLS

  3. CJ McCoy says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    South Lake Tahoe has a very bad reputation of government corruption and incompetence. It is well earned and now you are piling more on.

  4. Dogula says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    Federal monies stolen from taxpayers, filtered through federal agencies, down to county agencies, then to private companies unaffiliated with the target area, to tell a town what they should do and how they should do it. All The while, never communicating with the people who live in that town.
    And you all think government is the answer to your problems?

  5. Perry R. Obray says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    Wonder if there is a certain type of athlete that is into graffiti, they should feel at home on a significant part of the 50 corridor in the city of SLT at minimum.

    Might be interesting to see some emphasis on zero/as close as possible within reason, emphasis on zero emission buildings and pathways. AKA passive solar for heating buildings and deicing pathways at minimum.

  6. sunriser2 says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    I sure hope they plan for the bullet train depot.

    These people make me sick. Will they build the people mover to the top of Echo Summit and the gondola from Genoa?

    Keep in mind the people in Markleeville think they will become a destination resort.

    On another point if we need to reduce trips/air pollution so desperately why the hell don’t they fix the @#%^$%**&&* stop lights after thirty years?? The thousands maybe millions of gallons of fuel that have been wasted waiting at and accelerating from a stop must far out weigh any benefits from side walks bike trails and proposed water transport.

  7. Fran says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    Finally, an article that is telling us what is happening behind closed doors with money being spent under the radar. Now Meyers can ban together for our own vision and avoid a hole in the middle of town!

  8. huh says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    Im all for new infrastructure, all around the lake you have old crap buildings everywhere. All the old outdated infrastructure probably causes more ecological problems anyway. South lake is known for partying, gambling, getting blacked out, snowglobe, moguls, and forth of July. All that doesn’t appeal to serious athletes. I don’t care how many you gave example. We also have no ski jump, serious rink, bobsled, xc courses, heavenly doesnt even have a good DH course. This town lacks so much that a true winters sports training destination has.

  9. Irish Wahini says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    Santiago doesn’t have time for much of anything that her job involves…. usually “absent” anyway, but now she doesn’t have time to deal with this…..

    She should bail and let someone who has time to be present, step in.

  10. Ryan Payne says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    a MONORAIL from Meyers to Stateline….

    Park in Meyers and leave your car behind…
    Next stop: the airport
    Then the “Y”
    Lakeview Commons/Harrison Ave.
    Ski Run Marina
    Final stop: the HOLE (but not as a retail center, instead re-envisioned as a world class OUTDOOR EVENT CENTER)

    And don’t forget the express route via Pioneer Trail!

    But fixing the STOP lights on Hwy 50 at minimum would be a great start ;)

  11. Steven says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    This entire article sounds like our tax dollars being given to friends and political backers as a form of payback. As in here, I’ll give you this money, make it look like you earned it.
    If tax dollars are being spent, it better be out in the open with all to see.
    Santiago has been absent for quite awhile now. Must be working on her next employment gig seeing as she is out as a supervisor soon.

  12. Bob says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    I wouldn’t believe a word Santiago says, or anyone at El Dorado County. Their interest is their own and not the public’s!

  13. A.B. says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    What a pipe dream.

  14. Gaspen Aspen says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    I’d say first start with Tveeton’s acre of ghetto graffiti. That slum of an acre is one of the first people see as they come into Meyers. NEXT, you have to try and weed out the ghetto mentality people now infesting south shore and tagging our town like dogs piss on a hydrant.
    This town is nice in that it is far removed from the crap at Stateline, but the locusts from Sacto. and other inner cities seem to have moved this far east now. I see the evidence everywhere! This is why South Shore is now becoming the ghetto of the lake. So sad.

  15. Old Long Skiis says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    Lots of good comments here in regards to the One Globe proposal and of course some negatve ones as well. Traffic light upgrades would be inexpensive and save lots of fuel and reduce emissions. Working on our infrastructure from Meyers to the Stateline is long overdue with some progress already taking place here on So. Shore. Gaspen , you read my mind, Tvetens old place is a great place to start fixing up or bulldozing over. I like the idea for a bobsled run and ski jumps. Heavenly Valley had 2 jumps at the bottom and off to the side of Gunbarell many years ago. Bring em’ back? Ryan the monorail would be awesome but maybe somewhat impractible and expensive but I agree 100% with the outdoor event center at the hole. We need more outdoor events, possibly at the parks and rec. center or maybe bijou park.
    Now for the comments about So. Shores reputation. Lets work to improve it!!! It’s easy to take pot shots at SLT,(no Steve Kubby, not that kind of pot) from the comfort of your keyboard. How about coming up with some solutions to make So. Shore and Meyers a better place to live and make it a more enjoyable experience for our visitors?
    Lots of other good ideas out there but I’ve gone on long enough as it is. Keep the ideas comin’, OLS

  16. Lou Pierini says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    The CCC meeting today is not open to the public.

  17. Mama Bear says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    I live in Meyers and this is the first I have heard of any of this. Personally, I like Meyers pretty much the way it is. Let’s take care of SLT first and give me time to move away before you ruin Meyers.

  18. hmmm... says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    if it doesn’t involve the promise of gettin’ laid at the casino’s, gettin’ drunk at the casino’s, losing money at the casino’s i cannot see ltva endorsing it, therefore it it is dead in the water

  19. Arod says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    Wasteful spending! Seventy grand for what? Woodsgreen does not sound like a competent representative for One Globe. She seems to be justifying her salary. Meyers improvements must be a grassroots effort. We don’t need outside studies to tell us what should be done. Time to get involved in our Meyers community before the corporate interests begin to dictate to us. Keep it small, make it a comfortable, safe area for the LOCALS.

  20. Lou Pierini says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    ElDorado counties interest is in the property taxes lost, which they do have an interest in. Lew U know all about that, don’t U?

  21. bringbackTahoe says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    After reading this , All I can say is one thing.
    DISGUSTED !! . Tahoes beauty and soul is in small town features, not development. Lets go the other way and work to restore it.

  22. Shenja says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    All I can say us I hope who ever is in charge of Meyers future reads my previous comments regarding transportation… Come on now.. We suddenly are worried about what to do with a community that doesn’t even have a bus route connecting us to south lake ?! WTF!!!!!!!!

  23. observer says - Posted: January 9, 2014

    Time to move on Norma. And stay out of my back yard until you do. Must admit though…this is better than Bearville.
    I am one who tried to get a few words with you over the years. Your assistant is very good at keeping anyone from speaking to you.
    Adios

  24. Nimby Green says - Posted: January 10, 2014

    Time for everybody to come to the meetings a quit fabricating “stories” and report the truth. Anybody at the Meyers meetings is very clear that this is happening and who is getting paid for what. The rest is hype !!! Come to the meeting or shut up

  25. lou pierini says - Posted: January 10, 2014

    Nimby, You can’t go if you don’t know about the meeting. How did you know?

  26. tahoe Pizza Eater says - Posted: January 10, 2014

    These people operate using the false theme , “We’re here to help you.” It’s good to see that you people are not falling for their con. That’s what it is, a con; for them to get what they want out of Meyers. Shenja, move back into town where there are buses. I never saw the logic in moving to a community that you don’t like, then trying to change the community. Shenja you are an example of what Meyers does not need.