Bridges add beauty, recreation to cities
By Kathryn Reed
Bridges aren’t just about getting people from point A to point B, they can be an architectural wonder – no matter when they were built.
This is true for two iconic bridges in the United States. The new San Francisco Bay Bridge, while it will always take a backseat to the Golden Gate Bridge, is more aesthetically pleasing than what was there. The Brooklyn Bridge, built in 1883, remains a visual beauty.
I had the opportunity to walk across both bridges this year. Doing so provides a more intimate experience with the structures compared to driving.
Replacing the Bay Bridge became necessary after the 1989 earthquake saw the upper deck collapse onto the lower deck. But it has been one boondoggle after the next. Even to this day there are questions about how safe bolts are, as well as if and when the bike-pedestrian lane will be extended to Yerba Buena Island.
It’s an out-and-back trek of about 7 miles depending on where one starts. This is the first time people have been able to walk on the eastern span of the Bay Bridge.
The only thing that could have made it better is if the path were on the other side – where the Golden Gate is.
While you are parallel to traffic, the vehicles seem far enough away to feel safe. And it was not nearly as loud as any of us expected.
Markings on the path indicate a separation of walkers and cyclists, which helps avoid unpleasant collisions. There is a lane in each direction for two-wheelers; one lane of the 15.5-foot wide path is for pedestrians.
In order to continue the non-motorized path the old bridge has to be removed – which is happening.
When the Brooklyn Bridge was built it was the longest suspension bridge.
We opted to take the subway to Brooklyn and then walk into Manhattan. According to the New York Department of Transportation, 4,000 pedestrians and 3,100 bicyclists cross the Brooklyn Bridge every day.
It is 4-miles long.
What is great about this old bridge is the wooden walking path is above where the vehicles are. You don’t even know cars and trucks are whizzing by below you. Maybe it’s because the skyline is so mesmerizing. At one point the Statue of Liberty is the focal point.
While the United States has an infrastructure problem, these bridges are testaments to why keeping up with maintenance is critical. These are not just tourist attractions, but means of transport for commuters and others.
According to the 2013 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure, “Over 200 million trips are taken daily across deficient bridges in the nation’s 102 largest metropolitan regions. In total, one in nine of the nation’s bridges are rated as structurally deficient, while the average age of the nation’s 607,380 bridges is currently 42 years. The Federal Highway Administration estimates that to eliminate the nation’s bridge deficient backlog by 2028, we would need to invest $20.5 billion annually, while only $12.8 billion is being spent currently. The challenge for federal, state, and local governments is to increase bridge investments by $8 billion annually to address the identified $76 billion in needs for deficient bridges across the United States.”
Great pics… and a nice narrative!
Delightful article! My late father was a bridge engineer for CalTrans for 43 years. He loved bridges, their solutions to various challenges and their beauty. I always think of him when I see an interesting or beautiful bridge.
The other day one of your articles concerned TRPA and how a bridge across Emerald Bay was stopped.
Wouldn’t it be a beautiful thing to have a miniature Golden Gate across its entrance? Plus 89 wouldn’t have to close during heavy snow.
In the late 1950s, Caltrans presented various plans for a bridge across the entrance to Emerald Bay and rerouting Highway 89. Strong public opposition prevailed, and that idea was dropped in the 1960s. This was prior to the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency’s formation. In the same time period, film manufacturer and processor Eastman Kodak declared that Emerald Bay was one most-photographed location in the world, second only to the Taj Mahal in Agra, India.
TRPA was never involved with stopping the bridge it was The League to Save Lake Tahoe. TRPA needs to stop taking credit for something they had nothing to do with.
Mr. Curtzwiler: “Caltrans” did not exist in the 1950s, it was formed in 1972. If you read actual reports from the archives, local businesses (and residents) supported the project while the parks department had many concerns :
http://archive.org/stream/EmeraldBayRouteBridgeProposalsCorrespondence1955-1966/AR_313_449_djvu.txt
Educate yourself, don’t just pass on rumors accepted as fact.
https://www.laketahoenews.net/2013/08/then-and-not-now-public-say-no-to-emerald-bay-bridge/
I pulled this information from an article from LTN and Then and Now from Mr Kingman. I just reprinted it.
Educate yourself, don’t just pass on rumors accepted as fact.
eco alarmist:
Thank you for sharing the web link to the Natural Resources Division Records containing the Emerald Bay Route & Bridge Proposals Correspondence from 1955-1966. I haven’t yet read it in its entirety but what I have read is most interesting, and I find it intriguing that the topic of moving people around the lake goes back as far as 1948.
While I may not always agree with the Sierra Club/Earth Justice, League to Save Lake Tahoe, and the TRPA, I shudder to think what the Tahoe basin would be like right now had they not exercised their historical influence. Unfortunately individuals whose only concern with amassing more money for themselves would likely have created more Tahoe Keys types debacles with no regard for the environment or the natural beauty of the Lake or basin.
4-mer-usmc, The bridge across the entrance to Emerald Bay was a non starter from day one. There were some drawings in a local paper of what it might look like but that’s about as far as it got.
The mess that became the Tahoe Keys was the biggest environumental disaster to happen here in Tahoe other than the logging in the 1800’s.
Speaking of building bridges, maybe some here could build a few bridges with people of differering views.
Just my thoughts. OLS
OLS:
Thank goodness that bridge was a non-starter and thanks also for sharing the info regarding the Keys that my spouse inquired on. You remarked that the City of SLT had not been established when the Keys development took place so I guess it must have been EDC that was involved in the approval of that project. Helps me have a better understanding why a lot of people have remarked to me that EDC doesn’t really care about Tahoe but only about the revenue they can get out of Tahoe.
I agree with you that some civility would go a long way by some of the bloggers on this site that now fairly much hold it hostage with their vitriol. The recurrent name calling has become tiresome and it impacts an intelligent exchange of ideas. It is possible to disagree without being so disagreeable, as anyone who has been happily married for any length of time had to figure out, or else they wouldn’t remain married for long.
Have a good holiday and New Year (2015!).