THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Meat industry’s worst nightmare could become a reality


image_pdfimage_print

By Roberto A. Ferdman, Washington Post

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is preparing to release the latest version of the government’s influential dietary guidelines this year, and there could be a major change that accelerates the trend of Americans eating less meat.

The guidelines, which are updated every five years, have traditionally advised Americans about healthy eating choices, eating choices which, until now, have only reflected what the government views as a diet that is healthy for humans. But the panel that advises the government is pushing for the recommendations to reflect what is healthy for the environment, too. Given the huge carbon footprint of meat production, making this change would almost certainly entail lowering the official, government-recommended intake of meat.

Americans, though they are eating less meat than they have in the past, are still fond of steaks, hamburgers, and chicken wings. And the environmental impact of that diet is significant. Carnivores contribute far more to environmental decay than do vegetarians. The livestock industry is responsible for an estimated 15 percent of total global carbon emissions, roughly two-thirds of which is the result of beef production. On a per kilogram basis, the carbon footprint of lamb and beef production is unparalleled.

Read the whole story

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (15)
  1. Kits Carson says - Posted: January 11, 2015

    Now the stinking government is going to try and tell us what to eat?!?! Their idiocy knows no bounds.

  2. tahoeadvocate says - Posted: January 11, 2015

    Kits- The American public has already given the government power to tell us what to eat. The FDA controls what you eat today unless you plant vegetables and fruit on your own land and have an “authorized” piece of property to raise your own meat. Even then the seeds you might plant have been “authorized” by the government.

  3. map says - Posted: January 11, 2015

    So, they don’t care if your diet is healthy. As long as the environment is spared.

    Just like changing the PAP smear test requirement. Drugs etc.

    It is all about the money and the perceived political correctness

  4. cosa pescado says - Posted: January 11, 2015

    ‘So, they don’t care if your diet is healthy.’

    How did you come to that conclusion?

  5. map says - Posted: January 11, 2015

    They are making their decision on what is healthy based on environmental issues not true dietary science.

  6. southie says - Posted: January 11, 2015

    They’ll get my chicken wings when they can pry them from my cold dead hands.

  7. cosa pescado says - Posted: January 11, 2015

    ‘They are making their decision on what is healthy based on environmental issues not true dietary science’

    Are you sure they aren’t also considering the environment, as well as nutrition?
    Read the article again.

  8. Gus says - Posted: January 11, 2015

    Big Brother lives.

  9. Kits Carson says - Posted: January 11, 2015

    I DO grow my own veggies, fruit and meat. All organic.

  10. Hmmm... says - Posted: January 11, 2015

    Do some research on all the crap(literally AND figuratively) that is allowed in Meat. Add that to the barbaric manner in which animals are housed and slaughtered, and the concentrated waste from factory farms going into rivers and acquifers …and the only conclusion a thinking individual can come to is…either hunt and fish or raise your own or go veggie. Kudos to Kits if you actually do raise your own-i still don’t like your comments but i respect you for that.

  11. Gaspen Aspen says - Posted: January 11, 2015

    Hmmm; Thank you. I really do.

  12. Kits carson says - Posted: January 11, 2015

    Gaspen….you do as well? I never would have guessed. But Hmmm was referring to me not you.

    Hmmm Thanks for the kudos. We can agree that we disagree on things but mutual respect goes a long way.

  13. ljames says - Posted: January 12, 2015

    “So, they don’t care if your diet is healthy. As long as the environment is spared.”

    One would think a healthy environment leads to healthier people? I guess some people just can’t see a link?

  14. nature bats last says - Posted: January 12, 2015

    The environment and its quality is absolutly integral to a healthy life and better quality food is part of that equation. Maybe if people stopped breeding, and all the “illegal” folks that come here for many reasons left, maybe if we stopped paving wild places so OHV hunters could get to their favorite place to shoot critters, maybe if we let cows, sheep, pigs, chickens have free range anywhere that their humans wanted them to go….you see, there are rules and laws in place for many reasons and people can still choose to eat what they want, despite the comments above saying the government controls that too. They dont. They might make recomendations based on factors, one being what effects the environment. I am glad there are rules to keep pig farms off the banks of rivers. Im glad that we have access to organically grown food and that there are options for dairy foods that dont have growth hormones. IMHO

  15. sunriser2 says - Posted: January 12, 2015

    Tools of the corn and soy bean lobby. I have diabetes and have more than doubled my meat intake and keep my carbohydrate intake under 100 grams per day.

    Blood sugar went from 345 to 108 lost over thirty pounds in less than a year and took 70 points off of my total cholesterol count.

    #@!*&^% Monsanto and their worthless studies.